OBJECTIVETo understand the disease burden caused by cancers in Jinchang cohort, and develop effective strategies for cancer prevention and control in this population.

METHODSThe cancer mortality data from 2001 to 2013 and the medical records for cancer patients from 2001 to 2010 in Jinchang cohort were collected. The disease burden caused by cancer was analyzed by using mortality rate, potential years of life lost (PYLL), working PYLL (WPYLL), and direct economic burden.

RESULTSDuring 2001-2013, in Jinchang cohort, the five leading cancers ranked by mortality rate were lung cancer (78.06/100,000), gastric cancer (38.03/100,000), liver cancer (37.23/100,000), esophageal cancer (19.06/100,000), and colorectal cancer (9.53/100,000). The five leading cancers in terms of PYLL (person-years) and WPYLL (person-years) were lung cancer (3480.33, 1161.00), liver cancer (2809.03, 1475.00), gastric cancer (2120.54, 844.00), esophageal cancer (949.61, 315.00), and colorectal cancer (539.90, 246.00). From 2001 to 2010, the five leading cancers in term of average daily cost of hospitalization were gastric cancer (8,102.23 Yuan), esophageal cancer (7135.79 Yuan), colorectal cancer (7064.38 Yuan), breast cancer (6723.53 Yuan), and lung cancer (6309.39 Yuan).

CONCLUSIONSThe cancers common causing higher disease burden in Jinchang cohort were lung cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer, esophageal cancer and colorectal cancer. The lung cancer disease burden was the highest.

Breast Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; China ; epidemiology ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; Cost of Illness ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; Female ; Hospitalization ; economics ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; Lung Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; Male ; Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality ; Stomach Neoplasms ; economics ; mortality

No abstract available.
Chemoradiotherapy/*economics ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/*economics ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/*economics

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the accuracy and direct medical cost of different screening modalities of physical examination (PE), mammography (MAM), and high-frequency ultrasonography (US) for breast cancer among Chinese women.

METHODSThis study was designed as a blindly carried outcom parative parallel screening trial for breast cancer among Chinese women aged 35 years or older. Physical examination was conducted with the subjects in the first round of breast cancer screening. The negative cases were followed up approximately 1 year later and moved into the second round of screening. Using the results of biopsies and 1-year follow-up as the gold standards, the accuracy and cost indexes of different screening modalities were calculated. Data were analyzed by McNemar test.

RESULTSA total of 2 471 eligible women were included in this trial, and 14 breast cancers were identified among them. Mammography enabled to detect 11 cancers, high-frequency ultrasonography detected 9 cancers and physical examination detected 8 cancers. Considering the three modalities separately, MAM identified the fewest suspicious cases (52 cases) and detected the most cancers (11 cases). Using US alone at the first stage, followed by MAM when indicated, offered the highest specificity (99.7%)and correct positive predictive value (11.4%), meanwhile the sensitivity was 78.6%, and the mean costs of the screening modality in urban and rural areas were 291, 210 yuan and 886,050 yuan per cancer case detected.

CONCLUSIONSThe strategy of screening with US alone at the first stage, followed by MAM when indicated, may be the most suitable modality of breast cancer detection in most regions of China, but the cost is still too high to develop the breast cancer screening in some low incidence regions with limited health resources.

Adult ; Breast Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; economics ; China ; Early Detection of Cancer ; economics ; methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammography ; economics ; Middle Aged ; Physical Examination ; economics ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Mammary ; economics

This study was conducted to estimate the socioeconomic costs of overweight and obesity in a sample of Korean adults aged 20 yr and older in 2005. The socioeconomic costs of overweight and obesity include direct costs (inpatient care, outpatient care and medication) and indirect costs (loss of productivity due to premature deaths and inpatient care, time costs, traffic costs and nursing fees). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ischemic heart disease, stroke, colon cancer and osteoarthritis were selected as obesity-related diseases. The population attributable fraction (PAF) of obesity was calculated from national representative data of Korea such as the National Health Insurance Corporation (NHIC) cohort data and the 2005 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data. Direct costs of overweight and obesity were estimated at approximately U$1,081 million equivalent (men: U$497 million, women: U$584 million) and indirect costs were estimated at approximately U$706 million (men: U$527 million, women: U$178 million). The estimated total socioeconomic costs of overweight and obesity were approximately U$1,787 million (men: U$1,081 million, women: U$706 million). These total costs represented about 0.22% of the gross domestic product (GDP) and 3.7% of the national health care expenditures in 2005. We found the socioeconomic costs of overweight and obesity in Korean adults aged 20 yr and older are substantial. In order to control the socioeconomic burden attributable to overweight and obesity, effective national strategies for prevention and management of obesity should be established and implemented.
Adult ; Aged ; Arthritis/economics ; Cardiovascular Diseases/economics ; *Cost of Illness ; Diabetes Mellitus/economics ; Dyslipidemias/economics ; Female ; Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data ; Health Expenditures ; Hospitalization/economics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms/economics ; Nutrition Surveys ; Obesity/*economics/*psychology ; Republic of Korea ; Socioeconomic Factors

OBJECTIVETo investigate the economic burden of patients with acute and chronic hepatitis B, cirrhosis and liver cancer caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODSCluster sampling was used on cases consecutively collected during the study period. Questionnaire survey was conducted and information on the expenses during hospitalization was collected from the hospital records and through interviewing those patients.

