BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated whether MSCs derived microvesicles (MVs) or (Exosomes) can exert therapeutic effects on an experimental model of cutaneous injury and explored the underlying involving mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three bilateral full thickness circular wounds were created on the back of two groups of dogs using 2-cm dermal punch. The wounds were at least 2.5 cm apart. Saline was subcutaneously injected in 4 places around each wound area in group-I (control), whereas an equal volume of exosomal solution of MSCs derived MVs was similarly injected in group-II. The findings demonstrated that MSCs derived MVs had significantly promoted cutaneous wound healing, collagen synthesis, and vascularization at wound sites. The application of the exosomal solution had not only promoted the generation of newly formed vessels, but also have accelerated their development and maturation leading to a faster healing process. CONCLUSIONS: MSC-Exosomes appeared to be a superior candidate for treating cutaneous wounds than their originator cells, and may represent a promising opportunity to develop a novel cell-free therapy approach that might overcome the obstacles and risks associated with the use of native or engineered stem cells transplantation therapy.
Animals ; Collagen ; Dogs ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells* ; Models, Theoretical ; Skin* ; Stem Cells ; Therapeutic Uses ; Wound Healing ; Wounds and Injuries*

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is widely accepted due to its high success rate, minimal need for re-intervention, and low incidence of pancreatitis. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and outcomes of primary EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Methods: In this prospective multicenter study conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, patients with unresectable MDBO were assigned to either EUS-CDS or ERCP. Technical and clinical success were the primary endpoints. Results: A total of 73 patients at three tertiary centers were enrolled, of whom 37 underwent EUS-CDS and 36 underwent ERCP. Pancreatic cancer was present in 62 patients (84.9%). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable (97.3% and 97.2% for EUS-CDS vs. 94.4% and 100% for ERCP, respectively), with nearly the same procedure duration (P = 0.982) and with no significant difference in adverse events between both groups.Pancreatitis occurred in one patient after ERCP. Short-term re-intervention (within 3 months) was only required in two patients in the EUS-CDS group. Conclusion Primary EUS-CDS—even in developing countries—is feasible, with comparable safety and non-inferior efficacy to ERCP for palliation in MDBO cases if a highly experienced team is present.

Purpose: This study aims to validate the use of ProAnalyst (Xcitex Inc.), a software for professional motion analysts to assess the performance of surgical interns while performing the peg transfer task in a simulator box for safe practice in real minimally invasive surgery. Methods: A correlation study was conducted in a multidisciplinary skills simulation lab at the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to February 2020. Forty-one interns (i.e., novices and intermediates) were recruited and an expert surgeon participated as a reference benchmark. Videos of participants’ performance were analyzed through the ProAnalyst and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Two results were s analyzed for correlation. Results: The motion analysis scores by Proanalyst were correlated with those by GOALS for novices (r=–0.62925, P=0.009), and Intermediates (r= –0.53422, P=0.033). Both assessment methods differentiated the participants’ performance based on their experience level. Conclusion The motion analysis scoring method with Proanalyst provides an objective, time-efficient, and reproducible assessment of interns’ performance, and comparable to GOALS. It may require initial training and set-up; however, it eliminates the need for expert surgeon judgment.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is widely accepted due to its high success rate, minimal need for re-intervention, and low incidence of pancreatitis. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and outcomes of primary EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Methods: In this prospective multicenter study conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, patients with unresectable MDBO were assigned to either EUS-CDS or ERCP. Technical and clinical success were the primary endpoints. Results: A total of 73 patients at three tertiary centers were enrolled, of whom 37 underwent EUS-CDS and 36 underwent ERCP. Pancreatic cancer was present in 62 patients (84.9%). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable (97.3% and 97.2% for EUS-CDS vs. 94.4% and 100% for ERCP, respectively), with nearly the same procedure duration (P = 0.982) and with no significant difference in adverse events between both groups.Pancreatitis occurred in one patient after ERCP. Short-term re-intervention (within 3 months) was only required in two patients in the EUS-CDS group. Conclusion Primary EUS-CDS—even in developing countries—is feasible, with comparable safety and non-inferior efficacy to ERCP for palliation in MDBO cases if a highly experienced team is present.

