No abstract available.
Neonatology

PURPOSE: We tried to check the accuracy of references in the Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society and Journals of the Korean Pediatric Subspecialty Societies. We also wanted to know the citation patterns of authors by analyzing the frequency of cited materials. METHODS: Three journals were randomly selected from the 2000 issues of Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society and nine journals were selected mainly from the second half of 2000 issues of each Journal of the Korean Pediatric Subspecialty Societies for the study. Then the accuracy of references was checked with Medline. Journals before 1964, books, and journals which were not written in English were used only in the citation pattern analysis. RESULTS: Author errors were the most common(21.3%) among the reference elements. The next was title errors, followed by page errors, journal errors, volume errors and year errors. Total average error rate was 34.7% and we were unable to find journals in 89 cases(2.2%). The journal of the Korean Society of Neonatology had the lowest error rate(17.4%) and the journal of the Korean Pediatric Cardiology Society had the highest error rate(53.2%). The reference journals which were published and quoted in the most recent three years were only 612 cases(15%). Foreign journals were selected as reference(78.4%) more than domestic journals; The Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society was the most frequently cited reference(43.3%) among domestic journals. CONCLUSION: Authors are ultimately responsible for the accuracy of references and they should check the reference list with responsibility. Hopefully, authors also will have to use more domestic journals and recent journals.
Cardiology ; Neonatology

No abstract available.
Korea* ; Neonatology*

No abstract available.
Korea* ; Neonatology*

Artificial Intelligence ; Humans ; Neonatology

Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Consensus ; Neonatology

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities and differences in neonatal medical terminology between South Korea and North Korea. METHODS: This study was carried out by searching North Korean neonatal terminologies used in textbooks published in North Korea and comparing those terms with the South Korean terms used in textbooks in South Korea. RESULTS: The North Korean terms are different from the South Korean terms in that North Korean terms adopt more from the native language. There are also some differences in the inscription of foreign language, spelling and spacing. But, there are few terms that cannot be capable of communication. CONCLUSION: We could identify the major differences between South Korean and North Korean neonatal medical terms. We should take effort to establish unified terms by establishing more communication between both sides.
Democratic People's Republic of Korea* ; Korea* ; Neonatology

China ; Female ; Humans ; Neonatology ; ethics ; trends

Humans ; Hyperamylasemia ; physiopathology ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatology

Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatology ; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena