1.Effects of D-003 (10 mg/day) on Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Study.
Alfredo CEBALLOS ; Gladys CASTANO ; Sarahi MENDOZA ; Juan GONZALEZ ; Rosa MAS ; Lilia FERNANDEZ ; Jose ILLNAIT ; Meilis MESA ; Rafael GAMEZ ; Julio Cesar FERNANDEZ ; Ricardo TELLES ; Duany MARRERO ; Mainel Gomez ENG ; Dalmer RUIZ ; Yunaisi JARDINES
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;26(2):168-178
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Increased osteoclast activity is a pivotal finding in osteoporosis. This increase is mediated via the mevalonate-to-cholesterol pathway, which is involved in producing the intermediates required for osteoclast activity. D-003, a mixture of high molecular weight sugarcane wax acids, has been shown to inhibit cholesterol synthesis prior to mevalonate production, resulting in a reduction of bone loss and resorption in ovariectomized rats. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that short-term D-003 treatment reduces urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline/creatinine in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We performed a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effects of D-003 (10 mg/day) treatment for 3 years on bone mineral density (BMD) in 83 postmenopausal women with low BMD. RESULTS: Over 3 years, D-003 treatment increased lumbar spine BMD (5.1%, p < 0.01) and improved osteoporosis-related quality of life scores as compared with placebo-treated controls. D-003 was also well tolerated; the frequency of adverse events in the bone, joints, or muscle with D-003 treatment (p < 0.05) was lower than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: D-003 treatment (10 mg/day) for 3 years increased lumbar spine BMD and produced clinical improvements in postmenopausal women with low BMD. Further studies, however, will be required to confirm these results.
Absorptiometry, Photon
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Analysis of Variance
;
Bone Density/*drug effects
;
Bone Density Conservation Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Cuba
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Fatty Acids/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Female
;
Femur Neck/*drug effects/radiography
;
Humans
;
Lipids/blood
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/*drug effects/radiography
;
Middle Aged
;
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/blood/*drug therapy/psychology/radiography
;
Quality of Life
;
Questionnaires
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Efficacy and Safety of Monthly 150 mg Oral Ibandronate in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;26(3):340-347
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of monthly oral 150 mg ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes between monthly oral 150 mg ibandronate and weekly 70 mg alendronate, daily 2.5 mg ibandronate, and a placebo. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Once-monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy was clinically comparable to weekly 70 mg alendronate, showing increased bone mineral density (BMD) in both the lumbar spine and total hip. Pooled data from two cross-over trials showed that significantly more women with PMO preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy (relative risk [RR], 2.422; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.111 to 2.825; p < 1 x 10(-8)) and found the monthly ibandronate regimen more convenient than the weekly alendronate regimen (RR, 3.096; 95% CI, 2.622 to 3.622; p < 1 x 10(-8)). Monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy resulted in a significantly higher change in BMD of the lumbar spine than with the placebo. A once monthly 150 mg regimen produced greater increases in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD than daily treatment, with a similar incidence of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy was clinically comparable to weekly 70 mg alendronate, and patients strongly preferred the convenience of monthly ibandronate over weekly alendronate. Monthly 150 mg ibandronate was superior to, and as well tolerated as, the daily treatment.
Administration, Oral
;
Alendronate/administration & dosage
;
Bone Density/drug effects
;
Bone Density Conservation Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Bone and Bones/drug effects/radiography
;
Diphosphonates/*administration & dosage/adverse effects
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy/radiography
;
Patient Preference
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Comparison of Effect of Treatment with Etidronate and Alendronate on Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Women with Osteoporosis.
Jun IWAMOTO ; Tsuyoshi TAKEDA ; Yoshihiro SATO ; Mitsuyoshi UZAWA
Yonsei Medical Journal 2005;46(6):750-758
The purpose of this open-labeled prospective study was to compare the treatment effects of cyclical etidronate and alendronate on the lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in elderly women with osteoporosis. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, age ranging from 55 to 86 years (mean: 70.7 years), were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group: the cyclical etidronate group (etidronate 200 mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the alendronate group (5 mg daily). The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) measured by DXA, the urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) level measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and back pain evaluated by the face scale score were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, years since menopause, lumbar BMD, urinary NTX level, and face scale score between the two treatment groups. Etidronate treatment sustained the lumbar BMD following a reduction in the urinary NTX level and improved back pain, while alendronate treatment reduced the urinary NTX level more significantly, resulting in an increase in the lumbar BMD, and similarly improved back pain. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. This study confirmed that alendronate treatment had a greater efficacy than etidronate treatment in increasing the lumbar BMD through the reduction of bone resorption in elderly women with osteoporosis.
Spinal Fractures/prevention & control/radiography
;
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy
;
Middle Aged
;
Lumbar Vertebrae/*drug effects
;
Humans
;
Female
;
Etidronic Acid/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Bone Density/*drug effects
;
Biological Markers/blood/urine
;
Back Pain/drug therapy
;
Alendronate/adverse effects/*therapeutic use
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Aged
4.Determinants of One-year Response of Lumbar Bone Mineral Density to Alendronate Treatment in Elderly Japanese Women with Osteoporosis.
Jun IWAMOTO ; Tsuyoshi TAKEDA ; Yoshihiro SATO ; Mitsuyoshi UZAWA
Yonsei Medical Journal 2004;45(4):676-682
The purpose of this study was to determine factors that could predict the one-year response of the lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) to alendronate treatment in elderly Japanese women with osteoporosis. Eighty-five postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, all of whom were between 55-88 years of age, were treated with alendronate (5 mg daily) for 12 months. Serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and urinary NTX levels were measured at the baseline and 6 months, and lumbar (L1-L4) BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at the baseline and 12 months. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors that were correlated with the percent change in lumbar BMD at 12 months. Lumbar BMD increased by 8.1 % at 12 months with a reduction in the urinary NTX level by 51.0 % at 6 months. Baseline lumbar BMD (R2=0.226, p< 0.0001) and percent changes in serum ALP and urinary NTX levels (R2=0.044, p< 0.05 and R2=0.103, p< 0.001, respectively) had a negative correlation with the percent change in lumbar BMD at month 12, while the baseline number of prevalent vertebral fractures (R2=0.163, p< 0.001), serum ALP level, and urinary NTX level (R2=0.074, p< 0.05 and R2=0.160, p< 0.001, respectively) had a positive correlation with it. However, baseline age, height, body weight, body mass index, years since menopause, serum calcium and phosphorus levels, and percent changes in serum calcium and phosphorus levels at 6 months did not have any significant correlation with the percent change in lumbar BMD at 12 months. These results suggest that lumbar BMD was more responsive to one-year of alendronate treatment in elderly osteoporotic Japanese women with lower lumbar BMD, more prevalent vertebral fractures, and higher bone turnover, who showed a greater decrease in bone turnover at 6 months, regardless of age, years since menopause, and physique. Alendronate may be efficacious in elderly Japanese women with evident osteoporosis that is associated with high bone turnover, and the percent changes in serum ALP and urinary NTX levels at 6 months could predict the one-year response of lumbar BMD to alendronate treatment.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Alendronate/*administration & dosage
;
Alkaline Phosphatase/blood
;
Bone Density/*drug effects
;
Calcium/blood
;
Collagen/urine
;
Densitometry, X-Ray
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Japan
;
*Lumbar Vertebrae/radiography
;
Middle Aged
;
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy/epidemiology/radiography
;
Peptides/urine
;
Phosphorus/blood
;
Spinal Fractures/epidemiology/prevention & control