Spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-induced analgesia was characterized, and its underlying mechanisms were examined in a spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain in rats. The analgesic effect of SCS with moderate mechanical hypersensitivity was increased with increasing stimulation intensity between the 20% and 80% motor thresholds. Various frequencies (2, 15, 50, 100, 10000 Hz, and 2/100 Hz dense-dispersed) of SCS were similarly effective. SCS-induced analgesia was maintained without tolerance within 24 h of continuous stimulation. SCS at 2 Hz significantly increased methionine enkephalin content in the cerebrospinal fluid. The analgesic effect of 2 Hz was abolished by μ or κ opioid receptor antagonist. The effect of 100 Hz was prevented by a κ antagonist, and that of 10 kHz was blocked by any of the μ, δ, or κ receptor antagonists, suggesting that the analgesic effect of SCS at different frequencies is mediated by different endorphins and opioid receptors.
Analgesics ; Animals ; Narcotic Antagonists/pharmacology* ; Neuralgia/therapy* ; Opioid Peptides ; Rats ; Receptors, Opioid/physiology* ; Receptors, Opioid, kappa ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Stimulation

Naltrexone is a competitive antagonist of μ, δ, and κ opioid receptors. Naltrexone has been investigated for use an as anti-obesity agent in both the general population and in patients with severe mental illness, including schizophrenia. In patients with schizophrenia, however, potential psychotic symptoms due to adverse effects of naltrexone have not been investigated. Our case study, a relevant case report, and some related articles suggest that naltrexone might be associated with the emergence of visual hallucinations, which clinicians should be aware of.
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Hallucinations ; Humans ; Naltrexone ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Receptors, Opioid ; Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: The use of aroma oils dates back to at least 3000 B.C., where it was applied to mummify corpses and treat the wounds of soldiers. Since the 1920s, the term “aromatherapy” has been used for fragrance therapy with essential oils. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the essential oil of Eucalyptus (EOE) affects pain pathways in various pain conditions and motor coordination. METHODS: Mice were subjected to inhalation or intraperitoneal injection of EOE, and its analgesic effects were assessed by conducting formalin, thermal plantar, and acetic acid tests; the effects of EOE on motor coordination were evaluated using a rotarod test. To determine the analgesic mechanism, 5′-guanidinonaltrindole (κ-opioid antagonist, 0.3 mg/kg), naltrindole (δ-opioid antagonist, 5 mg/kg), glibenclamide (δ-opioid antagonist, 2 mg/kg), and naloxone (μ-opioid antagonist, 4, 8, 12 mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally. RESULTS: EOE showed an analgesic effect against visceral pain caused by acetic acid (EOE, 45 mg/kg); however, no analgesic effect was observed against thermal nociceptive pain. Moreover, it was demonstrated that EOE did not have an effect on motor coordination. In addition, an anti-inflammatory effect was observed during the formalin test. CONCLUSIONS: EOE, which is associated with the μ-opioid pain pathway, showed potential effects against somatic, inflammatory, and visceral pain and could be a potential therapeutic agent for pain.
Acetic Acid ; Analgesics ; Animals ; Aromatherapy ; Cadaver ; Eucalyptus ; Formaldehyde ; Glyburide ; Humans ; Inhalation ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; Mice ; Military Personnel ; Naloxone ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Nociceptive Pain ; Oils ; Oils, Volatile ; Pain Measurement ; Rotarod Performance Test ; Visceral Pain ; Wounds and Injuries

Pain therapy often entails gastrointestinal adverse events. While opioids are effective drugs for pain relief, the incidence of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) varies greatly from 15% to as high as 81%. This can lead to a significant impairment in quality of life, often resulting in discontinuation of opioid therapy. In this regard, a good doctor-patient relationship is especially pivotal when initiating opioid therapy. In addition to a detailed history of bowel habits, patient education regarding the possible gastrointestinal side effects of the drugs is crucial. In addition, the bowel function must be regularly evaluated for the entire duration of treatment with opioids. Furthermore, if the patient has preexisting constipation that is well under control, continuation of that treatment is important. In the absence of such history, general recommendations should include sufficient fluid intake, physical activity, and regular intake of dietary fiber. In patients of OIC with ongoing opioid therapy, the necessity of opioid use should be critically reevaluated in terms of an with acceptable quality of life, particularly in cases of non-cancer pain. If opioids must be continued, lowering the dose may help, as well as changing the type of opioid. If these measures do not suffice, the next step for persistent OIC is the administration of laxatives. If these are ineffective as well, treatment with peripherally active μ-opioid receptor antagonists should be considered. Enemas and irrigation are emergency measures, often used as a last resort.
Analgesics, Opioid ; Constipation ; Dietary Fiber ; Emergencies ; Enema ; Health Resorts ; Humans ; Incidence ; Laxatives ; Motor Activity ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Pain Management ; Patient Education as Topic ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Quality of Life

