1.Preoperative Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer.
Young Seon HONG ; Cho Hyun PARK
Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2005;5(3):139-145
Gastric cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Korea and comprises the second cause of cancer death. Surgery only can provide chance of cure, but most locally advanced cancers recur after a curative resection, even though important advances in the surgical and nonsurgical treatments of gastric cancer have taken place. Preoperative chemotherapy theoretically can provide the advantages of reducing the bulk of tumor, which might improve the R0 resection rate, and of treating micrometastases early. Also, preoperative chemotherapy is expected to render unresectable tumors resectable without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. There are many new chemotherapeutic agents available for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, but still the most effective agent, the optimal time and number of cycle for administration are still not known. The addition of postoperative chemotherapy through an intraperitoneal route and/or radiotherapy might affect the outcome of surgery favorably, but that hasn't been proved yet. A multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial should be performed to answer for those questions and to improve the curability of gastric cancer treatment.
Drug Therapy*
;
Korea
;
Mortality
;
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
;
Radiotherapy
;
Stomach Neoplasms*
2.Prognostic value of statin for cancer patients: A Meta-analysis.
Yamin LI ; Yongjiang LI ; Xianyang LEI ; Li LIU ; Dan ZHANG ; Siyuan TANG
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2015;40(7):770-781
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically evaluate the effect of statins on prognosis for patients with cancers.
METHODS:
Literature on PubMed, EMbase and Cochrane library was screened from the establishment of databases to March, 2015 to find relevant studies. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between statin use and all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality.
RESULTS:
A total of 25 studies covered 523 193 patients were identified and included in this Meta-analysis. The pooled effect showed that statin application was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in cancer patients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.89). A significantly decreased mortality in prostate cancer was revealed in subgroup by cancer sites (HR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.83). In addition, sensitivity analysis demonstrated a weakened association between statin application and all-cause mortality after excluding the studies with shorter follow-up duration (HR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.75 to 1.10).
CONCLUSION
A beneficial effect of statin on all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality is presented in patients with cancer. However, further studies are needed to confirm the long term effect.
Humans
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
;
therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Neoplasms
;
drug therapy
;
mortality
;
Prognosis
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
;
drug therapy
;
mortality
3.Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.
The Ewha Medical Journal 2014;37(2):75-82
Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in Korean women and its incidence has increased. Among the various treatment methods for breast cancer, chemotherapy plays an important role. The use chemotherapy to treat breast cancer began at the mid 20th century and first combination chemotherapy was conducted in mid 1970s. This chemotherapy reduced breast cancer mortality up to 25~30%, anthracycline and taxane based chemotherapeutic regimens are widely used. Chemotherapy could be classified to neoadjuavnt, adjuvant and palliative setting according to its aim and role. In this review, various drug therapeutic options and their backgrounds are considered based on neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic systemic therapies.
Breast Neoplasms*
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Drug Therapy, Combination
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Mortality
4.Photodynamic Therapy for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma:Does It Really Increase the Survival Time?.
Eun Kwang CHOI ; Myung Hwan KIM
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2005;45(6):446-446
No abstract available
Bile Duct Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality
;
*Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
;
Cholangiocarcinoma/*drug therapy/mortality
;
Humans
;
*Photochemotherapy
;
Survival Rate
5.Osteogenic sarcoma in children and young adults.
LeLe AUNG ; Aung Soe TIN ; Thuan Chong QUAH ; Robert W PHO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2014;43(6):305-313
INTRODUCTIONMore than 80% of children with osteogenic sarcoma (OS) relapse and 35% to 40% of them die within the first 2 years after diagnosis due to relapse. We investigated the incidence, treatment modalities used and the outcome of patients with OS treated in Singapore.
MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients with OS treated in Department of Paediatrics KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) and National University Hospital (NUH) between January 1994 and June 2011 were reviewed. Chemotherapy was as per the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) and as per the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre's (MSKCC) T12 protocols. Overall and event-free (EFS) 5-year survivals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
RESULTSOf 66 patients with OS, 19 (29%) of them presented with metastatic OS. The median age of diagnosis was 12.1 years with 5-year overall survival of 61.7% (95% CI, 48.1 to 75.3). The 5-year overall survival for those with non-metastatic and metastatic OS was 73.1% (95% CI, 58.1 to 88.1) and 34.7% (95% CI, 8.7 to 60.7, P=0.007) respectively. The 5-year overall survival for those treated as per the MSKCC T12 and EOI was 72.4% (95% CI, 52.6 to 92.2) and 54.3% (95% CI, 36.3 to 72.3, P=0.087) respectively. After controlling for confounding factors, patients with non-metastatic OS had higher 5-year EFS (HR, 0.228, 95% CI, 0.096 to 0.541, P=0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.294, 95% CI, 0.121 to 0.713, P=0.007) compared to those with metastatic OS. Non-metastatic OS patients treated as per EOI regimen had lower 5-year EFS (HR, 2.397, 95% CI, 1.012 to 6.678, P=0.047) compared to those treated per MSKCC T12 regimen.
CONCLUSIONMultidrug combination chemotherapy including high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and a multidisciplinary team approach introduced in 2003 in Singapore is well tolerated and can be safely delivered. The survival benefit between the 2 regimens still needs to be explored.
Adolescent ; Bone Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Osteosarcoma ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Survival Rate ; Young Adult
6.Surgical Management of Recurrent Cervical Cancer.
Alberto E SELMAN ; Larry J COPELAND
Yonsei Medical Journal 2002;43(6):754-762
The majority of patients with recurrent cervical cancer are incurable and treatment is based on the type of primary therapy delivered. Only a very small percentage of the patients with recurrent cervical cancer following primary radiotherapy will have central pelvic recurrences that are amenable to surgical resection and curable by pelvic exenteration. These procedures should be undertaken only after the completion of exhaustive attempts to exclude extrapelvic disease.
Cervix Neoplasms/drug therapy/mortality/*surgery
;
Female
;
Human
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy/mortality/*surgery
;
Pelvic Exenteration/adverse effects/methods
7.Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Improving Survival Outcomes for Esophageal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-analysis.
Dong-Bin WANG ; Zhong-Yi SUN ; Li-Min DENG ; De-Qing ZHU ; Hong-Gang XIA ; Peng-Zhi ZHU
Chinese Medical Journal 2016;129(24):2974-2982
BACKGROUNDThe effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) treatment for patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of NCRT followed by surgery (NCRTS) with surgery alone (SA) for EC.
METHODSThe PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched up to August 2015 for all the published studies that investigated EC patients receiving either NCRTS or SA, and the reference lists were also manually examined for the eligible studies. The risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI s) as effective size was determined to assess the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates (SRs), postoperative morbidity, and postoperative mortality. Heterogeneity was determined using the Q-test. The Begg's test and Egger's test were used for assessing any potential publication bias.
RESULTSOf 1120 identified studies, 16 eligible studies were included in this analysis (involving 2549 patients). Overall, the pooled results suggested that NCRTS was associated with significantly improved 1-year (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), 3-year (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39), and 5-year (RR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.18-1.56) SRs. However, the results also indicated that NCRTS had no or little effect on postoperative morbidity (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.82-1.05) and postoperative mortality (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.56-2.44).
CONCLUSIONSCompared with SA, NCRTS can increase 1-, 3-, and 5-year SRs in patients with EC.
Chemoradiotherapy ; methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Survival Rate
8.Clinical application of adjuvant treatment after operation in patients with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer.
Xia ZHANG ; Bin ZHANG ; Yajie GAO
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2010;13(4):357-362
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEThe efficacy of complete resection of the cancer for patients with stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited. Synthetic therapy is taken the lead in advocating at present. However, the value of post-operative radiotherapy is not still clear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival time and side effects of postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of stage IIIa NSCLC.
METHODSBetween December 2003 and June 2007, 52 cases that have completed followed-up data with stage IIIa of NSCLC received in the First Affiliated Hospital of Dahan Medical University. Twenty-three patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (group A) and 29 patients received postoperative chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (group B). Group A adopted platinum-based combination chemotherapy for 4-6 cycles. The chemotherapeutics included gemcitabine, vinorelbine and docetaxel. Group B used chemotherapy for 2-4 cycles and then received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). The prescribe dose of target volume was 50 Gy. The chemotherapy was same as for group A and needed 4 cycles in all. The impact of postoperative adjuvant treatment on survival and toxicity was observed in patients with stage IIIa NSCLC and the reason of disease progression was analyzed.
