AIMTo assess the efficacy and limitation of free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio (f/tPSA) at a single institution in Japan, focusing on the avoidance of pointless prostate biopsies.

METHODSIn total, 631 men between 44 and 93 years old (mean 69.8 years) with elevated PSA underwent power-Doppler ultrasoundgraphy-guided transrectal 10-core prostate biopsies at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, and their histological features were investigated with total PSA (tPSA) and f/tPSA.

RESULTSPCa was detected in 126 of 134 patients (94.3%) with tPSA of 26 ng/mL or higher. The detection rate was 59.4% for tPSA of 21-25 ng/mL, followed by 39.2% for 16-20 ng/mL, 30.0% for 11-15 ng/mL, 20.0% for 4.1-10 ng/mL and 7.6% for = or <4.0 ng/mL. f/tPSA of the PCa group was significantly lower than that of non-malignamt disorders in any tPSA ranges (mean 0.122 vs. 0.160, P<0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics analyses showed that f/tPSA (AUC:0.664) performed more valuably than tPSA (AUC:0.559) in patients with tPSA between 3.0-10 ng/mL (P<0.01). Although f/tPSA of 0.250 for the cut-off value might miss 1.8% PCa patients, it potentially spares 9.2% of unnecessary biopsies.

CONCLUSIONf/tPSA is more valuable compared with tPSA alone for the prediction of the occurrence of PCa. We recommend 0.250 as the cut-off value for f/tPSA in PCa screening for Asian men having so-called grey-zone tPSA.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Area Under Curve ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostate ; diagnostic imaging ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; analysis ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Doppler

AIMTo investigate the outcomes for Asian populations with locally advanced/clinical stage III prostate cancer (PCa) treated with currently prevailing modalities.

METHODSWe reviewed the record of 209 patients with clinical stage III PCa, who were treated at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital between 1992 and 2003. Treatment options included hormone therapy-combined radical prostatectomy (RP+HT), hormone therapy-combined external beam irradiation (EBRT+HT) and primary hormone therapy (PHT).

RESULTSThe 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 80.3% and 46.1% in all cohorts, respectively. The survival rates were 87.3% and 66.5% in the RP+HT group, 94.9% and 70.0% in the EBRT+HT group and 66.1% and 17.2% in the PHT group, respectively. A significant survival advantage was found in the EBRT+HT group compared with that in the PHT group (P < 0.0001). Also, the RP+HT group had better survival than the PHT group (P = 0.0107). The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates for all cases were 92.5% and 80.0%, respectively. They were 93.8% and 71.4% in the RP+HT group, 96.6% and 93.6% in the EBRT+HT group and 88.6% and 62.3% in the PHT group, respectively. A survival advantage was found in the EBRT+HT group compared with the PHT group (P = 0.029). No significant difference was found in disease-specific survival between the EBRT+HT and RP+HT groups or between the RP+HT and PHT groups.

CONCLUSIONAlthough our findings indicate that radiotherapy plus HT has a survival advantage in this stage of PCa, we recommend therapies that take into account the patients'social and medical conditions for Asian men with clinical stage III PCa.

Aged ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Japan ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) after a radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has not been studied in conjunction with oncological outcomes in relation to disease risk stratification. Moreover, the long-term outcomes of these treatment approaches have not been studied. We retrospectively analyzed oncological outcomes between consecutive patients receiving RP (n=86) and EBRT (n=76) for localized prostate cancer. HRQOL and functional outcomes could be assessed in 62 RP (79%) and 54 EBRT (79%) patients over a 3-year follow-up period (median: 41 months) using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI). The 5-year biochemical progression-free survival did not differ between the RP and EBRT groups for low-risk (74.6% vs. 75.0%, P=0.931) and intermediate-risk (61.3% vs. 71.1%, P=0.691) patients. For high-risk patients, progression-free survival was lower in the RP group (45.1%) than in the EBRT group (79.7%) (P=0.002). The general HRQOL was comparable between the two groups. Regarding functional outcomes, the RP group reported lower scores on urinary function and less urinary bother and sexual bother than the EBRT group (P<0.001, P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively). With risk stratification, the low- and intermediate-risk patients in the RP group reported poorer urinary function than patients in the EBRT group (P<0.001 for each). The sexual function of the high-risk patients in the EBRT group was better than that of the same risk RP patients (P<0.001). Biochemical recurrence was not associated with the UCLA PCI score in either group. In conclusion, low- to intermediate-risk patients treated with an RP may report relatively decreased urinary function during long-term follow-up. The patient's HRQOL after treatment did not depend on biochemical recurrence.
Aged ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Status ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatectomy ; methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; epidemiology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Quality of Life ; Radiotherapy ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome