OBJECTIVE: Greater occipital nerve block (GONB) is a widely accepted treatment of primary headaches. Two ultrasound (US)-guided blockade techniques exist: 1) the classical distal nerve block technique performed medial to the occipital artery at the superior nuchal line, and 2) the new proximal nerve block technique performed at the obliquus capitis inferior muscle at the level of C2. Our study aim was to perform a head-to-head comparative study of these two US-guided techniques.METHOD: Forty-nine patients with primary headache treated in our university hospital were recruited. Patients were randomized into two groups of the classical nerve block and the new proximal nerve block techniques. The headache questionnaire was made to assess the intensity of the pain of headache attacks, number of days they experience headache, duration of headache, and amount of pain medication they consumed.RESULTS: In both groups, a decrease in the severity and frequency of the headache was observed. There was no measurable difference in outcome between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the classic and new proximal techniques are equally effective in decreasing the headache severity and frequency.
Arteries ; Headache ; Humans ; Methods ; Nerve Block ; Ultrasonography

The inferior alveolar nerve block is the most common method of local anesthesia for intraoral surgery at the posterior mandibular region. However, unexpected complications may occur when administering the local anesthesia. One of these uncommon complications is the fracture of the needle. If the injection needle is broken during the surgery, it should be removed immediately. However, this is one of the most difficult procedures. In this report, we present two cases of needle fracture during the procedure, and its successful removal under general/local anesthesia administration.
Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Local ; Mandibular Nerve* ; Methods ; Needles* ; Nerve Block

Efforts to apply augmented reality (AR) technology in the medical field include the introduction of AR techniques into dental practice. The present report introduces a simple method of applying AR during an inferior alveolar nerve block, a procedure commonly performed in dental clinics.
Anesthesia* ; Dental Clinics ; Dentistry ; Mandibular Nerve* ; Methods ; Nerve Block

Adolescent ; Humans ; Kearns-Sayre Syndrome ; surgery ; Male ; Nerve Block ; methods

Aged ; Humans ; Laryngeal Nerves ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Neuralgia ; surgery ; Ultrasonography ; methods

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block ; methods

BACKGROUNDThe use of traditional techniques (such as landmark techniques, paresthesia and peripheral nerve stimulator) for upper-limb anesthesia has often been restricted to the expert or enthusiast, which was blind. Recently, ultrasound (US) has been applied to differ blood vessel, pleura and nerve, thus may reduce the risk of complications while have a high rate of success. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of ultrasound guidance (vs. peripheral nerve stimulator, (PNS)) decreases risk of vascular puncture, risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis and risk of Horner syndrome and improves the success rate of nerve block.

METHODSA search strategy was developed to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting on complications of US and PNS guidance for upper-extremity peripheral nerve blocks (brachial plexus) in adults available through PubMed databases, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase databases, SinoMed databases and Wanfang data (date up to 2011-12-20). Two independent reviewers appraised eligible studies and extracted data. Risk ratios (OR) were calculated for each outcome and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the software of Review Manager 5.1.0 System (Cochrane Library).

RESULTSSixteen trials involving 1321 adults met our criteria were included for analysis. Blocks performed using US guidance were more likely to be successful (risk ratio (RR) for block success 0.36, 95%CI 0.23 - 0.56, P < 0.00001), decreased incidence of vascular puncture during block performance (RR 0.13, 95%CI 0.06 - 0.27, P < 0.00001), decreased the risk of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (RR 0.09, 95%CI 0.03 - 0.52, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONSUS decreases risks of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis or vascular puncture and improves success rate of brachial plexus nerve block compared with techniques that utilize PNS for nerve localization. Larger studies are needed to determine whether or not the use of US can decrease risk of neurologic complications.

Brachial Plexus ; Humans ; Nerve Block ; methods ; Peripheral Nerves ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; methods

BACKGROUNDThe adjunction of ultrasound to nerve stimulation has been proven to improve single-injection peripheral nerve block quality. However, few reports have been published determining whether ultrasound can facilitate continuous nerve blocks. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the addition of ultrasound to nerve stimulation facilitates femoral nerve blocks with a stimulating catheter.