RESULTSYearly costs related to patients with acute hepatitis B, severe hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis B, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma were 66.7, 138.1, 127.4, 151.7 and 377.2 thousand Yuan, respectively.

RESULTSfrom multiple linear regression model showed that the type of medical insurance scheme, annual days of hospitalization, classifications of HBV-related diseases and personal income were major influencing factors on the cost.

CONCLUSIONHBV infection caused considerable burden to families and the society, indicating that HBV infection control programs would bring huge potential benefits. The reform of insurance scheme should be administrated to promote social fairness.

Adult ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; economics ; China ; Cost of Illness ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; statistics & numerical data ; Hepatitis B ; economics ; Hepatitis B virus ; Hepatitis B, Chronic ; economics ; Hospitalization ; economics ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis ; economics ; Liver Neoplasms ; economics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases impose a heavy economic burden. We aimed to provide the first report on the health care utilization and costs of GI diseases in Korea. METHODS: We collected the data from all insurance claims database of National Health Insurance Corporation in Korea and the cause of death database in 2007 of Korea National Statistical Office. We compiled information about all digestive disease as a primary diagnosis on clinic visits, hospitalization, and cause of death from these databases. RESULTS: Seventeen million people (35.6%) had a diagnosis of GI diseases during the year 2007. Among them, the proportion of patients with upper GI diseases was prevalent in 54.9% (9.5 million patients/year). The 1/4 patients in out-patients clinic had any one of gastroesophageal reflux disease, irritable bowel syndrome and constipation. Thirteen percent of the total direct cost in 2007 was attributed to all GI diseases, which was 3,649 billion won (0.4% of GDP). The patients with hospitalization occupied by 5% of all patients with GI diseases, however, attributed to 58.9% of GI-related direct costs. GI malignancy was the major cause of medical expenses in hospitalization. Stomach cancer continues to be the leading cause of GI-related death in Korea. CONCLUSIONS: GI diseases causes a heavy socioeconomic burden with high morbidity of functional GI disorders in outpatients care and high mortality of GI malignancy in inpatient care. This report highlights the healthcare utilization burden of GI diseases for researchers and public health policy maker to create new directions of integrated researches and health care plan.
Databases, Factual ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/*economics ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/economics/mortality ; *Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization/economics ; Humans ; National Health Programs/economics ; Republic of Korea ; Survival Analysis

OBJECTIVETo compare FOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with cost-effective analysis.

METHODSCost-effective analysis was conducted based on the efficacy results of V308 clinical trial of FOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI regimen and the medical system price in Zhongshan hospital.

RESULTSThe minimal cost analysis showed FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 had the cost of RMB 206365.78 Yuan for each patient during the whole treatment period, and RMB 170468.89 Yuan for the FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI regimen. Incremental analysis showed FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 regimen could prolong one month of overall survival with additional cost of RMB 39885.44 Yuan in each patient while compared with the regimen of FOLFOX6 followed by FOLFIRI.

CONCLUSIONSBoth FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens are able to prolong the survival time of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but cost of such treatments are still quite expensive for Chinese patients. FOLFOX6 regimen suggests better cost-effectiveness than FOLFIRI.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; economics ; therapeutic use ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; economics ; pathology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; economics ; Humans

Early Detection of Cancer ; adverse effects ; economics ; methods ; utilization ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; adverse effects ; economics ; methods ; utilization ; Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; economics ; therapy ; Singapore ; Unnecessary Procedures ; adverse effects ; economics ; methods ; utilization

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study is to estimate the cost of cancer care after its diagnosis and to identify factors that can influence the cost of cancer care. METHODS: The study subjects were patients with an initial diagnosis one of four selected tumors and had their first two-years of cancer care at a national cancer center. The data were obtained from medical records and patient surveys. We classified cancer care costs into medical and nonmedical costs, and each cost was analyzed for burden type, medical service, and cancer stage according to cancer types. Factors affecting cancer care costs for the initial phase included demographic variables, socioeconomic status and clinical variables. RESULTS: Cancer care costs for the initial year following diagnosis were higher than the costs for the following successive year after diagnosis. Lung cancer (25,648,000 won) had higher costs than the other three cancer types. Of the total costs, patent burden was more than 50% and medical costs accounted for more than 60%. Inpatient costs accounted for more than 60% of the medical costs for stomach and liver cancer in the initial phase. Care for late-stage cancer was more expensive than care for early-stage cancer. Nonmedical costs were estimated to be between 4,500,000 to 6,000,000 won with expenses for the caregiver being the highest. The factors affecting cancer care costs were treatment type and cancer stage. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer care costs after diagnosis are substantial and vary by cancer site, cancer stage and treatment type. It is useful for policy makers and researchers to identify tumor-specific medical and nonmedical costs. The effort to reduce cancer costs and early detection for cancer can reduce the burden to society and improve quality of life for the cancer patients.
Cancer Care Facilities/*economics ; Cost of Illness ; *Health Care Costs ; *Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Korea ; Neoplasms/*economics

Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; adverse effects ; economics ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; Vaginal Smears ; adverse effects ; economics