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Opioids cause gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility, decrease gut secretion, and affect gut sphincters. Symptoms of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction may be alleviated by peripherally acting opioid antagonists like naloxegol, but detailed knowledge on GI effects of this drug is lacking. We hypothesized that naloxegol, compared to placebo, would reduce GI transit time and colonic fecal volume in opioid-treated healthy participants. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, single-center, 2-way cross-over study in 24 healthy males, randomized to a 6 day treatment period of oxycodone (15 mg twice a day) co-administered with either naloxegol (25 mg once a day) or matching placebo. Participants swallowed an electromagnetic capsule which determined GI transit times. Colonic fecal volume was quantified with magnetic resonance imaging both pre-treatment and post-treatment. RESULTS: Naloxegol reduced total GI transit time by 21% (56 hours vs 71 hours, P = 0.02) and colonic transit time by 23% (45 hours vs 59 hours, P < 0.01), compared to placebo. However, no difference in colonic fecal volume was found (818 mL vs 884 mL, P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration of naloxegol in healthy participants reverses the retardation of total GI and colonic transit induced by oxycodone. This supports the use of naloxegol in the treatment of GI side effects to opioid treatment, and add knowledge to the current understanding of mechanisms behind peripherally-acting opioid antagonists.
Analgesics, Opioid ; Colon ; Constipation ; Cross-Over Studies ; Gastrointestinal Transit ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnets ; Male ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Oxycodone

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) side effect to opioid treatment. Opioid receptor antagonists against OIC have been introduced, but their efficacy has not been directly compared to conventional laxatives. Our aim was to compare symptoms and objective parameters of gut function in an experimental model of OIC during treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone and oxycodone in prolonged-release (PR) formulation versus oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial 20 healthy men received a 5-day treatment of combined PR oxycodone/naloxone or PR oxycodone plus macrogol 3350. Regional GI transit times and segmental colorectal transit were assessed with the Motilis 3D-Transit electromagnetic capsule system. Colorectal volumes were determined by MRI. OIC symptoms were assessed with validated questionnaires, along with stool frequency and consistency. RESULTS: Total colorectal volume did not change after 5 days’ treatment with PR oxycodone/naloxone (941 vs 1036 mL; P = 0.091), but increased significantly after PR oxycodone plus macrogol treatment (912 vs 1123 mL; P < 0.001). Neither regional GI transit times nor segmental colorectal transit differed between the treatments (all P > 0.05). The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom Questionnaire abdominal symptoms score was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (0.2 vs 3.2; P = 0.002). Stool frequency was lower during PR oxycodone/naloxone compared to PR oxycodone plus macrogol (4.2 vs 5.4; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: PR oxycodone plus macrogol increases colorectal volume, but does not improve GI transit compared to PR oxycodone/naloxone. However, PR oxycodone/naloxone results in a lower abdominal symptom burden, despite higher stool frequency during macrogol treatment.
Analgesics, Opioid ; Constipation ; Humans ; Laxatives ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Magnets ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Naloxone ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Oxycodone ; Polyethylene Glycols

BACKGROUND: Curcumin is traditionally used as an herbal medicine. We explored the efficacy of intrathecal curcumin in relieving both postoperative and inflammatory pain and elucidated the mechanisms of action of curcumin interacting with γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and opioid receptors at the spinal level. METHODS: Experimental pain was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats via paw incision or injection of intraplantar carrageenan. After examination of the effects of intrathecal curcumin on the pain, GABA and opioid receptor antagonists were intrathecally administered to explore the involvement of GABA or opioid receptors on the effect of curcumin. Additionally, the expression levels of the GABA and opioid receptors were assessed. RESULTS: Intrathecal curcumin reduced the withdrawal threshold of both incisional surgery- and carrageenan injection-induced nociception. Intrathecal GABA and opioid receptor antagonists reversed the curcumin-mediated antinociception. Incisional surgery decreased the levels of the GABA receptors mRNA, but little changed the levels of the opioid receptors mRNA. Carrageenan injection increased the levels of the opioid receptors mRNA, but not the GABA receptors mRNA levels. Intrathecal curcumin increased or decreased the levels of GABA receptors mRNA and opioid receptors mRNA in the spinal cords of incised or carrageenan-injected rats, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal curcumin was effective to postoperative and inflammatory pain and such antinociception of curcumin was antagonized by both GABA and opioid receptor antagonists. Also, intrathecal curcumin altered the levels of GABA and opioid receptors. Thus, spinal GABA and opioid receptors may, respectively, be directly or indirectly involved when curcumin alleviates postoperative and inflammatory pain.
Animals ; Carrageenan ; Curcumin ; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid ; Herbal Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Narcotic Antagonists ; Nociception ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, GABA ; Receptors, Opioid ; RNA, Messenger ; Spinal Cord