Purpose: This study aims to validate the use of ProAnalyst (Xcitex Inc.), a software for professional motion analysts to assess the performance of surgical interns while performing the peg transfer task in a simulator box for safe practice in real minimally invasive surgery. Methods: A correlation study was conducted in a multidisciplinary skills simulation lab at the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to February 2020. Forty-one interns (i.e., novices and intermediates) were recruited and an expert surgeon participated as a reference benchmark. Videos of participants’ performance were analyzed through the ProAnalyst and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Two results were s analyzed for correlation. Results: The motion analysis scores by Proanalyst were correlated with those by GOALS for novices (r=–0.62925, P=0.009), and Intermediates (r= –0.53422, P=0.033). Both assessment methods differentiated the participants’ performance based on their experience level. Conclusion The motion analysis scoring method with Proanalyst provides an objective, time-efficient, and reproducible assessment of interns’ performance, and comparable to GOALS. It may require initial training and set-up; however, it eliminates the need for expert surgeon judgment.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage is widely accepted due to its high success rate, minimal need for re-intervention, and low incidence of pancreatitis. Our objective was to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and outcomes of primary EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Methods: In this prospective multicenter study conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, patients with unresectable MDBO were assigned to either EUS-CDS or ERCP. Technical and clinical success were the primary endpoints. Results: A total of 73 patients at three tertiary centers were enrolled, of whom 37 underwent EUS-CDS and 36 underwent ERCP. Pancreatic cancer was present in 62 patients (84.9%). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable (97.3% and 97.2% for EUS-CDS vs. 94.4% and 100% for ERCP, respectively), with nearly the same procedure duration (P = 0.982) and with no significant difference in adverse events between both groups.Pancreatitis occurred in one patient after ERCP. Short-term re-intervention (within 3 months) was only required in two patients in the EUS-CDS group. Conclusion Primary EUS-CDS—even in developing countries—is feasible, with comparable safety and non-inferior efficacy to ERCP for palliation in MDBO cases if a highly experienced team is present.

Purpose: This study aims to validate the use of ProAnalyst (Xcitex Inc.), a software for professional motion analysts to assess the performance of surgical interns while performing the peg transfer task in a simulator box for safe practice in real minimally invasive surgery. Methods: A correlation study was conducted in a multidisciplinary skills simulation lab at the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology from October 2019 to February 2020. Forty-one interns (i.e., novices and intermediates) were recruited and an expert surgeon participated as a reference benchmark. Videos of participants’ performance were analyzed through the ProAnalyst and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS). Two results were s analyzed for correlation. Results: The motion analysis scores by Proanalyst were correlated with those by GOALS for novices (r=–0.62925, P=0.009), and Intermediates (r= –0.53422, P=0.033). Both assessment methods differentiated the participants’ performance based on their experience level. Conclusion The motion analysis scoring method with Proanalyst provides an objective, time-efficient, and reproducible assessment of interns’ performance, and comparable to GOALS. It may require initial training and set-up; however, it eliminates the need for expert surgeon judgment.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the disparity between video-based learning and lecture-based learning on Jordanian medical students’ satisfaction. Methods: We conducted this cross-sectional study using a web-based questionnaire adapted from Student Evaluation of Educational Quality survey. Using convenience sampling, medical students studying at the University of Jordan and Jordan University Hospital were recruited. Participants in either clinical or basic-science years that have completed the entire survey were included in the final analysis. Results: We surveyed a total 487 participants among which male to female ratio was 1.19:1. Participants perceived greater benefit in terms of learning, instructor enthusiasm, content organization, breadth of teaching, and quality and number of assignments when using video-based learning (all p<0.01). In contrast, face-to-face learning was associated with significantly higher benefits in terms of group interactions (p<0.01) and capacity for rapport building (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in perceived examination performance between the two learning modalities (p=0.11). Conclusion Video-based learning is the preferred learning modality among Jordanian medical students. Despite its dominance across multiple domains, it should be implemented as an adjunct to traditional classroom teaching for it is vital in the development of good communication skills and building rapport in medical students.