Objective: To develop a label comprehension study (LCS) of package inserts for over-the-counter medications in Japan, we evaluated whether it would be possible to detect differences in the level of understanding due to layout, and font size of different types of package insert using the interview method for LCS we developed previously.
Design: A face-to-face questionnaire investigation.
Methods: Two different types of package insert (including layout, and font size) for H₂-antagonists (package insert groups A and B) were used.  Study participants (≥18 years old) comprised consumers who visited a drugstore with a dispensing service in Saitama Prefecture.  They were randomly assigned to group A or B and divided by age range (young, 18-39 years; middle-aged, 40-59 years; eldely, ≥60 years).  First, the volunteers read the package insert with no time limitation and then answered 14 scenario-type questions during an interview to determine the level of understanding of the insert.  When both the correct answer and correct reason were given, the response was judged as correct.  The level of understanding of the package insert was calculated as the number of persons giving correct responses divided by all respondents.
Results: Questionnaire responses from 86 consumers (43 in each group) were obtained.  The mean age in groups A and B was 46.5 years and 47.0 years, respectively.  The mean level of understanding of the package insert (14 questions) in groups A and B was 50.2 and 38.1%, respectively.  By age range, the mean level of understanding of the package insert in groups A and B in the young group was 60.6 and 56.9%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.  However, the mean level of understanding in groups A and B was 56.9 and 35.0% in the middle-aged group and 26.3 and 14.5% in the elderly group, respectively.  The mean understanding in group A was therefore higher than that in group B in both age ranges.  The association between understanding and age within groups indicated that with increasing age, understanding was lower in both groups (group A, p=0.001; group B, p<0.001).  There was no difference in the level of understanding between the young and middle-aged in group A, but the difference in group B was greater than 20%.
Conclusion: By comparing two package inserts of products in a similar pharmacological category using our LCS method, it suggested that font size and layout influenced consumers’ understanding of package inserts.  It might be able to evaluate the difference in the understanding of the package insert by using our LCS method.

Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to improve exercise tolerance and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases, there remains low participation in outpatient CR. This may be attributed to the patients’ busy schedules and difficulty in visiting the hospital due to distance, cost, avoidance of exercise, and severity of coronary disease. To overcome these challenges, many countries are exploring the possibility of remote CR. Specifically, there is increasing attention on the development of remote CR devices, which allow transmission of vital information to the hospital via a remote CR application linked to a wearable device for telemonitoring by dedicated hospital staff. In addition, remote CR programs can support return to work after hospitalization. Previous studies have demonstrated the effects of remote CR on exercise tolerance. However, the preventive effects of remote CR on cardiac events and mortality remain controversial. Thus, safe and effective remote CR requires exercise risk stratification for each patient, telenursing by skilled staff, and multidisciplinary interventions. Therefore, quality assurance of telenursing and multi-disciplinary interventions will be essential for remote CR. Remote CR may become an important part of cardiac management in the future. However, issues such as costeffectiveness and insurance coverage still persist.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The influences of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the disease course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are still unclear. We therefore conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study to evaluate the safety of H. pylori eradication therapy for IBD patients. METHODS: IBD patients with H. pylori eradication from 2005 to 2015 (eradication group) and control patients (non-eradication group; 2 paired IBD patients without H. pylori eradication matched with each eradicated patient) were included. IBD exacerbation (increased/additional IBD drug or IBD-associated hospitalization/surgery) and disease improvement based on the physicians’ global assessment were investigated at baseline, and at 2 and 6 months after eradication or observation. RESULTS: A total of 429 IBD (378 ulcerative colitis, 51 Crohn’s disease) patients, comprising 144 patients in the eradication group and 285 patients in the non-eradication group, were enrolled at 25 institutions. IBD exacerbation was comparable between groups (eradication group: 8.3% at 2 months [odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–3.92; P=0.170], 11.8% at 6 months [odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.81–3.11; P=0.172]). Based on the physicians’ global assessment at 2 months, none of the patients in the eradication group improved, whereas 3.2% of the patients in the non-eradication group improved (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that active disease at baseline, but not H. pylori eradication, was an independent factor for IBD exacerbation during 2 months’ observation period. The overall eradication rate was 84.0%–comparable to previous reports in non-IBD patients. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication therapy does not alter the short-term disease activity of IBD.
Clarithromycin ; Cohort Studies ; Colitis, Ulcerative ; Helicobacter pylori* ; Helicobacter* ; Humans ; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases* ; Metronidazole ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: The purpose of this survey is to identify the individuals responsible for providing drug information (DI) services in medical institutions across the nation and understand their work conditions. Method: This survey was conducted across medical institutions nationwide, each with at least 200 general hospital beds. The survey focused on personnel in charge of DI services at medical institutions. Results: Responses were collected from 181 facilities, representing a response rate of 13.7%. The median number of full-time equivalent DI personnel at each facility was 1.2 (ranging from 0.2 to 7 (n = 180)). Among the respondents, 90 (49.7%) individuals learned their DI responsibilities from their predecessors, 81 (44.8%) individuals learned through participation in academic societies (excluding the Japanese Society for Drug Information), and 61 (33.7%) individuals gained their knowledge from academic journals, with these methods listed in their order of prevalence. The most sought-after knowledge and skills for DI personnel included the knowledge of adverse drug reaction reporting system (134 (74.0%)), basic PC skills (130 (71.8%)), knowledge of medical fees (128 (70.7%)), and expertise in disease treatment methods (125 (69.1%)). Results and Conclusion: The findings of the survey revealed that several medical institutions with 200 or more beds have only one or two individuals in charge of DI duties. Apart from their core role in drug information, the DI staff members are expected to possess extensive knowledge concerning medical fees and related matters. However, they predominantly rely on their skills for DI operations. The tasks identified in the survey are tasks that are presently being performed by DI personnel at medical institutions. This underscores the pressing need for immediate attention to be given to acquiring the essential knowledge and education required for these tasks.