BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the treatment of open nasal bone fracture (ONF). The operative technique, timing, and management of ONF is still confusing. This study presents our treatment policy of ONF to help otolaryngologists decide proper management plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 380 consecutive patients who required surgical intervention, 57 patients underwent open nasal reduction. Of 57 patients, 15 had one-stage operation, and 42 had two- stage operation. Postoperative patients' satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the reasons of dissatisfaction were analyzed. RESULTS: ONF had poorer outcome than closed nasal bone fracture. Unsatisfactory cosmetic results such as scan of the external nose and change of the skin color were the most common problems associated with open nasal reduction. CONCLUSION: Operation timing and technique should be selectively applied to different types of nasal bone fracture and wound state. Meticulous wound care as well as accurate nasal bone reduction is mandatory for ONF.
Humans ; Nasal Bone* ; Nose ; Skin ; Wounds and Injuries

Ethmoid Bone ; injuries ; Facial Bones ; injuries ; Humans ; Nasal Bone ; injuries ; Orbital Fractures ; surgery ; Osteogenesis, Distraction ; Skull Fractures ; surgery

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antibiotic administration after surgery for a nasal bone fracture is performed due to concerns about infection-related complications, such as, toxic shock syndrome. To evaluate the validity and efficacy of antibiotic use, we compared the results obtained and the bacterial profiles of nasal packing materials in patients that underwent closed reduction for a nasal bone fracture with or without prophylactic antibiotic administration. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with a nasal bone fracture, but without an open wound, that underwent closed reduction during March to August 2017 were included in the present study. Fifteen of these 30 patients were randomly assigned to a control group, members of were administered postoperative intravenous antibiotics once at the day of surgery and then oral antibiotics for 4 days. The other 15 patients were assigned to an experimental group and not administered any antibiotic postoperatively. Antibiotic ointment was not applied to nasal packing in either group. Nasal packing was removed on postoperative day 4 in all cases. Removed nasal gauze packings were culture tested and strains identified in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Bacterial strain types cultured from packings were similar in the experimental and control groups and no patient showed signs of clinically significant infection. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest postoperative prophylactic antibiotic use is not clinically required after closed reduction of a nasal bone fracture. Furthermore, the non-use of postoperative antibiotics is biologically beneficial, as it reduces the occurrence of resistant strains and medical costs, and is more convenient for patients.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Fractures, Bone ; Humans ; Nasal Bone ; Prospective Studies ; Shock, Septic ; Wounds and Injuries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate diagnosis of nasal fracture is difficult in many cases. Some reports showed that threedimensional facial computed tomography (3-D facial CT) is more effective than conventional facial computed tomography (conventional CT) in the diagnosis of nasal fracture. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of 3-D facial CT in diagnosis of nasal fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1, 2006 to January 31, 2007, 85 patients (83 men and 2 women, ranging in age from 29 to 46 years) visited the Armed Forces Capital Hospital within 2 weeks from nasal trauma. All patients prospectively underwent physical examination, lateral nasal bone view, Water's view, conventional CT, and 3-D CT. If any of definite crepitus on physical examination, or if definite fracture line on simple X-ray, or on conventional CT or on 3-D CT was found according to Hwang's criteria, that patient was confirmed to have nasal bone fracture. The diagnostic values of conventional CT and 3-D CT methods were analyzed by Pearson's chi-square test. RESULTS: Out of 85 trauma patients, 71 patients were diagnosed as having nasal bone fractures with the most common causes being, in the order of frequency of oc-currence, sports injuries and with other causes of blows, military training, works, and traffic accident. 28 patients showed nasal septal displace-ment or fracture. Conventional CT and 3-D CT were equally effective and had diagnosed 70 out of 71 fractures (98.6% of positive predictive value) and determined to be more effective than simple X-ray which had diagnosed only 50 fractures (70.4% of positive predictive value)(p=0.000). In the evaluation of nasal septum, conventional CT was proved to be more effective than 3-D CT since it diagnosed all 28 nasal deviation or fractures cases (100%) whereas 3-D CT diagonosed only 23 cases out of 28 (82.1%)(p=0.000). CONCLUSION: 3-D CT is not more effective than conventional CT in the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. Moreover, conventional CT is better than 3-D CT in the diagnosis of nasal septal displacement or septal fracture.
