This study examined whether exposure to nitrate in drinking water is associated with increased risk for bladder cancer by conducting a comprehensive literature research. A meta-analysis was performed with and without adjustment for confounding factors. Three groups (reference, intermediate and high groups) were established in terms of different nitrate concentrations in each included study. Separate relative risk measures were calculated for intermediate and high groups. Heterogeneity was assessed by using the Q statistics. Publication bias was evaluated by Egger's and Begg's test. Quality assessment for studies was performed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two cohorts, two case-controls, and one ecological study were included in this study. The adjusted data showed that the combined risk ratios (RRs) were 1.13 (95% CI: 0.81 to 1.57) and 1.27 (95% CI: 0.75 to 2.15) for intermediate and high groups respectively. For unadjusted data, the corresponding RRs were 1.18 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.57) and 1.29 (95% CI: 0.81 to 2.07). Sensitivity test indicated that results were significantly underestimated when Ward's study was included. No significant publication bias was found. There was heterogeneity among studies. The results suggested that there was no sufficient evidence that nitrate in drinking water is associated with increased risks for bladder cancer.
Drinking Water ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Nitrates ; adverse effects ; Risk Factors ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ; etiology

Coronary Disease ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Nitrates ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Prognosis ; Vasodilator Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND: Few studies have explored the impact of perchlorate, nitrate, and thiocyanate (PNT) on kidney function. This study aimed to evaluate the association of urinary levels of PNT with renal function as well as the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among the general population in the United States. METHODS: This analysis included data from 13,373 adults (≥20 years) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 to 2016. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression, to explore the associations of urinary PNT with kidney function. Restricted cubic splines were used to assess the potentially non-linear relationships between PNT exposure and outcomes. RESULTS: After traditional creatinine adjustment, perchlorate (P-traditional) was positively associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (adjusted β: 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.25 to 3.26; P  < 0.001), and negatively associated with urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) (adjusted β: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.02; P  = 0.001) in adjusted models. After both traditional and covariate-adjusted creatinine adjustment, urinary nitrate and thiocyanate were positively associated with eGFR (all P values <0.05), and negatively associated with ACR (all P values <0.05); higher nitrate or thiocyanate was associated with a lower risk of CKD (all P values <0.001). Moreover, there were L-shaped non-linear associations between nitrate, thiocyanate, and outcomes. In the adjusted models, for quartiles of PNT, statistically significant dose-response associations were observed in most relationships. Most results were consistent in the stratified and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Exposures to PNT might be associated with kidney function, indicating a potential beneficial effect of environmental PNT exposure (especially nitrate and thiocyanate) on the human kidney.
Adult ; Humans ; United States/epidemiology* ; Nitrates/adverse effects* ; Nutrition Surveys ; Thiocyanates/urine* ; Perchlorates/urine* ; Creatinine ; Environmental Exposure ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology* ; Logistic Models

Traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 selective inhibitors are among the most widely used drugs. However, their significant side effects in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems limited the use of these drugs. Recently, research and development of NO-donating NSAIDs (NO-NSAIDs) have become one of the most important strategies to reduce these side effects. NO-NSAIDs may exert a broad range of positive effects in terms of NO-mediated gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety as well as comparable or increased anti-inflammatory, analgesic properties relative to NSAIDs. This review briefly deals with chemistry of NO-NSAIDs, more details are focused on biological significance, mechanism of action, and therapeutic potential of this novel class of drugs.
Acetaminophen ; analogs & derivatives ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; Aspirin ; analogs & derivatives ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Cardiotonic Agents ; pharmacology ; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors ; adverse effects ; pharmacology ; Flurbiprofen ; analogs & derivatives ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Ibuprofen ; analogs & derivatives ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Naproxen ; analogs & derivatives ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Nitrates ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Nitric Oxide Donors ; pharmacology

Animals ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Creatine Kinase, MB Form ; blood ; Heart ; drug effects ; Interleukin-1 ; blood ; Interleukin-6 ; blood ; Lycium ; chemistry ; Male ; Nitrates ; blood ; Oxidative Stress ; drug effects ; Physical Conditioning, Animal ; adverse effects ; Plant Extracts ; therapeutic use ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reactive Oxygen Species ; blood

PURPOSE: Calcium channel blockers diltiazem and nitrate have been used as selective coronary vasodilators for patients with significant coronary artery spasm (CAS). However, no study has compared the efficacy of diltiazem alone versus diltiazem with nitrate for long-term clinical outcomes in patients with CAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2741 consecutive patients without significant coronary artery disease with positive CAS by acetylcholine (Ach) provocation test between November 2004 and May 2014 were enrolled. Significant CAS was defined as a narrowing of >70% by incremental intracoronary injection of 20, 50, and 100 µg of Ach into the left coronary artery. Patients were assigned to either the diltiazem group (n=842) or the dual group (diltiazem with nitrate, n=1899) at physician discretion. To adjust for potential confounders, a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed using the logistic regression model. After PSM analysis, two well-balanced groups (811 pairs, n=1622, C-statistic=0.708) were generated. RESULTS: At 5 years, there were similar incidences in primary endpoints, including mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and recurrent angina requiring repeat coronary angiography between the two groups. Diltiazem alone was not an independent predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events or recurrent angina requiring repeat coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: Despite the expected improvement of endothelial function and the relief of CAS, the combination of diltiazem and nitrate treatment was not superior to diltiazem alone in reducing mortality and cardiovascular events up to 5 years in patients with significant CAS.
Acetylcholine ; Aged ; Angina Pectoris/diagnosis ; Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use ; Cardiovascular Agents/*therapeutic use ; Coronary Angiography/adverse effects ; Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control ; Coronary Vasospasm/diagnosis/*drug therapy ; Diltiazem/*therapeutic use ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control ; Nitrates/*therapeutic use ; Propensity Score ; Time Factors ; Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use