1.A study of the distribution of board-certified specialists in emergency medicine at accredited training hospitals for postgraduate education
Nobuo KURAMOTO ; Takeshi MORIMOTO ; Yoshie KUBOTA ; Yuko MAEDA ; Susumu SEKI ; Miyabi KITADA ; Toshiyuki ITO ; Atsushi HIRAIDE
Medical Education 2008;39(5):325-327
1) We compiled lists of accredited training hospitals for postgraduate education from the matching program list and of hospitals that employ board-certified specialists in emergency medicine.We then evaluated the number of training hospitals that employ board-certified specialists.
2) There are 1072 accredited hospitals for postgraduate education. However, only 546 (50.8%) of these hospitals employ board-certified specialists in emergency medicine.
3) Accredited training hospitals with emergency-medicine specialists are prevalent in Okinawa, Tokushima, and Kagawa prefectures.However, the prevalence of these hospitals is surprisingly low in metropolitan areas.
2.Major Qualitative Research Methods in Patient-doctor Communication Studies
Eiko Kobori ; Yuko Maeda ; Yoshie Kubota ; Susumu Seki ; Kaori Takada ; Nobuo Kuramoto ; Atsushi Hiraide ; Takeshi Morimoto
General Medicine 2008;9(1):5-12
Qualitative research has gained greater attention in medical research, but it might seem to be unscientific because qualitative and quantitative research methods are grounded in different paradigm.
In this article, we introduce three major qualitative research methods frequently used in studies of patient-doctor communications: 1) in-depth interviews; 2) focus group interviews and, 3) semi-structured interviews.
Each qualitative research method has different or common advantages and disadvantages, and which methods should be used depends on the study objectives. Qualitative research and quantitative research are complementary: while quantitative research explains the prevalence or variation of an issue, qualitative research explains the reasons or processes of that prevalence or variation. Combination of the two methods enables the gathering of more comprehensive and explanatory results.
3.Effect of Workshops for Preparing Multiple-Choice Questions for Computer-Based Testing Used in the Nationwide Common Examination Before Clinical Clerkships
Nobuo NARA ; Nobuhiko SAITO ; Shu KURAMOTO ; Eiji GOTOH ; Hiroaki NAKAJIMA ; Osamu FUKUSIMA ; Saburo HORIUCHI ; Toshimasa YOSHIOKA ; Yoshio NITTA ; Tatsuki ISHIDA ; Takeshi ASO ; Yasuichiro FUKUDA ; Fumimaro TAKAKU
Medical Education 2005;36(1):11-16
Computer-based testing (CBT) has been used in Japan since 2002 to assess medical students' basic and clinical medical knowledge, based on the model core-curriculum, before they start clinical clerkships. For effective CBT, multiplechoice questions must accurately assess the knowledge of students. Questions for CBT are submitted by all medical schools in Japan. However, only 40% of questions are chosen for CBT and used at random; the other 60% of questions are rejected because of poor quality. Toimprove the ability of medical staff to devise questions, workshops were held at 30 medical schools. The acceptance rate of questions from schools where workshops were held was significantly increased. The workshops were extremely effbctive for improving the quality of questions.