There is no universally accepted regimen for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, the maximal medical treatment has shown that it can reduce the surgical treatment rate for CRS. The therapeutic goals of systemic medical management in CRS include reduction of the mucosal inflammation, eradicating of infecting pathogens, and restoring the mucociliary function and mucosal aeration. Medical treatment requires the combination of oral and topical managements. Systemic and topical antibiotics, oral and topical steroids, nasal lavage have been used medical treatment.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Inflammation ; Nasal Lavage ; Steroids

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nasal irrigation, a conventional therapy for both surgical and nonsurgical patients with a history of chronic rhinosinusitis, aids in the clearance of secretions, debris, and intranasal crusts. This is important in the postoperative period to reduce the risk of adhesions and to promote ostiomeatal patency. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of a long-term nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline (3.0%) versus isotonic saline (0.9%) in the normal and postoperative group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the transit time of nasal mucociliary clearance with a saccharine test. In the normal control group I (n = 20), the mean transit times (MTTs) were measured before and after the irrigation with atomized saline of 0.9%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5% concentrations. In the normal control group Il (n=19), MTTs were measured before and after the atomized 0.9%, 3% saline irrigation for two months. In the postoperative group (n=10), MTTs were measured after the irrigation with saline of 0.9% (right nasal cavity) & 3% (left nasal cavity) for one month. The symptom scores about nasal stuffiness, rhinorrhea and the amount of nasal lavage contents were recorded daily. RESULTS: In the normal control group I, MTT of 3% saline irrigation was significantly shortened than those of isotonic and other hypertonic saline irrigation. In the normal control group II, MTT of 3% saline irrigation was gradually and significantly shortened compared with those of isotonic saline for two months. In the postoperative group, 3% saline irrigation had a significantly shorter MTT for one month and had a significantly more nasal lavage contents during 1st week than isotonic saline irrigation. CONCLUSION: A 3% hypertonic saline would be useful as a long-term nasal washing solution in both surgical and non-surgical patients with a history of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Humans ; Mucociliary Clearance* ; Nasal Lavage ; Nasal Lavage Fluid ; Postoperative Period ; Saccharin

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chitin is a recognition element for tissue infiltration by innate cells implicated in allergy and asthma. Chitinases are characterized by the ability to cleave chitin. YKL-40, the chitinase-like protein, was increased during Th2-type inflammation in an exaggerated manner in tissues of patients with asthma. However, the relationship of YKL-40 level to allergic rhinitis has not been evaluated. Hence, we evaluated the relationship between the YKL-40 level in the blood and nasal lavage fluid and allergic inflammation in nasal cavity. We also evaluated the nature of association between several important factors (eosinophil count and total IgE) in the blood and nasal lavage fluid of allergic rhinitis patients. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The concentrations of the YKL-40 levels in the blood and nasal lavage fluid were compared between allergic rhinitis patients and healthy controls. We evaluated the YKL-40 levels in the blood and nasal lavage fluid and also evaluated symptom severity, eosinophil count, and total IgE. RESULTS: The blood YKL-40 level was not significantly increased in allergic rhinitis (49 pg/mL) than in control (44 pg/mL)(p>0.05). The YKL-40 levels in the nasal lavage fluid was not significantly increased in allergic rhinitis (1568 pg/mL) than in control (1248 pg/mL)(p>0.05). The YKL-40 levels in blood and nasal lavage fluid were not associated with important factors such as symptom severity, eosinophil count, and total IgE in allergic rhinitis patients. CONCLUSION: There is no association between the YKL-40 level in the blood and nasal lavage fluid, allergic inflammation in nasal cavity.
Asthma ; Chitin ; Chitinase ; Eosinophils ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Immunoglobulin E ; Inflammation ; Nasal Cavity ; Nasal Lavage ; Nasal Lavage Fluid ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

PURPOSE: The efficacy of antibiotic therapy for acute sinusitis is controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of amoxicillin with nasal irrigation and nasal irrigation alone for acute sinusitis in children. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, controlled study included 80 children aged 4-15 years with a clinical presentation of acute sinusitis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either amoxicillin (80 mg/kg/day) in 3 divided doses orally for 14 days with saline nasal irrigation (for 5 days) and 0.25% phenylephrine (for 2 days) or the same treatment without amoxicillin. Clinical improvements in their initial symptoms were assessed on days 3, 14, 21, and 28. RESULTS: On day 3, patients in the amoxicillin with nasal irrigation group showed significant clinical improvement (P=0.001), but there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement between the amoxicillin with nasal irrigation and nasal irrigation alone groups during follow-up (P>0.05). In addition, no significant differences were seen in age, sex, and degree of improvement between groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: High-dose amoxicillin with saline nasal irrigation relieved acute sinusitis symptoms faster and more often than saline nasal irrigation alone. However, antibiotic treatment for acute sinusitis confers only a small therapeutic benefit over nasal irrigation.
Amoxicillin* ; Child* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Nasal Lavage* ; Phenylephrine ; Sinusitis*

