1.Sepsis and Meningitis due to Listeria Monocytogenes.
Orhan YILDIZ ; Bilgehan AYGEN ; Duygu ESEL ; Uner KAYABAS ; Emine ALP ; Bulent SUMERKAN ; Mehmet DOGANAY
Yonsei Medical Journal 2007;48(3):433-439
PURPOSE: This study focused on the effect of immuno-compromising conditions on the clinical presentation of severe listerial infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine human listeriosis cases seen from 1991-2002 were reviewed. All adult patients, from whose blood, peritoneal fluid or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) the L. monocytogenes was isolated, were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Listeriosis presented as primary sepsis with positive blood cultures in 5 cases and meningitis with positive CSF cultures in 4 cases. All of these patients had at least one underlying disease, most commonly, hematologic malignancy, diabetes mellitus, amyloidosis and hepatic cirrhosis; 55.6% had received immunosuppressive or corticosteroid therapy within a week before the onset of listeriosis. The patients were adults with a mean age of 60 years. Fever, night sweats, chills and lethargy were the most common symptoms; high temperature (> 38 degrees C), tachycardia, meningeal signs and poor conditions in general were the most common findings on admission. The mortality rate was 33.3% and was strictly associated with the severity of the underlying disease. Mortality differences were significant between sepsis (20%) and meningitis (50%) patients. CONCLUSION: Listeriosis as an uncommon infection in our region and that immuno- suppressive therapy is an important pre-disposing factor of listeriosis. Sepsis and meningitis were more common in this group of patients and had the highest case-fatality rate for food-borne illnesses.
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Ascitic Fluid/microbiology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Immunosuppressive Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Listeria Infections/blood/cerebrospinal fluid/*drug therapy
;
Listeria monocytogenes/*drug effects/growth & development/isolation & purification
;
Male
;
Meningitis, Bacterial/blood/cerebrospinal fluid/*drug therapy
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sepsis/blood/cerebrospinal fluid/*drug therapy
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Can C-Reactive Protein-Lymphocyte Ratio Be Used as a Screening Tool to Confirm the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?
Orhan BALTA ; Sezer ASTAN ; Harun ALTINAYAK ; Cihan UÇAR ; Feyza Yildiz AYTEKIN ; Recep KURNAZ
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2023;15(6):917-927
Background:
This study aimed to investigate whether periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be predicted by the C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR), whether this ratio increases the accuracy of PJI diagnosis, and whether it is more sensitive than other blood values and ratios.
Methods:
The patients were divided into two groups: the septic revision (SR) group and the aseptic revision (AR) group. In cases of septic revision, the diagnosis of PJI was made based on the criteria proposed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). The groups were compared in terms of age, sex, body mass index, comorbidity, and preoperative laboratory results. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic performance of the values and ratios were analyzed and compared.
Results:
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the CLR gave a diagnostic value of 15.52, which provided a sensitivity of 91.1% and a specificity of 64.2% for PJI. The CLR gave lower specificity and higher sensitivity compared to the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. The ROC analysis showed that the CLR had a similar area under the curve (AUC) with the ESR and CRP (0.808). The CLR had a higher specificity than other ratios (platelet volume ratio, neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio) and a higher value of the AUC. In the multivariate analysis, the CLR (hazard ratio, 1.088; 95% confidence interval, 1.063–1.113; p < 0.001) was found to be a significant risk factor. As CLR increased by one unit, the risk of PJI increased by 1.088 times, and it was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The findings of this study suggest that CLR can serve as a valuable screening tool for diagnosing PJI. CLR demonstrated higher sensitivity in predicting PJI compared to ESR and CRP, and it exhibited greater specificity than other infection markers.