1.Prospective audit of febrile neutropenia management at a tertiary university hospital in Singapore.
Jing JIN ; Yee Mei LEE ; Ying DING ; Liang Piu KOH ; Siew Eng LIM ; Robert LIM ; Paul Ananth TAMBYAH ; Li Yang HSU
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2010;39(6):453-459
INTRODUCTIONFebrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Oncology/Haematology units. We launched a new protocol for FN management that incorporates risk stratification at our institute from October 2008. An audit was performed concurrently to evaluate the protocol and to define the epidemiology of FN locally.
MATERIALS AND METHODSCase records of all inpatients with FN between October 2008 and June 2009 were reviewed prospectively. Clinical and microbiological characteristics were collated along with outcomes and programme adherence. Statistical testing was performed using Stata 10.1.
RESULTSThere were 178 FN episodes (50 in patients with solid cancers) from 131 patients. Forty-two (23.6%) episodes were classified as high-risk according to MASCC criteria. Initial blood cultures were positive in 49 (27.5%) episodes, of which gram-negative bacilli (GNB) predominated. Overall compliance to the protocol was 56.7%, with the main issue being disinclination to use oral antibiotics as fi rst-line empirical therapy for low-risk episodes. Overall mortality was 7.3% and infection-related mortality was 4.5%. High-risk FN and the presence of central venous catheters were independently associated with bacteraemia on multivariate analysis, but there were no independent predictors of infection-related mortality.
CONCLUSIONSGNB accounted for the majority of bloodstream infections at our institute, unlike data from developed countries. Uptake of the new FN protocol was satisfactory, although the use of oral antibiotics as fi rst-line empirical therapy can be improved. A better method for predicting infections caused by antibiotic-resistant GNB is urgently required, and antibiotic resistance trends should be monitored to enable the implementation of more appropriate antibiotic regimens over time.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Female ; Fever ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Gram-Negative Bacteria ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Middle Aged ; Neutropenia ; drug therapy ; physiopathology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Singapore ; Young Adult
2.Intravenous Itraconazole vs. Amphotericin B Deoxycholate for Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Patients with Persistent Neutropenic Fever.
Sun Hee PARK ; Su Mi CHOI ; Dong Gun LEE ; Jung Hyun CHOI ; Jin Hong YOO ; Woo Sung MIN ; Wan Shik SHIN
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2006;21(3):165-172
BACKGROUND: Amphotericin B dexoycholate is currently the standard empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies and who also have persistent fever that does not respond to antibacterial therapy. The antifungal triazoles offer a potentially safer and effective treatment alternative to Amphotericin B dexoycholate. METHODS: We assessed the efficacy and safety of intravenous itraconazole, as compared with the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate, as an empirical antifungal therapeutic agent in a matched case-control clinical trial from June 2004 to August 2005. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 96 patients (48 received itraconazole and 48 received amphotericin B deoxycholate) and all the patients who received the study drugs were evaluated for safety. The baseline demographic characteristics were well matched. The overall success rates were 47.9% for itraconazole and 43.8% for amphotericin B deoxycholate (% difference: 4.1 % [95% confidence interval for the difference: -15.8 to 24]), which fulfilled the statistical criteria for the non-inferiority of itraconazole. The proportions of patients who survived for at least seven days after discontinuation of therapy or who were prematurely discontinued from the study were not significantly different between the two groups. The rates of breakthrough fungal infections and resolution of fever during neutropenia were similar in both groups. More patients who received amphotericin B deoxycholate developed nephrotoxicity, hypokalemia or infusion-related events than did those patients who received itraconazole (nephrotoxicity: 16.7% vs. 1.8%, hypokalemia: 66.7% vs. 24.6%, and infusion-related events: 41.7% vs. 3.5%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous itraconazole is as effective as amphotericin B deoxycholate and it is generally better tolerated than amphotericin B deoxycholate when it is given as empirical antifungal therapy for Korean patients with persistent neutropenic fever.
Neutropenia/drug therapy/*physiopathology
;
Male
;
Itraconazole/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use
;
Infusions, Intravenous
;
Humans
;
Hematologic Neoplasms/*drug therapy/physiopathology
;
Fever/drug therapy/*physiopathology
;
Female
;
Chronic Disease
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Antifungal Agents/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use
;
Amphotericin B/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use
;
Adult