Accidents, Traffic ; Arm ; Athletic Injuries ; Displacement (Psychology) ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Military Personnel ; Nasal Bone ; Nasal Septum ; Physical Examination ; Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVES: Submental intubation has been advocated as an alternative to classical tracheostomy for certain indicated panfacial trauma surgeries. Surgeons should have various options for airway management in maxillofacial trauma patients. Most maxillofacial injuries involve occlusal derangements, which might require intraoperative occlusal corrections; hence, orotracheal intubation is not ideal. Maxillofacial surgeons generally prefer nasotracheal intubation; however, in cases with concomitant skull base fracture or nasal bone fracture, nasotracheal intubation might not be suitable; in these situations, tracheostomy is typically performed. However, the possible complications of tracheostomy are well known. Due to trauma situations and to avoid the complications of tracheostomy, submental intubation would be an ideal alternative procedure in selected maxillofacial trauma surgery patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and usefulness of a submental intubation technique for panfacial trauma surgery. Moreover, we intended to share our experience of submental intubation and to recommend this simple, safe procedure for certain panfacial trauma surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five panfacial trauma patients, we performed submental intubation for airway management; the mean time required for the procedure was only eight minutes. RESULTS: We were able to execute this procedure safely in a short time without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Submental intubation is a safe and simple technique for airway management in indicated panfacial trauma surgery patients.
Airway Management ; Humans ; Intubation* ; Maxillofacial Injuries ; Nasal Bone ; Postoperative Complications ; Skull Base ; Tracheostomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It has generally been accepted that closed reduction is the management of nasal fracture in children. But proper management is still confusing and clinical and radiological evaluation about long term results have yet to be determined. The purpose of this study is to determine which closed reduction method for nasal bone fractures in children is effective when considering clinical and radiological aspects. MATERIALS AND METHOD: We analysed the medical records of 35 children with nasal bone fractures up to the age of 15, who were operated by closed reduction between 2000 and 2002. We evaluated postoperative satisfaction of doctors and patients and postoperative CT scan score (Motomura et al 2001) of 14 children over more than at least 2 postoperative years. RESULTS: A peak incidence ages ranged from 13 to 15 years. The most frequent cause was sports injuries. The degree of postoperative satisfaction and postoperative CT scan score was favorable. CONCLUSION: In management of nasal fracture in children, closed reduction is effective and satisfactory when clinical and radiological aspects are considered.
Athletic Injuries ; Child* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Medical Records ; Nasal Bone* ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In modern society, maxillofacial trauma is correlated with an increase in population and traffic accident due to industrialization and urbanization. Many studies have examined maxillofacial trauma, although these studies have shown various results due to investigator's viewpoint and regional and cultural differences. Hence, we conducted this study to examine the current status of patients with maxillofacial trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Based on patients' clinical data, we retrospectively reviewed clinical characteristics, demographic information and radiographic findings of 527 patients (633 cases based on the fracture sites) with maxillofacial trauma who had visited our hospital between January 1998 and December 2002. We analyzed patients' sex, cause of trauma, and fracture sites. Furthermore, we analyzed the type of treatment for each fracture site. RESULTS: Patients with maxillofacial fracture showed a male predominance of 2.9: 1, and were prevalent in the 20's, 10's and 30's in the order of frequency. These patients showed an increasing tendency in their numbers on a yearly basis, and were the most prevalent in 2002 and on November according to year and month, respectively. The most common etiology was `violence (36.6%)'. Predilection sites were `nasal bone (52.1%)' and `orbit (21.5% [blowout fracture of the orbital wall])'. CONCLUSION: Patients with maxillofacial trauma showed an increasing tendency in their numbers on a yearly basis and frequently exhibited nasal bone fracture and blowout fracture of the medial orbital wall. Accordingly, these patients frequently consult otolaryngologits in comparison with the past. otolaryngologists will pay more attention to these patients.
Accidents, Traffic ; Facial Bones ; Humans ; Male ; Maxillofacial Injuries ; Nasal Bone ; Orbit ; Retrospective Studies* ; Urbanization ; Industrial Development

