PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of foot reflexology on nausea, vomiting and fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHOD: The research was a quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent pre-post design and was conducted from Jan. 26, to Mar. 20, 2004. The subjects consisted of 34 patients with 18 in the experimental group and 16 in control group. A pretest and 2 posttests were conducted to measure nausea, vomiting and fatigue. For the experimental group, foot reflexology, which was consisted of 4 phases for 40 minutes, was given by a researcher and 4 research assistants. The collected data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA using the SPSS WIN 10.0 program. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in nausea, and vomiting in the experimental group compared to the control group over two different times. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in fatigue in the experimental group compared to the control group over two different times. CONCLUSION: Foot reflexology was effective on nausea, vomiting and fatigue in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in this study. Therefore, foot reflexology can be usefully utilized as a nursing intervention in the field of cancer nursing for breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
Vomiting/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Nausea/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Middle Aged ; *Massage ; Humans ; *Foot ; Female ; Fatigue/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Breast Neoplasms/*drug therapy/nursing ; Antineoplastic Agents/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Adult

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is the most important method for cancer treatment. However, chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has a profound effect on patients. In recent years, there have been new antiemetic drugs, such as aprepitant. We review the curative effect of aprepitant with tropisetron and dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving Cisplatin chemotherapy. METHODS: Observation is divided into three stages. Whole study phase (0-120 h after chemotherapy administration), acute phases (0-24 h), and delayed phase (24 h-120 h). The primary endpoints were complete response (CR) and complete prevention (CP) during the three different study phase. RESULTS: In the whole study phase, 86.02% of patients achieved CR; in acute phases and delayed phases were 89.25%, 87.1%, respectively. CP were 46.22%, 83.87%, 45.16%, respectively. Anti-CINV effect was significantly associated with age distribution (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Aprepitant with tropisetron and dexamethasone prevented effectively CNIV for patients receiving Cisplatin chemotherapy. This combination could improve the quality of life and the compliance of patient with chemotherapy.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Aprepitant ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morpholines ; pharmacology ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Quality of Life ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; prevention & control

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effects of wrist-ankle acupuncture combined with ginger moxibustion against gastrointestinal tract reactions (nausea, vomiting, and constipation) to chemotherapy in cancer patients.

METHODSA total of 60 patients with gynecological tumors treated by chemotherapy were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group (30 cases) underwent wrist-ankle acupuncture and ginger moxibustion, whereas tropisetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone were intravenously administered to the control group (30 cases) during chemotherapy.

RESULTSThe frequency of nausea in the treatment group was significantly less than that of the control group from the 2nd to the 5th day of chemotherapy (P<0.01). The anti-emetic effect in the treatment group was significantly better than that in the control group on the 3rd day of therapy (P<0.05). The incidence rate of constipation was significantly lower in the treatment group than that in the control group (P<0.01). Furthermore, the cost of therapy for the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.01). Only 1 patient manifested a post-acupuncture side effect in the form of subcutaneous blood stasis.

CONCLUSIONWrist-ankle acupuncture combined with ginger moxibustion could prevent gastrointestinal tract reactions to chemotherapy in cancer patients. In addition, the proposed method had fewer side effects, lower cost, and less risk.

Acupuncture Therapy ; adverse effects ; Ankle ; physiology ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Constipation ; etiology ; therapy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Ginger ; chemistry ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Moxibustion ; adverse effects ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; therapy ; Vomiting ; etiology ; therapy ; Wrist ; physiology

OBJECTIVE: There is no research regarding the appropriate antiemetic agents for female patients, especially those receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). We evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of a combination of 5-HT3 receptor with/without aprepitant in patients with gynecological cancer treated with the TC (paclitaxel and carboplatin) regimen of MEC. METHODS: We enrolled 38 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer and scheduled to receive the TC regimen. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, either palonosetron in the first cycle followed by granisetron in the second cycle or vice versa. In the third cycle, all patients received a combination of the 5-HT3 receptor and dexamethasone with/without aprepitant. RESULTS: When three drugs were administered, palonosetron consistently produced an equivalent complete response (CR) rate to granisetron in the acute phase (89.5% vs. 86.8%, p=0.87) and delayed phase (60.5% vs. 65.8%, p=0.79). With regard to the change in dietary intake, palonosetron exhibited similar efficacy to granisetron in the acute phase (92.1% vs. 89.4%, p=0.19) and delayed phase (65.7% vs. 68.4%, p=0.14). However, in the delayed phase, the addition of aprepitant therapy with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone produced a higher CR rate than a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (93.3% vs. 47.8%, p<0.001) and allowed the patients to maintain a higher level of dietary intake (93.3% vs. 56.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone in gynecological cancer patients treated with the TC regimen.
Adult ; Aged ; Antiemetics/*administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; Carboplatin/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diet ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms, Female/*drug therapy ; Granisetron/administration & dosage ; Humans ; Isoquinolines/administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Morpholines/administration & dosage ; Nausea/chemically induced/*prevention & control ; Paclitaxel/administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Quinuclidines/administration & dosage ; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists ; Vomiting/chemically induced/*prevention & control

OBJECTIVEThe efficacies of the selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) antagonists--ramosetron (0.3 mg) and granisetron (3 mg) in treating acute chemotherapy-induced digestive system dysunction were compared.

