1."Diabetes Education Class IPE" -Challenge to promote new IPE (interprofessional education) with real patients-
Mina Suematsu ; Keiko Abe ; Hiroki Yasui ; Nobuko Aida ; Manako Hanya ; Hiroyuki Kamei ; Keiko Yamauchi ; Hiraku Komori ; Hisashi Wakita ; Kazumasa Uemura
Medical Education 2015;46(1):79-82
The WHO reported the importance of IPE (Interprofessional Education) in order to implement team-based medicine smoothly. Some Japanese medical educational institutes presented their IPE programs, which involved real patients, but most IPE programs used scenario-based or standardized patients. Moreover, few reports showed IPE programs for diabetic patient education. We created a new program, called the "Diabetes education class IPE" . Participants were 2 medical, 4 nursing, 4 pharmacy, and 3 dietician students. The students experienced the planning and management of and reflection on diabetes education classes. As a result of reflection, the "Diabetes education class IPE" was viewed as a useful IPE program.
2.Behavioral Intention Scale for End-of-life DiscussionsReliability and Validity Using a Web-based Survey
Nobuko YAMAGUCHI ; Naoko YAMAGISHI ; Miyuki AIDA ; Mitsuyo AZEGAMI ; Chihiro KAWAMURA ; Junko HOSHINO ; Yasuhiro ASAKAWA ; Eriko SASE ; Chiho SHIMADA
Palliative Care Research 2023;18(4):213-223
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the behavioral intention scale for end-of-life discussions. Methods: The scale items were developed according to the Theory of Planned Behavior. The drafts of the scale were created by Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and a preliminary test. In the main study, we administered a cross-sectional questionnaire on the web to the participants 20–79 years of age (n=860), living in Tokyo and six surrounding prefectures, and a retest one week later (n=665). We examined item analysis, calculation of a reliability coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha coefficient), construct validity, and concurrent validity of the scale. Results: Six factors identified by an exploratory factor analysis were; outcome evaluation, perceived power, control beliefs, motivation to comply, normative beliefs, and behavioral beliefs. The alpha coefficient of the overall scale was .96. The effect size that was determined based on known-groups validity and the correlation coefficient determined on the basis of concurrent validity were moderate. Conclusions: The reliability and validity of the scale were generally confirmed.
3.Cooperative learning: the perceptions of University A's nursing students and factors influencing those perceptions
Nobuko AIDA ; Sachi MIYOSHI ; Miki KAWACHI ; Mai YAMASHITA ; Koto YAMAZAKI ; Manako HANYA ; Keiko ABE ; Yukihiro NODA ; Hiroyuki KAMEI ; Mina SUEMATSU ; Hiroki YASUI ; Kazumasa UEMURA
Medical Education 2017;48(2):59-69
Background: To obtain suggestions regarding the methods of cooperative learning in basic nursing education, the nursing students' perceptions of cooperative learning and the relationship between such perceptions and their influencing factors were elucidated.Methods: Anonymous, self-administered questionnaires were conducted among 131 nursing students at University A in the Chubu region of Japan.Results: Binomial logistic regression confirmed that cooperative learning experiences in high school, learning satisfaction at University A, social support, styles of handling interpersonal conflicts, and undervaluing others in regard to assumed competence were significant influencing factors on the cooperative work recognition scale.Discussion: Factors, including professional identity, communication ability and students' past negative experiences, may have an effect on the recognition of cooperative work. This suggests the need for the continued investigation of the aspects of cooperative learning that take these factors into account.