1.Consensus on clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition).
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2023;45(7):575-583
Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common hematological adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy. CIN may lead to dose reduction and delay of chemotherapeutic agents, febrile neutropenia and severe infection, which results in increased treatment cost, reduced efficacy of chemotherapy, and even life-threatening morbidities. Assessment of risk of CIN, early detection of FN and infection, and proper prevention and treatment play a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of CIN-related morbidities, improving patient treatment safety and anticancer efficacy. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the expert committee of Chinese Anti-Cancer Association issued "the consensus on diagnosis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in China (2023 edition)", which is an update version of the 2019 edition, aiming to provide reference for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN for Chinese oncologists.
Humans
;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Consensus
;
Neutropenia/prevention & control*
;
Neoplasms/drug therapy*
;
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects*
;
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects*
2.Recurrent neutropenia induced by rifabutin in a renal transplant recipient.
Ji Yeun CHANG ; Eun Gyo JEONG ; Ji Hyun YU ; Byung Ha CHUNG ; Chul Woo YANG
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2014;29(4):532-534
No abstract available.
Antibiotics, Antitubercular/*adverse effects
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects
;
Middle Aged
;
Neutropenia/blood/*chemically induced/diagnosis
;
Opportunistic Infections/microbiology/*prevention & control
;
Recurrence
;
Rifabutin/*adverse effects
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Time Factors
;
Tuberculosis/microbiology/*prevention & control
3.Duration of filgrastim prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its predictors.
Sheng YANG ; Xiaohui HE ; Peng LIU ; Shengyu ZHOU ; Mei DONG ; Yan QIN ; Jianliang YANG ; Changgong ZHANG ; Xiaohong HAN ; Yuankai SHI
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2016;38(1):69-72
OBJECTIVETo analyze the duration of preventive filgrastim administration as support for chemotherapy and its affecting factors.
METHODSSingle institutional data from a phase Ⅱ clinical trial and a phase Ⅲ clinical trial of pegylated filgrastim were combined. In the two randomized cross-over trials, patients with previously untreated cancer received two cycles of chemotherapy of the same regimen. In the study group, the patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 100 μg/kg pegylated filgrastim, and in the control group, they received daily subcutaneous injections of 5 μg/kg filgrastim.
RESULTSIn 53 chemotherapy cycles, the median duration of filgrastim administration was (9.57±2.10)d. 83.0% (44/53) of them received filgrastim for 7-11 days. Patients with baseline absolute neutrophil count of <4×10(9)/L or body mass index less than 22 received a longer filgrastim prophylaxis(P<0.05). RESULTS of multivariate analysis showed that the baseline absolute neutrophil count is associated with the time of filgrastim administration(P=0.019). The most common adverse event of rhG-CSF was skeletal pain, generally mild and no treatment-related death occurred.
CONCLUSIONSThe median duration of filgrastim support for chemotherapy was 10 days. Patients with lower baseline neutrophil count require a longer filgrastim prophylaxis.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01285219.
Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Filgrastim ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Hematologic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Time Factors
4.Selective Bowel Decontamination for the Prevention of Infection in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Dong Gun LEE ; Su Mi CHOI ; Jung Hyun CHOI ; Jin Hong YOO ; Yoon Hee PARK ; Yoo Jin KIM ; Seok LEE ; Chang Ki MIN ; Hee Je KIM ; Dong Wook KIM ; Jong Wook LEE ; Woo Sung MIN ; Wan Shik SHIN ; Chun Choo KIM
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2002;17(1):38-44
BACKGROUND: Infection is still a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients receiving chemotherapy. Recently the main cause of infection has changed from gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria and the resistance to antibiotics has increased. This study aimed to access the effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) with orally absorbable antibiotics. METHODS: Ninety-five AML patients receiving chemotherapy at Catholic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center from March 1999 to July 1999 were randomly divided into the AP group (250 mg ciprofloxacin twice a day, 150 mg roxithromycin twice a day, 50 mg fluconazole once a day) and the control group for a prospective analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of fever was 82.6% in the AP group and 91.6% in the control group (p=0.15). Though classification and sites of infections showed no difference between the two groups, the catheter associated infection occurred more frequently in the AP group in significance. The time interval between initiation of chemotherapy and onset of fever, white blood cell (WBC) count at the onset of fever, duration of leukopenia (WBC < 1,000/mm ), duration of systemic antibiotic therapy, mortality due to infection and hospitalization period from the data starting chemotherapy showed no differences between the two groups. Infections due to gram negative bacteria decreased to 33.3% in the AP group (vs. 92% in the control group), but infections due to gram positive bacteria increased to 66.7% (vs. 8% in the control group). Gram negative bacteria showed 100% resistance to ciprofloxacin in the AP group and gram-positive bacteria showed 90-100% resistance to erythromycin, regardless of the presence of AP. CONCLUSION: The AP could not reduce the occurrence of infection or infection associated death in AML patients receiving chemotherapy. On considering increased gram-positive infection and resistance to fluoroquinolone and macrolide, routine prescription of AP should be reconsidered. Further studies that assess the effectiveness of AP in other malignancies, aplastic anemia and bone marrow transplantation are required.
Adult
;
Anti-Infective Agents, Fluoroquinolone/*therapeutic use
;
*Antibiotic Prophylaxis
;
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control
;
Ciprofloxacin/*therapeutic use
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Female
;
Fever/epidemiology/etiology
;
Fluconazole/therapeutic use
;
Human
;
Incidence
;
Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute/*complications/drug therapy
;
Male
;
Middle Age
;
Neutropenia/chemically induced/*complications
;
Prospective Studies
;
Roxithromycin/therapeutic use
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Efficacy of once-per-cycle administration pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a phase I trial.
