1.A comparative analysis of odontogenic maxillofacial infections in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: an institutional study.
Rahul D KAMAT ; Vikas DHUPAR ; Francis AKKARA ; Omkar SHETYE
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2015;41(4):176-180
OBJECTIVES: The increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance is an outcome of evolution. Most patients presenting with odontogenic space infections also have associated systemic co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus resulting in impaired host defense. The present study aims to compare the odontogenic spaces involved, antibiotic susceptibility of microorganisms, length of hospital stay, and the infl uence of systemic comorbidities on treatment outcome in diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2-year prospective study from January 2012 to January 2014 was conducted on patients with odontogenic maxillofacial space infections. The patients were divided into two groups based on their glycemic levels. The data were compiled and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were included in the study that underwent surgical incision and drainage, removal of infection source, specimen collection for culture-sensitivity, and evaluation of diabetic status. Sixty-one out of 188 patients were found to be diabetic. The submandibular space was the most commonly involved space, and the most prevalent microorganism was Klebsiella pneumoniae in diabetics and group D Streptococcus in the nondiabetic group. CONCLUSION: The submandibular space was found to be the most commonly involved space, irrespective of glycemic control. Empiric antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid combined with metronidazole with optimal glycemic control and surgical drainage of infection led to resolution of infection in diabetic as well as nondiabetic patients. The average length of hospital stay was found to be relatively longer in diabetic individuals.
Amoxicillin
;
Clavulanic Acid
;
Comorbidity
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Drainage
;
Drug Resistance, Microbial
;
Humans
;
Klebsiella pneumoniae
;
Length of Stay
;
Metronidazole
;
Prevalence
;
Prospective Studies
;
Specimen Handling
;
Streptococcus
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Intra-alveolar extraction of linguoverted mandibular premolars – the Shetye technique: a technical note
Omkar Anand SHETYE ; Pooja Narendra MANDREKAR ; Rakshit Vijay KHANDEPARKER ; Trishala Bhadauria FERNANDES ; Vikas DHUPAR ; Francis AKKARA
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2022;48(4):242-244
Extraction of premolars for orthodontic purposes may prove challenging when the tooth is blocked or lingualised. The standard buccal approach may prove difficult in such cases. A novel technique was used for 16 patients with healthy linguoverted mandibular premolars using maxillary extraction forceps. The ease of extraction increased and resulted in uneventful postoperative healing in all patients. The authors suggest this as a preferred technique for extracting mandibular premolars in linguoversion.
3.A retrospective epidemiological review of maxillofacial injuries in a tertiary care centre in Goa, India
Khandeparker Purva Vijay Sinai ; Bhadauria Trishala FERNANDES ; Vikas DHUPAR ; Francis AKKARA ; Anand Omkar SHETYE ; Khandeparker Rakshit Vijay Sinai
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2024;27(5):263-271
Purpose::Trauma accounts for the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide in the present day and may rightly be called the new pandemic. The prominent nature of the face exposes it to various traumatic injuries. A timely, prompt diagnosis along with employment of correct and quick treatment greatly improves the outcome for these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial injuries over a decade.Methods::The data were collected manually from the medical records of patients who reported to the tertiary centre from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2019. All injured patients irrespective of age/gender with complete hospital records of clinical and radiographical diagnosis of maxillofacial injuries were included. The demographic data, etiology, site and type of injury, and seasonal variation were analyzed. Data were tabulated into 6 age groups (0 -7 years, 8 -18 years, 19 -35 years, 36 -40 years, 41 -59 years, and > 60 years). Five etiological factors, i.e. road traffic accidents, falls, assaults, sports-related, and occupational accidents, were further evaluated based on genders. Facial injuries were classified into 6 types: panfacial fractures, mandibular fractures (subcategorized), midface fractures (subcategorized), dentoalveolar fractures, dental injuries, and soft tissue injuries. The monthly and seasonal variation of the injuries was also charted. Data were expressed as frequency and percent.Results::A total of 10,703 maxillofacial injuries were included from the tertiary centre from the period of 2011 -2019, including 8637 males and 2066 females, with the highest occurrence in the 19 -35 years age group. Road traffic accident was the principal etiological factor of maxillofacial injuries in both genders (80.5%), followed by falls (9.6%), assaults (8.0%), occupational accidents (1.2%), and sporting injuries (0.7%). Midface fractures accounted for 52.5% (5623 fractures), followed by mandibular fractures (38.1%).Conclusion::The current study describes a change in the incidence of maxillofacial injuries along with variation in the demographic data. The implementation of safety gears and stricter traffic laws along with public awareness may aid in the reduction of maxillofacial injuries.