Cognition and pain share common neural substrates and interact reciprocally: chronic pain compromises cognitive performance, whereas cognitive processes modulate pain perception. In the present study, we established a non-drug-dependent rat model of context-based analgesia, where two different contexts (dark and bright) were matched with a high (52°C) or low (48°C) temperature in the hot-plate test during training. Before and after training, we set the temperature to the high level in both contexts. Rats showed longer paw licking latencies in trials with the context originally matched to a low temperature than those to a high temperature, indicating successful establishment of a context-based analgesic effect in rats. This effect was blocked by intraperitoneal injection of naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) before the probe. The context-based analgesic effect also disappeared after optogenetic activation or inhibition of the bilateral infralimbic or prelimbic sub-region of the prefrontal cortex. In brief, we established a context-based, non-drug dependent, placebo-like analgesia model in the rat. This model provides a new and useful tool for investigating the cognitive modulation of pain.
Action Potentials ; drug effects ; physiology ; Analgesics ; pharmacology ; therapeutic use ; Animals ; Disease Models, Animal ; Electric Stimulation ; Female ; In Vitro Techniques ; Naloxone ; pharmacology ; Narcotic Antagonists ; pharmacology ; Optogenetics ; Pain ; drug therapy ; pathology ; physiopathology ; Pain Measurement ; drug effects ; Pain Threshold ; drug effects ; physiology ; Patch-Clamp Techniques ; Physical Stimulation ; Prefrontal Cortex ; drug effects ; metabolism ; pathology ; Pyramidal Cells ; drug effects ; physiology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Time Factors

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of µ-opioid receptors (µ-ORs) in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) on feeding and drinking behaviors in rats and evaluate the role of glutamate signaling in opioid-mediated ingestive behaviors.

METHODSStainless steel cannulas were implanted in the unilateral CeA for microinjection of different doses of the selective µ-OR agonist DAMGO in satiated or water-deprived male SD rats. The subsequent food intake or water intake of the rats was measured at 60, 120, and 240 min after the injection. The rats receiving microinjections of naloxone (NTX, a nonselective opioid antagonist) or D-AP-5 (a selective N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-type glutamate receptor antagonist) prior to DAMGO microinjection were tested for food intake at 60, 120, and 240 min after the injections.

RESULTSInjections of DAMGO (1-4 nmol in 0.5 µl) into the CeA significantly increased food intake in satiated rats, but did not affect water intake in rats with water deprivation. NTX (26.5 nmol in 0.5 µl) injected into the CeA antagonized DAMGO-induced feeding but D-AP-5 (6.3-25.4 nmol in 0.5 µl) injections did not produce such an effect.

CONCLUSIONµ-ORs in the CeA regulate food intake rather than water intake in rats, and the orexigenic role of µ-ORs is not dependent on the activation of the NMDA receptors in the CeA.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Central Amygdaloid Nucleus ; physiology ; Drinking ; physiology ; Eating ; physiology ; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)- ; pharmacology ; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists ; pharmacology ; Male ; Naloxone ; pharmacology ; Narcotic Antagonists ; pharmacology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Receptors, Opioid, mu ; physiology

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in subjective acute effects of alcohol and naltrexone among those who prefer spicy food to varying degrees. Acute biphasic alcohol effects scale (BAES), visual analogue scale for craving (VAS-C), blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and food preference scale were measured in 26 men. Repeated measures ANOVA (2 preference groupsx4 time blocks) on the stimulative subscale of BAES revealed a significant group by block interaction in naltrexone condition (N+) (P<0.001), but not in non-naltrexone condition (N-). Furthermore, repeated measures ANOVA (2 drug groupsx4 time blocks) on the stimulative subscale of BAES revealed a significant group by block interaction in strong preference for spicy food (SP) (P<0.001), but not in lesser preference for spicy food (LP). The paired t-test revealed that significant suppression of the stimulative subscale of BAES was observed at 15 min (P<0.001) and 30 min (P<0.001) after drinking when N+ compared with N- in SP. For those who prefer spicy food, the stimulative effect of acute alcohol administration was suppressed by naltrexone. This result suggests that the effect of naltrexone may vary according to spicy food preference.
Adult ; Alcohol Drinking/*adverse effects ; Alcoholism/*drug therapy ; Capsaicin/pharmacology ; Food Preferences/*drug effects ; Humans ; Male ; Naltrexone/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Narcotic Antagonists/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Questionnaires ; Sensory System Agents/pharmacology ; Young Adult