METHODSIn this prospective randomized study, patients receiving continuous femoral nerve blocks for total knee replacement were randomly assigned to either the ultrasound guidance combined with stimulating catheter group (USNS group; n = 60) or the stimulating catheter alone group (NS group; n = 60). The primary end point was the procedure time (defined as the time from first needle contact with the skin until correct catheter placement). The numbers of needle passes and catheter insertions, onset and quality of femoral nerve blocks, postoperative pain score, and early knee function were also recorded.

RESULTSThe procedure time was significantly less in the USNS group than in the NS group (9.0 (6.0 - 22.8) minutes vs. 13.5 (6.0 - 35.9) minutes, P = 0.024). The numbers of needle passes and catheter insertions were also significantly less in the USNS group. A greater complete block rate was achieved at 30 minutes in the USNS group (63.3% vs. 38.3%; P = 0.010). The postoperative pain score, the number of patients who required bolus local anesthetic and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and knee flexion on the second postoperative day were not significantly different between the two groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONSUltrasound-assisted placement of a stimulating catheter for femoral nerve blocks decreases the time necessary to perform the block compared with just the nerve-stimulating technique. In addition, a more complete blockade is achieved using the ultrasound-assisted technique.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catheterization ; methods ; Female ; Femoral Nerve ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block ; instrumentation ; methods ; Ultrasonography

Although the acupuncture is not accepted medical therapeutic method in Korea, the author has been undertaken to treat various conditions of pain in an pain clinic at HANYANG University Hospital during 11 months from 1975 to 1976 to 62 patients who had not responding to conventional treatments such as medication, nerve block, physiotherapy and psychotherepy .etc. At the result of the electrical Acupumcture stimulation, 17 patients (27.4%) showed marked improvement, 21 patients (33. 9%) showed improvement and 21 patients (33. 9%3 transient improvement. The total confidence showed O8 patients (61. 3%), furthermore the longterm results of these follow up study will be carried continuously with the questioners within 6 months. And also the mechanisms of the stimulation produced analgesia reviewed with the recent reported several literatures. In conclusion, acupuncture can be used to relief of various pain for which coventional treatments are less effective. Acupuncture is relatively easy to learn and to practice by the acquisition of minimal knowledge of the technique.
Acupuncture* ; Analgesia ; Electric Stimulation Therapy* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Korea ; Methods ; Nerve Block ; Pain Clinics*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze any effectiveness, advantages, and the procedure of an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block via the proximal approach in patients suffering from shoulder pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients treated with nerve block between November 2015 and November 2016 were analyzed. We identified the suprascapular nerve that branches off the superior trunk of the brachial plexus, and found the suprascapular nerve, which is located in the fascial layer between the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle and the serratus anterior muscle. We then performed a nerve block. We evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pre- and post-nerve block, and the visualization of the nerve, depth from the skin to the nerve, angle of needle entry, as well as complications. Moreover, we measured the visualization of the nerve, depth from the skin to the nerve in a classic approach, and compared it with the proximal approach. RESULTS: There was significant improvement (p < 0.05) in the mean VAS, from 7.1 to 3.4, without any major complications. Compared with the classic approach, we were able to identify the suprascapular nerve much better (classic 25.5%/proximal 96.1%), and the mean distance from the skin to the nerve (classic 38 mm/proximal 12 mm) was significantly short (p < 0.05), and the mean angle of needle entry was 19 degrees in the proximal approach. CONCLUSION: In an ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block by proximal approach, the nerve and needle tip can be more easily identified, which increases accuracy; with a small amount of local anesthetic, more effective pain control can be achieved. Hence, this approach is an effective alternative pain control method for patients suffering from shoulder pain.
Brachial Plexus ; Humans ; Methods ; Needles ; Nerve Block* ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Pain ; Skin ; Ultrasonography