Chronic Disease ; Humans ; Nasal Lavage ; Sinusitis ; drug therapy ; therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although different methods of collecting nasal fluid exist and can influence the result of the study, there have not been any studies made yet to compare the different methods. The authors aimed to evaluate the usefulness of these methods by comparing the albumin concentration of nasal fluid after nasal provocation in patients with allergic rhinitis. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: In 22 patients with allergic rhinitis, we measured the change of nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea after nasal provocation using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In Group A (n=10), the nasal lavage and direct suction method were used and in Group B (n=12), nasal lavage and filter paper method were used. Nasal fluids were obtained before, 20 min after and 8 hours after provocation. The concentration of albumin was calculated using rate nephelometry. RESULTS: Patients' nasal symptoms were aggravated in early allergic reaction but subsided in late reaction. There was meaningful increase of albumin concentration with the use of direct suction and filter paper methods. In contrast, there was no significant increase of concentration with the use of lavage method. CONCLUSION: The filter paper method is superior in the quantitative analysis of mediators in nasal fluid after nasal provocation in allergic patients. The lavage method, however, is considered inappropriate because of its dilution effect.
Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Nasal Lavage ; Nasal Lavage Fluid ; Nasal Obstruction ; Nasal Provocation Tests ; Nephelometry and Turbidimetry ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial ; Suction ; Therapeutic Irrigation

OBJECTIVES: Budesonide nasal irrigation was introduced recently for postoperative management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. The safety and therapeutic effectiveness of this procedure is becoming accepted by many physicians. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative steroid irrigation in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma. METHODS: This prospective study involved 12 chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyps and asthma who received oral steroid treatment for recurring or worsening disease. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) and Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores were checked before nasal budesonide irrigation, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 months after irrigation. We also calculated the total amount of oral steroids and inhaled steroids in the 6 months before irrigation and the 6 months after it. RESULTS: The mean SNOT-22 score improved from 30.8±14.4 before irrigation to 14.2±8.7 after 6 months of irrigation (P=0.030). The endoscopy score also improved from 7.4±4.7 before irrigation to 2.2±2.7 after 6 months (P<0.001). The total amount of oral steroid was decreased from 397.8±97.6 mg over the 6 months before irrigation to 72.7±99.7 mg over the 6 months after irrigation (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Nasal irrigation with budesonide is an effective postoperative treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with asthma, which recurs frequently, reducing the oral steroid intake.
Asthma* ; Budesonide* ; Endoscopy ; Humans ; Nasal Lavage* ; Nasal Polyps ; Prospective Studies ; Sinusitis ; Steroids

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A recently proposed apparatus for the treatment of nasal inflammatory affections is the atomized nasal douche. The aim of the paper was to assess the efficacy of the atomized nasal douche in patients affected by acute or chronic rhinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 60 adult patients: They were subdivided into two groups and each group consisted of 15 patients suffering from vasomotor rhinitis and 15 patients affected by acute rhinitis. The former underwent atomized nasal douche and the latter underwent nasal lavages with saline solution. We performed bacterial cultures of the nasal swab and the secretions drawn from the nasal cavity, a rhinomanometric test, an assessment of the symptomatologic score before and after the treatment in all the patients. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, there was a reduction or complete disappearance of the bacterial colonies in 23 of the 30 patients treated with the atomized nasal douche, while in the control group the same result occurred in only 10 of the 30 patients. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that the atomized nasal douche performs an efficacious lavage of the nasal cavity, representing a good support for the treatment of inflammatory processes of the nose.
Adult ; Humans ; Nasal Cavity ; Nasal Lavage ; Nose ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis, Vasomotor ; Sodium Chloride ; Therapeutic Irrigation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A recently proposed apparatus for the treatment of nasal inflammatory affections is the atomized nasal douche. The aim of the paper was to assess the efficacy of the atomized nasal douche in patients affected by acute or chronic rhinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 60 adult patients: They were subdivided into two groups and each group consisted of 15 patients suffering from vasomotor rhinitis and 15 patients affected by acute rhinitis. The former underwent atomized nasal douche and the latter underwent nasal lavages with saline solution. We performed bacterial cultures of the nasal swab and the secretions drawn from the nasal cavity, a rhinomanometric test, an assessment of the symptomatologic score before and after the treatment in all the patients. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, there was a reduction or complete disappearance of the bacterial colonies in 23 of the 30 patients treated with the atomized nasal douche, while in the control group the same result occurred in only 10 of the 30 patients. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that the atomized nasal douche performs an efficacious lavage of the nasal cavity, representing a good support for the treatment of inflammatory processes of the nose.
Adult ; Humans ; Nasal Cavity ; Nasal Lavage ; Nose ; Rhinitis ; Rhinitis, Vasomotor ; Sodium Chloride ; Therapeutic Irrigation

The surgical methods for the obstruction of nasolacrimal duct include conventional dacryocystorhinostomy and nasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.The authors followed 52 eyes of 54 patients who had undergone conventional or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy to compare the surgical success rate, between the group whose nasolacrimal duct was washed with normal saline and the control group without irrigation. Nasal cavity of all patients were examined for the abnormalities such asnasal septal deviation, hypertropy of middle concha, ethmoid sinusitis and nasal polyp.The patients with those abnormalities were excluded. There was significant difference between the two groups, showing better outcome in the group with nasal irrigation. These results suggest that washing NLD after the dacryocystorhinostomy may be effective as an additional therapy to enhance the success rate of operation.
Dacryocystorhinostomy* ; Ethmoid Sinus ; Ethmoid Sinusitis ; Humans ; Nasal Cavity ; Nasal Lavage ; Nasolacrimal Duct*