History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Neurosurgery ; history ; Singapore

History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Neurosurgery ; history ; Singapore

History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; history ; trends ; Neurosurgery ; history ; trends

No Abstract Available.
United States ; Surgery/education/*history ; Physiology/history ; Neurosurgery/history ; Humans ; History, 20th Century ; History, 19th Century ; Blood Pressure Determination/history ; Bacteriology/history ; Animals ; Anesthesia/history

History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Neurosurgery ; history ; Philately ; United States

China ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Neurosurgery ; history ; methods ; trends

It is not an easy task to imagine what will happen to cerebrovascular surgery in the twenty-first century, considering the tremendous developments that have occurred during the past decades. This review paper is attempted to address the present and future of cerebrovascular surgery on the basis of author's experience of cerebrovascular diseases during the past 30 years. Cerebrovascular surgery has been recognized as a subspecialty of neurosurgery that requires utmost technical challenge and precision in all of medicine. Cerebrovascular surgery has achieved much that we can proud of. However, as forward-thinking cerebrovascular surgeons, our concern isn't with past glories. They would tackle questions of natural history, scientific assessment of therapy, outcomes sciences, and molecular basis of cerebrovascular disease. They would remain at the forefront of research in stroke and brain protection, and would succeed at the integration of endovascular, radiosurgical, and pharmacological tools into a truly multidisciplinary armamentarium.
Aneurysm ; Brain ; Cerebral Hemorrhage ; Natural History ; Neurosurgery ; Stroke ; Vascular Malformations

No abstract in English.
History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Neuralgia/history/surgery ; Neurophysiology/*history ; Neurosurgery/*history ; Therapeutic Human Experimentation/ethics/*history ; United States

Many approaches are being used for exposure of the anterior cranial base regions, ranging from extracranial to intracranial, such as transsphenoidal approach. This intracranial approach, developed in the beginning of the twentieth century, has recently become one of the most commonly used approaches after many incremental improvements. This thesis aims at examining the development of the approach and those who contributed to this procedure. The author also contemplate problems which may occur in the historical analysis. From the nineteenth century, advances have been made in anesthesiology, sterilization, cerebral localization and knowledge of anatomical and physiologic aspects of the skull base. The development of new knowledge and technique has helped to overcome obstacles, making surgery of the skull base through extracranial approach both technically feasible and therapeutically effective. To avoid serious postoperative complications after the extracranial approach, transsphenoidal approach had been developed in the beginning of the twentieth century. Transsphenoidal approach had been widely used right after its introduction. But it had not been used popularly since late 1920s in the United States. In early 1960s, this technique, spread from Europe, has regained popularity and become one of the most widely-used approaches. In the history of the transsphenoidal approach, it has been thought that the effort of Harvey Cushing and Oskar Hirsch, the endeavor of Cushing's scholars, several new attempts of otolaryngologists played an important role. However, comparing to great appreciation of neurosurgeons, especially Harvey Cushing on their significant contribution to the further development of this technique, the role of other pioneering doctors have been underestimated in previous historical studies on the transsphenoidal approach. It was because dynamical relationships among several specialties had influence on the historical analysis. This cases shows that historical analysis is influenced not only by past figures but also by current situations.
English Abstract ; History of Medicine, 19th Cent. ; History of Medicine, 20th Cent. ; History of Medicine, 21st Cent. ; Neurosurgery/*history ; Skull Base/*surgery ; Surgery/*history

The oral history helps researchers to fill the gap in historical documents in research on the contemporary history of medicine in Korea. More and more studies in history of contemporary medicine in Korea have come out using oral history of doctors and patients. Based upon the author's research on development of neurosurgery in late 20th century Korea, this paper discusses how to apply oral history to contemporary history of medicine, focusing on oral history of doctors in Korea. In this paper the author describes how to do and use oral history of key doctors and medical scientists in the contemporary history of medicine in Korea. The oral history can be a powerful tool to complement the written documents as following. First, from their interview, doctors and medical scientists often provide valuable information which historians cannot get from documents and written sources. As intelligent interviewees, they not only understand the purpose of research but also help actively the historian-researcher-interviewer. Second, the oral history facilitates further searches and often it leads to more findings of informants, and written and image material. More often than not, doctors and medical scientists do their own research on the topic and provide the historian with valuable historical source material from their laboratories, bedsides, family and friends. Third, interviews with medical scientists and oral material produced by doctors and medical scientists helped the researcher to understand and interpret the papers and written documents. Fourth, the subjective stories told by the medical scientists provide perspectives and historical source as narrative truth. Before a historian attempts to use the oral material as complementary historial evidence, he or she needs to cross-check the validity and of objectivity of the oral material. Oral material is produced through bidirectional intersubjective interaction between the interviewer and interviewee, and critical reflection over the relationship between the two is crucial. Especially the researcher should keep an eye on the possible bias and strive for the objectivity of the oral material with discernment and reflection, when she or he found the interviewees of doctors and medical scientists closely connected together and tied together in a web of relationship with a common interest or agenda.
Bias (Epidemiology) ; Complement System Proteins ; Eye ; Friends ; History of Medicine ; Humans ; Korea ; Neurosurgery