Study in 195 oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, results showed that this cancer mainly occurred in the group of 40-70 years old (70%), male was more often than female (2.8 times), duration of onset: <3 months: 40%, 3-6 months: 30.2%, 6-12 months: 18.4%, >12 months: 10.7%. Symptoms are: sore throat 59.7%, dysphagia 73.3%, changes of voice 43%, bleeding phlegm 15.8%, difficult swallow 7.8%, and lock-jaw 20.7%. Primary tumors on the right/left were 49.7% and 50.3%. 87.6% of lymph nodes were on the same side of tumors, 12.3% on the opposite side. Most patients have been diagnosed in late stages. 74.8% tumors were squamous cell carcinoma, 25.2% were undifferentiated carcinoma.
Carcinoma/pathology ; Diagnosis ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms

The objectives of treating oropharyngeal cancer are complete removal of tumor, restoration of function and aesthetics, and such treatments require adequate exposure for direct visual and bimanual examination. It presents challenges for the head and neck oncologist. A thorough evaluation is necessary to stage these tumors appropriately. Surgical treatment requires addressing the primary tumor and also neck disease, reconstructive techniques, and associated morbidities. A multidisciplinary approach helps balance the tumor stage, patient's comorbidities, functional outcome, and patient's wishes, thereby maximizing patient outcomes.
Comorbidity ; Esthetics ; Head ; Humans ; Neck ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms*

Child, Preschool ; Fibroma ; pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ; pathology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In order to eradicate the disease and preserve function of oropharynx and facial contour, appropriate surgical approach should be chosen for surgical treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. This study was performed to evaluate the usefulness and effectiveness of various surgical approaches in the surgical treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We analyzed 65 patients with oropharyngeal cancer who underwent surgery as a primary treatment from Jan. 1994 to Jun. 2009, retrospectively. Primary tumor site, TNM stage, surgical approach, management of neck, reconstruction method, complication, recurrence rate were analyzed to assess advantages and disadvantages of various surgical approaches. RESULTS: The surgical approaches applied were transoral approach in 25, mandibulotomy in 23, lower cheek flap in 4, trans-pharyngeal in 9, and mandibular lingual releasing approach in 4. Most of T1 lesion was resected by transoral approach (65.0%). For advanced T3 and T4, mandibulotomy was mainly used. Lateral pharyngotomy and mandibular lingual release approach were used for the surgery of moderate size of oropharyngeal cancer. The locoregional recurrence rate did not differ according to different surgical approaches with regard to T and N stages. CONCLUSION: Transoral approach is very useful for the most of small oropharyngeal cancer. Mandibulotomy provides most wide surgical view for advanced T3, T4 oropharyngeal cancer.
Cheek ; Humans ; Neck ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ; Oropharynx ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies

The number of new cases of oropharyngeal cancer is increasing year by year among the world, and HPV infection is one of the risk factors for this malignant tumor. Compared with HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer, HPV-positive patients are more sensitive to radiotherapy and have a better prognosis, but there is no accepted treatment for HPV-positive patients. Reducing treatment intensity moderately and exploring the best option to minimize side effects of treatment are urgent issues to be addressed. This article reviews the research progress on the treatment improvement of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in recent years.
Humans ; Papillomavirus Infections ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy* ; Risk Factors

Thirty-six patients (24 with oral cavity or oropharynx cancers and 12 larynx cancers) were prospectively examined with computed tomography (CT) to determine its value in staging the primary tumor and to compare with the clinical staging. The CT staging agreed with the clinical staging in 50% (12/24) of the oral cavity or oropharynx cancers and in 67% (8/12) of the larynx cancers. The CT upgraded the clinical staging in 29% (7/24) of the oral cavity or oropharynx tumors and in 33% (4/12) of the larynx cancers, whereas the CT downgraded the clinical staging in 21 % (5/24) of the oral cavity or oropharynx cancers. There is no downgrade on CT in larynx cancer. The post-surgical confirmation was not made in most of the cases. The possible causes of disagreement between the CT and the clinical staging, and the diagnostic value of the CT in evaluation of the primary tumor in oral cavity, oropharynx and larynx were discussed.
Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Head ; Humans ; Laryngeal Neoplasms ; Larynx ; Mouth ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ; Oropharynx ; Prospective Studies

Extensive surgical resection of the aerodigestive track can result in a large and complex defect of the oropharynx, which represents a significant reconstructive challenge for the plastic surgery. Development of microsurgical techniques has allowed for free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects, with superior outcomes as well as decreases in postoperative complications. The reconstructive goals for oral and oropharyngeal defects are to restore the anatomy, to maintain continuity of the intraoral surface and oropharynx, to protect vital structures such as carotid arteries, to cover exposed portions of internal organs in preparation for adjuvant radiation, and to preserve complex functions of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Oral and oropharyngeal cancers should be treated with consideration of functional recovery. Multidisciplinary treatment strategies are necessary for maximizing disease control and preserving the natural form and function of the oropharynx.
Carotid Arteries ; Free Tissue Flaps* ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; Mouth ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ; Oropharynx ; Postoperative Complications ; Surgery, Plastic

The bronchogenic cyst is an uncommon benign congenital anomaly of the primitive ventral foregut. They usually occur in the mediastinum and intrapulmonary regions. Localization in the cervical area is unusual and the majority of cases reported have been found in the pediatric population. Radiologically, it can not be differentiated from other cystic lesions. Therefore, it is pa-thologically confirmed only when there are bronchial tissues such as pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium, smooth muscle, mucous gland or cartilage. Since this cyst has potential for complication, a complete excision is mandatory. We recently experienced a case of retropharyngeal bronchogenic cyst presenting as a lump sensation in 32-year-old male. In this article, we reviewed the etiology, the diagnosis, and the treatment of this case with a review of the literatures.
Bronchial Neoplasms ; Bronchogenic Cyst ; Cartilage ; Epithelium ; Humans ; Male ; Mediastinum ; Muscle, Smooth ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms ; Sensation

Objective:To analysis the clinical features and prognosis in oropharyngeal carcinoma with secondary primary tumor. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 468 pathologically confirmed oropharyngeal cancer as the primary tumor patients with p16 status, excluded distant metastasis, and admitted to the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2010 to December 2020. The clinical features and prognosis of the secondary primary tumor were analyzed. Results:Among 468 patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated at initial diagnosed, 222 cases were P16-negative. With a median follow-up time of 64.3 months, 66 cases developed second primary cancer, with an incidence of 29.3%, among which 63.6%（42/66） were synchronous and 36.4%（24/66） were heterochronous, esophagus was the most commonly involved site. The 5-year OS of p16-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma with synchronous second primary cancer, without second primary cancer and with heterogeneous second primary cancer were 26.3% and 57.3% and 73.2%（P=0.001）; The second primary cancer accounted for 11.2%（12/107） of the deaths in the whole group, among them, the heterochronous second primary accounted for 75.0%（9/12）. There were 246 patients with p16 positive, with a median follow-up time of 52.4 months, 20 patients developed second primary cancer（8.1%）. Among them, 65.0%（13/20） were synchronous and 35.0%（7/20） were heterochronous. Esophagus was the most commonly involved site. The 4-year OS of p16-positive with synchronous, heterochronous and non-second primary cancer group were 51.9%, 80.7% and 83.3%. Secondary primary cancer accounted for 3.8%（2/52） of all deaths in p16 positvie group. Conclusion:The incidence of second primary cancer of p16 positive and negative oropharyngeal carcinoma were different. The esophagus was the most commonly involved site regardless of p16 status. Regardless of p16 status, the survival of patients with synchronous second primary cancer was worse than those without second primary cancer. For p16-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma, the prognosis was better in patients with heterogeneous second primary cancer, the second primary cancer is one of the main causes of death.
Humans ; Carcinoma/diagnosis* ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis* ; Retrospective Studies ; Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnosis*

A variety of residual defects containing many sulci and fossae in the oropharyngeal cavity make it extremely difficult to achieve an adequate flap design as well as the functional reconstruction of the complex defects after ablation surgery for oropharyngeal tumors. This study attempted to standardize flap design for the different types of defects in order to produce a better functional reconstruction of intra-oral defects. The oropharyngeal defects were classified into 6 Zones. When the defect involves only the mouth floor, it was classified as Zone 1. A hemi tongue was classified as Zone 2. A defect involving the mouth floor and a part of the tongue was classified as Zone 3. A defect involving the mouth floor, a part of the tongue and the tonsil was classified as Zone 4. A defect involving the mouth floor, a part of the tongue, tonsil and soft palate was classified as Zone 5. A defect involving the pharyngeal wall was classified as Zone 6. The following four types of forearm free flap designs were applied to each defective Zone accordingly: Type I flap design - an unilobed design for reconstructing Zone 1, 2 and 6 defects, Type II design - bilobed design for reconstructing Zone 3 defects, Type III design - trilobed design for reconstructing Zone 4 defects and Type IV design for reconstructing Zone 5 defects. During 1999 to 2002, 91 patients with oropharyngeal defects underwent a reconstruction using these standardized forearm free flap designs. The Type I design was used in 41 cases, the Type II design in 18 cases, the Type III design in 10 cases and the Type IV design in 22 cases. In all patients, the decannulation was successful, and the swallowing and deglutination functions were within the normal parameters. There was less nasal escape of the voice and the regurgitation of food than that observed using the conventional flap design method. Effective and functional reconstructions with minimal morbidities are possible with the application of the standardized forearm free flap design in oropharyngeal defects.
Human ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/*surgery ; Oropharynx/*surgery ; *Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods ; *Surgical Flaps