METHODSA total of 111 patients were enrolled in a single-blind, randomised crossover study; with data from 98 were used to assess efficacy and data from 110 to assess the safety profile. Ramosetron or granisetron was given intraveneously 15 min befire chemotherpy.

RESULTSThe ability of ramosetron to prevent emesis, nausea and anorexia was similar to granisetron during the first 6 h following the administration of chemotherapy, ciplatin or doxorubicin. However, during the first 24 h after chemotherapy, significant differences between ramosetron and granisetron appeared: emetic episode (P = 0.068), nausea (P = 0.006), and anorexia (P = 0.048) remained lower in ramosetron-treated patients. The safety profile of ramosetron was similar to that of granisetron and adverse events in both groups were generally mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONRamosetron is more potent and longer-lasting than granisetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced digestive disturbances.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anorexia ; chemically induced ; drug therapy ; Antiemetics ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; Benzimidazoles ; therapeutic use ; Cisplatin ; adverse effects ; Cross-Over Studies ; Doxorubicin ; adverse effects ; Female ; Granisetron ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Serotonin Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Single-Blind Method ; Vomiting, Anticipatory ; etiology ; prevention & control

OBJECTIVETo observe the effect of thalidomide in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by emetogenic cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODSThis study was carried out as a prospective, randomized control clinical trial. 61 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were scheduled to receive chemotherapy (gemcitabin 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. gtt d1, 8 and CDDP 75 mg/m(2) i.v. gtt d1, GP regimen). The patients were randomly divided into a treatment and control groups. All patients in both groups received ramosetron 0.3 mg intravenously (i.v.) and metoclopramide 20 mg intramuscularly (i.m.) 30 min prior to chemotherapy to prevent nausea and emesis on day 1. In the treatment group, addition of thalidomide (50 mg p.o. bid) were administered on days 1 to 5 after the start of chemotherapy.

RESULTSAcute nausea was effectively controlled in 74.2% of the patients in the control group and in 90.0% of treatment group. Acute vomiting was effectively controlled in 90.3% of the patients in the control group and in 93.3% of treatment group. No statistically significant differences showed in effective control of acute nausea and vomiting between the 2 groups (P = 0.108; P = 1.000). Delayed nausea was effectively controlled in 19.4% of the patients in control group and in 56.7% in the treatment group. Delayed vomiting was effectively controlled in 48.4% of the patients in control group and 76.7% in treatment group. Statistically there was a significant differences in effective control of delayed nausea and vomiting between the 2 groups (P = 0.003, P = 0.023). Both antiemetic regimens were well tolerated, and no significant difference was observed in adverse events between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONOur results demonstrate that thalidomide is highly effective in controlling delayed nausea and vomiting episodes in patients induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Moreover, no serious toxic effects are induced by this treatment.

Antiemetics ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; analogs & derivatives ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; prevention & control ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prospective Studies ; Thalidomide ; therapeutic use ; Vomiting ; chemically induced ; prevention & control

We designed a randomized, double-blinded study to determine the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: ephedrine group (n=21) and control group (n=21). Intravenous preload of 15 mL/kg lactated Ringer's solution was given. Shortly after the spinal injection, ephedrine 0.5 mg/kg or saline was injected intravenous for 60 sec. The mean of highest and lowest heart rate in the ephedrine group was higher than those of control group (P<0.05). There were significant lower incidences of hypotension and nausea and vomiting in the ephedrine group compared with the control group (8 [38.1%] vs. 18 [85.7%]); (4 [19%] vs. 12 [57.1%], respectively) (P<0.05). The first rescue ephedrine time in the ephedrine group was significantly longer (14.9+/-7.1 min vs. 7.9+/-5.4 min) than that of the control group (P<0.05). Neonatal outcome were similar between the study groups. These findings suggest, the prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrine given at the time of intrathecal block after a crystalloid fluid preload, plus rescue boluses reduce the incidence of hypotension.
Adult ; *Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; *Cesarean Section ; Ephedrine/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Humans ; Hypotension/chemically induced/prevention & control ; Injections, Intravenous ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control ; Pregnancy ; Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use