1.Noninvasive prenatal screening for twin pregnancy: an analysis of 2057 cases.
Yixuan YIN ; Hui ZHU ; Yeqing QIAN ; Jinglei JIN ; Jin MEI ; Minyue DONG
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2019;48(4):403-408
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the results of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome aneuploidy in twin pregnancy.
METHODS:
A total of 2057 women with twin-pregnancy between 12-26 weeks were recruited from Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou Municipal Women's Hospital and Jiaxing Maternal and Child Health Hospital during February 2015 to August 2018. The cell-free DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood sample for DNA library, and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) was performed by high-throughput sequencing technique. The fetal karyotype analysis or neonatal karyotype analysis was performed in pregnant women with fetal chromosome aneuploidy, and all subjects were followed up. The efficiency of NIPS testing for twin aneuploidy was calculated.
RESULTS:
NIPS revealed chromosome abnormalities in 11 out of 2057 twin pregnant women, 9 cases were confirmed chromosome abnormalities, 2 cases were normal and no false negative cases. In this screening, the detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, false positive rate of NIPS were 100.00%, 100.00%, 99.90%, 81.82%, 0.10%. Those were 100.00%, 100.00%, 99.95%, 87.50% and 0.05% for trisomy 21, 100.00%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 0.00% for trisomy18, and the specificity and false positive rate for trisomy13 were 99.95% and 0.05%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
NIPS can detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidy rapidly and accurately in twin pregnancies,and it is of value in clinical application.
Aneuploidy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
;
standards
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy, Twin
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
methods
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Trisomy
2.Preparation and evaluation of quality management samples for noninvasive prenatal screening.
Cechuan DENG ; Qian ZHU ; Ting BAI ; Ting HU ; Zhu ZHANG ; He WANG ; Shanling LIU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2022;39(2):176-180
OBJECTIVE:
To prepare a quality control sample for non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and evaluate its quality and stability.
METHODS:
According to the biological characteristics of cell-free fetal DNA derived from the plasma of pregnant women, the simulated samples were prepared by mixing genomic DNA fragments derived from individuals with trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 and background plasma. The samples were then compared with commercially made quality control products tested on various NIPS platforms and stored at -80℃, -20℃, 4℃, 24℃ and 37℃ for various periods of time.
RESULTS:
The simulated samples have attained the expected results and could be detected on various platforms and stored at -80℃and -20℃ for at least 30 days.
CONCLUSION
A simulated sample was successfully prepared and possessed good stability. It can be used as the quality control sample for NIPS.
Aneuploidy
;
Down Syndrome/genetics*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
;
Pregnancy
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Trisomy/genetics*
3.Retrospective and cost-effective analysis of the result of Changsha Municipal Public Welfare Program by Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.
Dongbo WANG ; Jun HE ; Yuting MA ; Hui XI ; Meng ZHANG ; Haixia HUANG ; Lijuan RAO ; Binbin ZHANG ; Chunmei MI ; Bo ZHOU ; Zhehui LIAO ; Lei DAI ; Xinyu OUYANG ; Yang ZHANG ; Haiyan WANG ; Xin WANG ; Zhaohui ZHANG ; Sui YAO ; Zhenyu TAN ; Jing YANG ; Wei ZHONG ; Nan WANG ; Jiyang LIU ; Liangrong ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2022;39(3):257-263
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the practical and health economical values of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in Changsha Municipal Public Welfare Program.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was carried out on 149 165 women undergoing NIPT test from April 9, 2018 to December 31, 2019. For pregnant women with high risks, invasive prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of pregnancy outcome were conducted. The cost-benefit of NIPT for Down syndrome was analyzed.
RESULTS:
NIPT was carried out for 149 165 pregnant women and succeeded in 148 749 cases (99.72%), for which outcome were available in 148 538 (99.86%). 90% of pregnant women from the region accepted the screening with NIPT. 415 (0.27%) were diagnosed as high risk. Among these, 381 (91.81%) accepted amniocentesis, which led to the diagnosis of 212 cases of trisomy 21 (PPV=85.14%), 41 cases with trisomy 18 (PPV=48.81%) and 10 cases with trisomy 13 (PPV=20.83%). The sensitivity and specificity of NIPT for trisomy 21, trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 were (97.70%, 99.98%), (97.62%, 9.97%) and (100%, 99.97%), respectively. In addition, 213 and 30 cases were diagnosed with sex chromosomal aneuploidies (PPV=46.2%) and other autosomal anomalies (PPV=16.57%), respectively. For Down syndrome screening, the cost and benefit of the project was 120.79 million yuan and 1,056.95 million yuan, respectively. The cost-benefit ratio was 1: 8.75, and safety index was 0.0035.
CONCLUSION
NIPT is a highly accurate screening test for trisomy 21, which was followed by trisomy 18 and sex chromosomal aneuploidies, while it was less accurate for other autosomal aneuploidies. The application of NIPT screening has a high health economical value.
Aneuploidy
;
Cost-Benefit Analysis
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
;
Pregnancy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Trisomy 18 Syndrome/genetics*
4.Analysis to the failure rate and causes of noninvasive prenatal testing based on high-throughput sequencing.
Wanjun WANG ; Honglei DUAN ; Wei DING ; Ying ZHANG ; Ruifang ZHU ; Jie LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2021;38(12):1171-1175
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the cause and pregnancy outcome for non-reportable cell-free DNA (cfDNA) results during non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
METHODS:
cfDNA was extracted from maternal plasma from 5898 singleton pregnancies at 12 to 22 gestational weeks and underwent NIPT with strict quality control standards. For those with sub-standard results, redraw or invasive prenatal procedures were recommended.
RESULTS:
Among the 5898 cases, 32 have failed for the initial NIPT, including 17 cases with substandard cffDNA%, 10 cases with data fluctuation after twice library constructing and sequencing, and 5 cases with unidentifiable sex chromosome abnormalities. For these 32 cases, 2 directly underwent amniocentesis, and karyotyping analysis showed both were normal. Six of the 30 redrawn cases finally turned out to be nonreportable. The final nonreportable rate was therefore 0.1% (8/5898). Of the redrawn cases, 1 trisomy 21, 1 trisomy 18 and 1 trisomy 13 high risk-cases were identified, which were all confirmed to be false positive. Among the 6 nonreportable cases, 2 women underwent invasive prenatal testing, and 1 was found to have a normal fetal karyotype, while another was found to have an abnormal karyotype of mos45,X[32]/46,XY[18]. The other 4 nonreportable cases who did not accept invasive prenatal testing have all reported normal child development at follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The main reason for nonreportable NIPT results was low cffDNA%. The high success rate of the redrawn cases has effectively increased the overall NIPT success rate and reduced the number of the cases necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. The initially nonreportable women may consider retesting after careful counseling with informed consent.
Aneuploidy
;
Child
;
Female
;
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
;
Humans
;
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
;
Pregnancy
;
Prenatal Diagnosis
;
Trisomy
;
Trisomy 18 Syndrome/genetics*
5.Practice of clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing based on cell-free fetal DNA.
Honglei DUAN ; Wanjun WANG ; Ying ZHANG ; Wei LIU ; Leilei GU ; Jie LI
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2022;39(3):264-268
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the application value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on cell-free fetal DNA.
METHODS:
The results of 2777 cases of basic and extended NIPT were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data and outcome of pregnancy were analyzed, in addition with the diagnosis rate and testing efficiency.
RESULTS:
Among the 2777 pregnant women, 1192 (42.9%) had accepted basic NIPT and 1585 (57.1%) accepted extended NIPT. With a failure rate of 0.1%, 8 and 6 cases were reported respectively as high-risk pregnancies for trisomy 21 and sex chromosomal abnormalities. Other genetic abnormalities were detected in 32 cases. The positive predictive value for trisomy 21 was 85.7%, and one case of 47,XXX was diagnosed among 3 women with high risks for sex chromosomal abnormalities. For those with a high risk for other genetic abnormalities, pregnant diagnosis rates of basic and extended NIPT were 71.4% (5/7) and 68.2% (15/22), respectively. Seven copy number variations (CNVs) were confirmed, including one pathogenic CNV, one likely pathogenic CNV and 5 variants of unknown significance. Among 6 cases with high-risk of maternal CNVs, 5 fetuses and the mothers were confirmed to be carriers. No CNV was detected in the remainder fetus by chromosomal microarray analysis, while its mother was a carrier of the corresponding CNV.
CONCLUSION
NIPT has shown a relatively high positive predictive value for the screening of trisomy 21 and maternal CNVs but with a limited efficiency for the discovery of fetal CNVs. For other genetic abnormalities signaled by NIPT, informed choice by the pregnant women during pre-testing consultation is recommended. Invasive prenatal diagnosis should be considered in the combination of NIPT reports and fetal ultrasound, while the residual risks should be fully informed.
Aneuploidy
;
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids/genetics*
;
DNA/genetics*
;
DNA Copy Number Variations
;
Female
;
Fetus
;
Humans
;
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
;
Pregnancy
;
Retrospective Studies