1.Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia
Koichi HAMADA ; Koichiro KAWANO ; Atsushi YAMAUCHI ; Ryota KOYANAGI ; Yoshinori HORIKAWA ; Shinya NISHIDA ; Yoshiki SHIWA ; Noriyuki NISHINO ; Michitaka HONDA
Clinical Endoscopy 2019;52(3):252-257
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. METHODS: A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3–77] mm vs. 14 [3–63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5–202] min vs. 40 [8–249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8–157.2] mm² /min vs. 16.2 [2.4–41.3] mm² /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). CONCLUSIONS: GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD.
Anesthesia
;
Anesthesia, General
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Comorbidity
;
Deep Sedation
;
Esophageal Neoplasms
;
Humans
;
Operative Time
;
Phenobarbital
;
Pneumonia, Aspiration
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Dynamic Chest X-Ray Using a Flat-Panel Detector System: Technique and Applications
Akinori HATA ; Yoshitake YAMADA ; Rie TANAKA ; Mizuki NISHINO ; Tomoyuki HIDA ; Takuya HINO ; Masako UEYAMA ; Masahiro YANAGAWA ; Takeshi KAMITANI ; Atsuko KUROSAKI ; Shigeru SANADA ; Masahiro JINZAKI ; Kousei ISHIGAMI ; Noriyuki TOMIYAMA ; Hiroshi HONDA ; Shoji KUDOH ; Hiroto HATABU
Korean Journal of Radiology 2021;22(4):634-651
Dynamic X-ray (DXR) is a functional imaging technique that uses sequential images obtained by a flat-panel detector (FPD).This article aims to describe the mechanism of DXR and the analysis methods used as well as review the clinical evidence for its use. DXR analyzes dynamic changes on the basis of X-ray translucency and can be used for analysis of diaphragmatic kinetics, ventilation, and lung perfusion. It offers many advantages such as a high temporal resolution and flexibility in body positioning. Many clinical studies have reported the feasibility of DXR and its characteristic findings in pulmonary diseases. DXR may serve as an alternative to pulmonary function tests in patients requiring contact inhibition, including patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 or other infectious diseases. Thus, DXR has a great potential to play an important role in the clinical setting. Further investigations are needed to utilize DXR more effectively and to establish it as a valuable diagnostic tool.
3.Dynamic Chest X-Ray Using a Flat-Panel Detector System: Technique and Applications
Akinori HATA ; Yoshitake YAMADA ; Rie TANAKA ; Mizuki NISHINO ; Tomoyuki HIDA ; Takuya HINO ; Masako UEYAMA ; Masahiro YANAGAWA ; Takeshi KAMITANI ; Atsuko KUROSAKI ; Shigeru SANADA ; Masahiro JINZAKI ; Kousei ISHIGAMI ; Noriyuki TOMIYAMA ; Hiroshi HONDA ; Shoji KUDOH ; Hiroto HATABU
Korean Journal of Radiology 2021;22(4):634-651
Dynamic X-ray (DXR) is a functional imaging technique that uses sequential images obtained by a flat-panel detector (FPD).This article aims to describe the mechanism of DXR and the analysis methods used as well as review the clinical evidence for its use. DXR analyzes dynamic changes on the basis of X-ray translucency and can be used for analysis of diaphragmatic kinetics, ventilation, and lung perfusion. It offers many advantages such as a high temporal resolution and flexibility in body positioning. Many clinical studies have reported the feasibility of DXR and its characteristic findings in pulmonary diseases. DXR may serve as an alternative to pulmonary function tests in patients requiring contact inhibition, including patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 or other infectious diseases. Thus, DXR has a great potential to play an important role in the clinical setting. Further investigations are needed to utilize DXR more effectively and to establish it as a valuable diagnostic tool.