PURPOSE: To research about maxillofacial traumatic injuries of children in aspects of gender difference, various incidence rates between age, trauma type, cause, monthly and daily incidence rate, type of tooth damage, gingival damage, soft tissue damage, and type of facial bone fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study group consisted of children under 15 years of age who visited Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University from 2004/7/1 to 2007/6/30 with chief complaint of oral and maxillofacial traumatic injuries. 1,559 cases of traumatic injuries were studied from 1,556 (1,004 male, 552 female) children. CONCLUSION: 1. There were slightly more boys than girls, giving a male-to-female ratio of 1.82:1.0. The 1-3 year old boys and girls had the highest number of traumatic injuries. 2. Of the 1,556 patients, 68.63% had soft tissue injuries, 50.22% had periodontal injuries, 29.89% had teeth injuries, and 3.85% had maxillofacial bone fractures. 3. Falling down was the most common cause of injury in both sexes. 4. The months with the highest incidence rates were in order May (12.12%), June (11.74%), and October (11.13%). Most of the injuries occurred on weekends. 5. The most common tooth injury was uncomplicated crown fracture, and the most common periodontal injury was subluxation. The majority of traumatizes teeth were the upper central incisors. 6. The most common soft tissue injury was intraoral lacerations. 7. Mandibular fractures were most frequent in facial bone fractures; symphysis, condylar head, and angle fractures were most frequent in mandibular fractures; maxillary and nasal bone fractures were most frequent in midfacial bone fractures.
Child ; Crowns ; Dentistry ; Facial Bones ; Fractures, Bone ; Head ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Mandibular Fractures ; Maxillofacial Injuries ; Nasal Bone ; Soft Tissue Injuries ; Tooth ; Tooth Injuries

Ethmoid Bone ; surgery ; Facial Bones ; injuries ; Humans ; Maxillofacial Injuries ; classification ; surgery ; Nasal Bone ; injuries ; Oral Surgical Procedures ; Orbital Fractures ; surgery ; Skull Fractures ; surgery

Trauma in the elderly, such as facial bone fractures, has been increasing, but there is paucity of literature examining the facial bone fractures of the elderly. Therefore, this study contributes to the prevention of facial bone fractures in the elderly and presents support from the literature for establishing a support policy for the elderly. Retrospective analyses were conducted on clinical records from January 2006 through December 2010 for facial bone fractures in 474 cases; of those cases, 300 patients were 55 years old or above. The statistical analyses were conducted according to the sex, age group, occupation, area of residence, time of accident, cause of accident, site, and multiplicity of the fractures, associated injuries, combined soft tissue injuries, treatment methods, and sequelae. Two hundred twenty-five (75.0%) were male and seventy-five (25.0%) were female patients. Among the age groups, patients in the age range of 65 to 74 years old were the most common. There were 136 (45.3%) patients who were farmers and agricultural support personnel. Patients in urban areas were more commocn than those from rural areas. The number of the patients increased each year except in 2008. The most common cause of fractures was traffic accidents, followed by slip down. Zygomatic fractures were the highest among all fracture types, followed by nasal bone fractures. There were more cases undergoing conservative treatment compared to those in a study of all age groups. Gathering information on facial bone fractures in the elderly will be valuable in establishing preventive strategies and policies.
Accidents, Traffic ; Aged ; Facial Bones ; Female ; Fractures, Bone ; Humans ; Male ; Nasal Bone ; Occupations ; Retrospective Studies ; Soft Tissue Injuries ; Zygomatic Fractures