RESULTSThe median survival was 32.5 months in group A and 31.9 months in group B (P = 0.371). Progression-free survival extended about 6 months (P = 0.044). The survival rate was 87% at 1 year, 0.1% at 2 year, 33% at 3 year for group A compared with 93%, 69%, 45% for group B. The major side effects were hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities, including nausea, vomiting and neutropenia. There was no significant difference in these toxicities between the two groups (P > 0.05). Radioactive esophageal infection occurred in 17.2% of the patients. Acute and late radioactive lung infection occurred in 13.8% and 27.6% of the patients. All these toxicities were below degree 2. Distant metastases were the main reason of disease progression. There was no significant difference in the rates of local recurrence and metastases between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONCombined modality therapy should be the main therapy of stage IIIa NSCLC. The addition of radiotherapy can effectively prolong progression-free survival and don't highly increase the toxicities.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged
9.Combination Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Low Dose Leucovorin in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer.
Yoon Mi SHIN ; Hae Suk HAN ; Seong Woo LIM ; Byung Chul KIM ; Kyung Suck CHEOI ; Young Ook EUM ; Seung Taek KIM ; Ki Hyeong LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2005;37(5):284-289
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low dose leucovorin (LV) combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal carcinomas were prospectively accrued. Up to one prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Patients received oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, administered as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, followed by LV, 20 mg/m2, as a bolus and 5-FU, 1, 500 mg/m2, via continuous infusion for 24 hours on days 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or adverse effects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Between August 1999 and May 2004, 31 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the patients enrolled, 24 and 31 were evaluable for tumor response and survival analysis, respectively. The patients' characteristics included a median age of 59, with 6 (19%) having had prior chemotherapy. No patient achieved a complete response, but nine (38%) attained a partial response. Seven (29%) patients maintained a stable disease and 8 (33%) experienced increasing disease. The median duration of the response was 6 months. After a median follow-up of 9.6 months, the median time to progression was 3.8 months, with a median survival of 10.7 months. The hematological toxicities were mild to moderate, with no treatment-related mortality or infection. The major non-hematological toxicity was gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, low dose LV and continuous infusion of 5-FU is safe and has a cost-benefit, but is a moderately effective regimen in advanced colorectal cancer. A randomized trial comparing low and high dosages of leucovorin in the FOLFOX regimen is warranted.
Colorectal Neoplasms*
;
Disease Progression
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination*
;
Fluorouracil*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Leucovorin*
;
Mortality
;
Prospective Studies
10.Combination chemotherapy of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, and high dose leucovorin every two weeks in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Jee Hyun KIM ; Do Yeun KIM ; Se Hoon LEE ; Sook Ryun PARK ; Sang Yoon LEE ; In Sil CHOI ; Tae You KIM ; Dae Seog HEO ; Yung Jue BANG ; Noe Kyeong KIM
Korean Journal of Medicine 2003;64(4):452-458
BACKGROUND: Irinotecan is an active agent in colorectal cancer, producing 30~40% response rates when combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic colorectal cancer as first line therapy, however, the best combination schedules are not determined yet. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen) in recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer in Korean patients. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with measurable diseases previously untreated with chemotherapy other than adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled onto this study and received the study drugs between June 2000 and December 2001. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m2 over two hours on day 1) followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2 over two hours), bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 over next 22 hours) on day 1 and 2. Chemotherapy was repeated every two weeks until progressive disease. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients evaluable for response, 8 partial responses were observed with a response rate of 40%. Six additional patients achieved stable disease as their best response, and six progressed. The median time to progression was 5.0 months and median overall survival was 17.3 months. The most frequently observed grade 3~4 toxicities were neutropenia (18%) and diarrhea (4.8%). Two mortalities occurred, though not clearly related to treatment, before the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Irinotecan combined with LV5FU2 regimen was effective in advanced colorectal cancer with manageable side effects. Caution should be paid to elderly and poor performance patients to prevent treatment related mortality and morbidity.
Aged
;
Appointments and Schedules
;
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Colorectal Neoplasms*
;
Diarrhea
;
Drug Therapy
;
Drug Therapy, Combination*
;
Fluorouracil*
;
Humans
;
Leucovorin*
;
Mortality
;
Neutropenia