Sheng YANG ; Yuan-Kai SHI ; Peng LIU ; Xiao-Hong HAN ; Xiao-Hui HE ; Yong-Ming CAI ; Zheng-Min CHEN
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2006;28(3):339-344
OBJECTIVETo explore the efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
METHODSPatients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer or breast cancer and with normal bone marrow function were eligible for the trial. In the phase I trial, patients were to treated with two cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy every 21 days. In cycle 1, if absolute neutrophil count (ANC) dropped below 1.0 x 10(9)/ L with fever and/or ANC dropped below 0.5 x 10(9)/L, rhG-CSF 150 microg/d was administrated until WBC > or = 10 x 10(9)/L or ANC > or = 5.0 x 10(9)/L. In cycle 2, patients were to receive a single injection of PEG-rhG-CSF (30, 60, 100, or 200 microg/kg) 48 hours after chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic analyses were performed.
RESULTSAll the 16 patients enrolled (4 in each group) were eligible for efficacy evaluation. In cycle 1, 7 patients received rhG-CSF administration because of grade 4 neutropenia, while in cycle 2, there was only 1 episode of grade 4 neutropenia, which were in the 30 microg/kg group. In cycle 1, the mean ANC nadir of 1.37 x 10(9)/L occurred on day 13 in the 9 patients who received no rhG-CSF administration. In cycle 2, the mean ANC nadirs were 0.77 x 10(9)/L, 4.54 x 10(9)/L, 3.00 x 10(9)/L, and 5.56 x 10(9)/L, respectively, in 30, 60, 100, or 200 microg/kg group. The nadirs of the first two groups occurred on day 8 of cycle 2, while those of the other two groups appeared on day 7. After PEG-rhG-CSF administration, two mean ANC peaks were observed. The first one ranging from 20.87 x 10(9)/L to 33.61 x 10(9)/L in the 4 groups appeared on day 3 to day 4. In the 30 microg/ kg group, the mean ANC reached the second peak at 5.03 x 10(9)/L on day 14. The second peaks on day 10 in the other groups were 12.42 x 10(9)/L, 11.59 x 10(9)/L, and 18.92 x 10(9)/L, respectively. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed sustained serum concentrations of PEG-rhG-CSF during the period of neutropenia.
CONCLUSIONSPEG-rhG-CSF administration may decrease the incidence of grade 4 neutopenia and result in earlier and higher nadir ANCs. PEG-rhG-CSF has a potential of once-per-cycle administration. The ANC and serum concentration of PEG-rhG-CSF are consistent with neutrophil receptor-mediated clearance.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Carboplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; biosynthesis ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Paclitaxel ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Recombinant Proteins
6.A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase Ⅲ clinical study of PEG-rhG-CSF for preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer.
Binghe XU ; Fuguo TIAN ; Jingrui YU ; Yanqiu SONG ; Jianhua SHI ; Baihong ZHANG ; Yanjun ZHANG ; Zhiping YUAN ; Qiong WU ; Qingyuan ZHANG ; Kejun NAN ; Qiang SUN ; Weilian LI ; Jianbing HU ; Jingwang BI ; Chun MENG ; Hong DAI ; Hongchuan JIANG ; Shun YUE ; Bangwei CAO ; Yuping SUN ; Shu WANG ; Zhongsheng TONG ; Peng SHEN ; Gang WU ; Lili TANG ; Yongchuan DENG ; Liqun JIA ; Kunwei SHEN ; Wu ZHUANG ; Xiaodong XIE ; Youhua WU ; Lin CHEN
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2016;38(1):23-27
OBJECTIVETo explore the safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to provide the basis for clinical application.
METHODSAccording to the principle of open-label, randomized, parallel-group controlled clinical trial, all patients were randomized by 1∶1∶1 into three groups to receive PEG-rhG-CSF 100 μg/kg, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg, or rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg, respectively. The patients with breast cancer received two chemotherapy cycles, and the NSCLC patients received 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy according to their condition. All patients were treated with the combination chemotherapy of TAC (docetaxel+ epirubicin+ cyclophosphamide) or TA (docetaxel+ epirubicin), or the chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with carboplatin, with a 21 day cycle.
RESULTSThe duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 μg/kg and PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg groups were similar with that in the rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg group (P>0.05 for all). The incidence rate of grade 3-4 neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 μg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group, and G-CSF 5 μg/kg group were 69.7%, 68.4%, and 69.5%, respectively, with a non-significant difference among the three groups (P=0.963). The incidence rate of febrile neutropenia in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 μg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group and G-CSF 5 μg/kg group were 6.1%, 6.4%, and 5.5%, respectively, showing no significant difference among them (P=0.935). The incidence rate of adverse events in the PEG-rhG-CSF 100 μg/kg group, PEG-rhG-CSF 6 mg group and G-CSF 5 μg / kg group were 6.7%, 4.1%, and 5.5%, respectively, showing a non-significant difference among them (P=0.581).
CONCLUSIONSIn patients with breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing TAC/TA chemotherapy, a single 100 μg/kg injection or a single fixed 6 mg dose of PEG-rhG-CSF at 48 hours after chemotherapy show definite therapeutic effect with a low incidence of adverse events and mild adverse reactions. Compared with the continuous daily injection of rhG-CSF 5 μg/kg/d, a single 100 μg/kg injection or a single fixed 6 mg dose of PEG-rhG-CSF has similar effect and is more advantageous in preventing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Breast Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Carboplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; Cyclophosphamide ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Epirubicin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Incidence ; Induction Chemotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; epidemiology ; prevention & control ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Recombinant Proteins ; administration & dosage ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects