Although much advancement has been achieved in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, antiviral resistance is still a challenging issue. Previous generation antiviral agents have already developed resistance in a number of patients, and it is still being used especially in resource limited countries. Once antiviral resistance occurs, it predisposes to subsequent resistance, resulting in multidrug resistance. Therefore, prevention of initial antiviral resistance is the most important strategy, and appropriate choice and modification of therapy would be the cornerstone in avoiding treatment failures. Until now, management of antiviral resistance has been evolving from sequential therapy to combination therapy. In the era of tenofovir, the paradigm shifts again, and we have to decide when to switch and when to combine on the basis of newly emerging clinical data. We expect future eradication of chronic hepatitis B virus infection by proper prevention and optimal management of antiviral resistance.
Adenine/analogs & derivatives/pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Antiviral Agents/pharmacology/*therapeutic use ; Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Hepatitis B virus/genetics ; Hepatitis B, Chronic/*drug therapy/prevention & control ; Humans ; Mutation ; Nucleosides/*chemistry/pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Organophosphonates/pharmacology/therapeutic use ; Virus Replication/drug effects

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plays a pivotal role in the management of drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. However, it remains unclear whether TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy provides better outcomes than TDF monotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of TDF monotherapy with that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 76 patients receiving TDF-based rescue therapy for more than 12 months. Suboptimal response was defined as serum HBV-DNA level of >60 IU/mL during prior rescue therapy. Multi-drug resistance was defined as the presence of two or more drug resistance-related mutations confirmed by mutation detection assay. The relationship between baseline characteristics and virologic response (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL) at 12 months were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (72.4%) were suboptimal responders to prior rescue therapy, and 26 (34.2%) had multi-drug resistance. Forty-two patients (55.3%) received combination therapy with nucleoside analogues. Virologic response at 12 months was not significantly different between the TDF monotherapy group and TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group (p=0.098). The serum HBV DNA level was reduced to -4.49+/-1.67 log10 IU/mL in the TDF monotherapy group and to -3.97+/-1.69 log10 IU/mL in the TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy group at 12 months (p=0.18). In multivariate analysis, female sex (p=0.032), low baseline HBV-DNA level (p=0.013), and TDF monotherapy (p=0.046) were predictive factors for virologic response at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy showed similar efficacy to that of TDF-nucleoside analogue combination therapy in patients with drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B.
Adult ; Aged ; Antiviral Agents/pharmacology/*therapeutic use ; Cohort Studies ; DNA, Viral/blood ; Drug Resistance, Viral ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Hepatitis B virus/drug effects/genetics/isolation & purification ; Hepatitis B, Chronic/*drug therapy/virology ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nucleosides/chemistry/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Tenofovir/*therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult