1.Management of symptomatic radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery and clinical factors for treatment response
Mutlay SAYAN ; Teuta Zoto MUSTAFAYEV ; Aykut BALMUK ; Swati MAMIDANNA ; Erva Seyma Sare KEFELIOGLU ; Gorkem GUNGOR ; Anupama CHUNDURY ; Nisha OHRI ; Ercan KARAARSLAN ; Enis OZYAR ; Banu ATALAR
Radiation Oncology Journal 2020;38(3):176-180
Purpose:
Approximately 10% of patients who received brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) develop symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN). We sought to determine the effectiveness of treatment options for symptomatic RN, based on patient-reported outcomes.
Materials and Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of 217 patients with 414 brain metastases treated with SRS from 2009 to 2018 at our institution. Symptomatic RN was determined by appearance on serial magnetic resonance images (MRIs), MR spectroscopy, requirement of therapy, and development of new neurological complaints without evidence of disease progression. Therapeutic interventions for symptomatic RN included corticosteroids, bevacizumab and/or surgical resection. Patient-reported therapeutic outcomes were graded as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response.
Results:
Twenty-six patients experienced symptomatic RN after treatment of 50 separate lesions. The mean prescription dose was 22 Gy (range, 15 to 30 Gy) in 1 to 5 fractions (median, 1 fraction). Of the 12 patients managed with corticosteroids, 6 patients (50%) reported CR and 4 patients (33%) PR. Of the 6 patients managed with bevacizumab, 3 patients (50%) reported CR and 1 patient (18%) PR. Of the 8 patients treated with surgical resection, all reported CR (100%). Other than surgical resection, age ≥54 years (median, 54 years; range, 35 to 81 years) was associated with CR (odds ratio = 8.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–15.39; p = 0.027).
Conclusion
Corticosteroids and bevacizumab are commonly utilized treatment modalities with excellent response rate. Our results suggest that patient’s age is associated with response rate and could help guide treatment decisions for unresectable symptomatic RN.
2.Clinical management of uveal melanoma: a comprehensive review with a treatment algorithm
Mutlay SAYAN ; Swati MAMIDANNA ; Damla ONCEL ; Imraan JAN ; Irina VERGALASOVA ; Joseph WEINER ; Nisha OHRI ; Banu ACIKALIN ; Anupama CHUNDURY
Radiation Oncology Journal 2020;38(3):162-169
Uveal melanoma (UM), the most frequently occurring non-cutaneous melanoma and most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, arises from the melanocytes of the choroid in approximately 95% of cases. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is vital as primary tumor size is one of the key factors associated with survival. Despite recent advances in management, more than half of the patients develop metastatic disease which portends poor survival. Currently, treatment options for UM include local resection, enucleation, plaque brachytherapy, and/or particle beam radiotherapy (RT). Enucleation was initially the standard of care in the management of UM, but a shift towards eye-preserving therapeutic choices such as RT and local resection has been noted in recent decades. Plaque brachytherapy, a form of localized RT, is the most popular option and is now the preferred treatment modality for UM. In this review we discuss the etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and diagnosis of UM and place a special emphasis on therapeutic options. Furthermore, we review the current literature on UM management and propose a functional treatment algorithm for non-metastatic disease.
3.Evaluation of response to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with radioresistant brain metastases
Mutlay SAYAN ; Teuta ZOTO MUSTAFAYEV ; Bilgehan SAHIN ; Erva Seyma Sare KEFELIOGLU ; Shang Jui WANG ; Varsha KURUP ; Aykut BALMUK ; Gorkem GUNGOR ; Nisha OHRI ; Joseph WEINER ; Enis OZYAR ; Banu ATALAR
Radiation Oncology Journal 2019;37(4):265-270
PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma have been considered ‘radioresistant’ due to the fact that they do not respond to conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides high-dose radiation to a defined target volume and a limited number of studies have suggested the potential effectiveness of SRS in radioresistant histologies. We sought to determine the effectiveness of SRS for the treatment of patients with radioresistant brain metastases.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify patients with RCC or melanoma brain metastases treated with SRS. Treatment response were determined in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.RESULTS: We identified 53 radioresistant brain metastases (28% RCC and 72% melanoma) treated in 18 patients. The mean target volume and coverage was 6.2 ± 9.5 mL and 95.5% ± 2.9%, respectively. The mean prescription dose was 20 ± 4.9 Gy. Forty lesions (75%) demonstrated a complete/partial response and 13 lesions (24%) with progressive/stable disease. Smaller target volume (p < 0.001), larger SRS dose (p < 0.001), and coverage (p = 0.008) were found to be positive predictors of complete response to SRS.CONCLUSION: SRS is an effective management option with up to 75% response rate for radioresistant brain metastases. Tumor volume and radiation dose are predictors of response and can be used to guide the decision-making for patients with radioresistant brain metastases.
Brain
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
;
Humans
;
Melanoma
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prescriptions
;
Radiosurgery
;
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tumor Burden