1.Analysis of copy number abnormality (CNA) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the whole genome using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays in tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Kuroiwa TSUKASA ; Yamamoto NOBUHARU ; Onda TAKESHI ; Bessyo HIROKI ; Yakushiji TAKASHI ; Katakura AKIRA ; Takano NOBUO ; Shibahara TAKAHIKO
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2011;37(6):550-555
Chromosomal loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a common mechanism for the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in human epithelial cancers. LOH patterns can be generated through allelotyping using polymorphic microsatellite markers; however, owing to the limited number of available microsatellite markers and the requirement for large amounts of DNA, only a modest number of microsatellite markers can be screened. Hybridization to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays using Affymetarix GeneChip Mapping 10 K 2.0 Array is an efficient method to detect genome-wide cancer LOH. We determined the presence of LOH in oral SCCs using these arrays. DNA was extracted from tissue samples obtained from 10 patients with tongue SCCs who presented at the Hospital of Tokyo Dental College. We examined the presence of LOH in 3 of the 10 patients using these arrays. At the locus that had LOH, we examined the presence of LOH using microsatellite markers. LOH analysis using Affymetarix GeneChip Mapping 10K Array showed LOH in all patients at the 1q31.1. The LOH regions were detected and demarcated by the copy number 1 with the series of three SNP probes. LOH analysis of 1q31.1 using microsatellite markers (D1S1189, D1S2151, D1S2595) showed LOH in all 10 patients (100). Our data may suggest that a putative tumor suppressor gene is located at the 1q31.1 region. Inactivation of such a gene may play a role in tongue tumorigenesis.
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
;
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
;
Chimera
;
Coat Protein Complex I
;
DNA
;
Genes, Tumor Suppressor
;
Genes, vif
;
Genome
;
Humans
;
Loss of Heterozygosity
;
Microsatellite Repeats
;
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
;
Tokyo
;
Tongue
2.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections
Shigeru NISHIYAMA ; Takeshi HISA ; Aki EGO ; Shogo SAKATA ; Yui ITO ; Akiharu KUDO ; Takahiro YAMADA ; Shozo OSERA ; Hideki FUKUSHIMA ; Shunta ISHIZAKI ; Ryoga HAMURA ; Masashi TSUNEMATSU ; Kyohei ABE ; Yoshihiro SHIRAI ; Shinji ONDA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):15-19
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUSD) is an effective treatment for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs); however, standards regarding stents used for EUSD have not been established. This study analyzed the outcomes of EUSD of POPFCs at our hospital and examined the safety and effectiveness of plastic stents/tubes.
Methods:
This retrospective, single-center study focused on EUSD of POPFCs performed at our hospital. We examined the rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrence.
Results:
Twenty-seven patients were included in this study. The initial drainage methods comprised one nasocystic plastic tube (NPT) and one double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) for 19 (70.4%) patients, two DPS for four (14.8%) patients, one NPT for three (11.1%) patients, and one lumen-apposing metal stent for one (3.7%) patient. The technical success and clinical success rates were both 100%. Fourteen of the 19 patients with one NPT and one DPS improved, but five patients required additional interventions and improved with fistula site dilation. Although recurrence occurred in one patient, improvement was achieved with second EUSD. Early adverse events comprised one case of bleeding for which hemostasis was achieved by performing coil embolization. Late adverse events comprised three cases of DPS migration; however, no additional intervention was required.
Conclusion
The use of plastic tubes/stents is safe and effective for EUSD of POPFCs.
3.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections
Shigeru NISHIYAMA ; Takeshi HISA ; Aki EGO ; Shogo SAKATA ; Yui ITO ; Akiharu KUDO ; Takahiro YAMADA ; Shozo OSERA ; Hideki FUKUSHIMA ; Shunta ISHIZAKI ; Ryoga HAMURA ; Masashi TSUNEMATSU ; Kyohei ABE ; Yoshihiro SHIRAI ; Shinji ONDA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):15-19
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUSD) is an effective treatment for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs); however, standards regarding stents used for EUSD have not been established. This study analyzed the outcomes of EUSD of POPFCs at our hospital and examined the safety and effectiveness of plastic stents/tubes.
Methods:
This retrospective, single-center study focused on EUSD of POPFCs performed at our hospital. We examined the rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrence.
Results:
Twenty-seven patients were included in this study. The initial drainage methods comprised one nasocystic plastic tube (NPT) and one double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) for 19 (70.4%) patients, two DPS for four (14.8%) patients, one NPT for three (11.1%) patients, and one lumen-apposing metal stent for one (3.7%) patient. The technical success and clinical success rates were both 100%. Fourteen of the 19 patients with one NPT and one DPS improved, but five patients required additional interventions and improved with fistula site dilation. Although recurrence occurred in one patient, improvement was achieved with second EUSD. Early adverse events comprised one case of bleeding for which hemostasis was achieved by performing coil embolization. Late adverse events comprised three cases of DPS migration; however, no additional intervention was required.
Conclusion
The use of plastic tubes/stents is safe and effective for EUSD of POPFCs.
4.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections
Shigeru NISHIYAMA ; Takeshi HISA ; Aki EGO ; Shogo SAKATA ; Yui ITO ; Akiharu KUDO ; Takahiro YAMADA ; Shozo OSERA ; Hideki FUKUSHIMA ; Shunta ISHIZAKI ; Ryoga HAMURA ; Masashi TSUNEMATSU ; Kyohei ABE ; Yoshihiro SHIRAI ; Shinji ONDA
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention 2025;14(1):15-19
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (EUSD) is an effective treatment for postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs); however, standards regarding stents used for EUSD have not been established. This study analyzed the outcomes of EUSD of POPFCs at our hospital and examined the safety and effectiveness of plastic stents/tubes.
Methods:
This retrospective, single-center study focused on EUSD of POPFCs performed at our hospital. We examined the rates of technical success, clinical success, adverse events, and recurrence.
Results:
Twenty-seven patients were included in this study. The initial drainage methods comprised one nasocystic plastic tube (NPT) and one double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) for 19 (70.4%) patients, two DPS for four (14.8%) patients, one NPT for three (11.1%) patients, and one lumen-apposing metal stent for one (3.7%) patient. The technical success and clinical success rates were both 100%. Fourteen of the 19 patients with one NPT and one DPS improved, but five patients required additional interventions and improved with fistula site dilation. Although recurrence occurred in one patient, improvement was achieved with second EUSD. Early adverse events comprised one case of bleeding for which hemostasis was achieved by performing coil embolization. Late adverse events comprised three cases of DPS migration; however, no additional intervention was required.
Conclusion
The use of plastic tubes/stents is safe and effective for EUSD of POPFCs.