A 59-year-old man who had been treated medically for aortic stenosis and angina pectoris was hospitalized due to a high fever. He was treated immediately by intravenous infusion of antibiotics. Blood culture was positive for α-streptococcus. Echocardiography revealed severe aortic stenosis with vegetation on the aortic valve and minimal aortic regurgitation. The peak aortic pressure gradient was 80mmHg. The patient developed chest pain at rest and showed ischemic ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram obtained after admission. Coronary angiography (CAG) was performed to assess the extent of coronary artery disease, and it showed 90% stenosis of the right coronary artery (RCA) and 75% stenosis of the circumflex branch (Cx). Both fever and angina pectoris were so resistant to maximal medical treatment that the patient was referred to our hospital for urgent surgical treatment. During surgery, a large vegetation was noted on the aortic valve, which was calcified, and a destructive ring abscess was observed around the coronary cusp. Aortic valve replacement (SJM-19mm) was performed after complete debridement of the abscess and repair of the resulting aortoventricular discontinuity. Double coronary bypass saphenous vein grafting to RCA and Cx was performed. The patient recovered without incident and was discharged 4 weeks after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcomes, including distant relapse, after en bloc spondylectomy (EBS) for spinal metastases in patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although EBS has been reported to be locally curative and extend survival in select patients with spinal metastases, detailed reports regarding the control of distant relapse after EBS are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients (median age at EBS, 62 years; range, 40–77 years) who underwent EBS for spinal metastases between 1991 and 2015. The primary cancer sites included the kidney (n=7), thyroid (n=4), liver (n=3), and other locations (n=4). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank method. RESULTS: The median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 767.5 minutes and 2,375 g, respectively. Twelve patients (66.7%) experienced perioperative complications. Five patients (27.8%) experienced local recurrence of the tumor at a median of 12.5 months after EBS, four of which had a positive resection margin status. Thirteen patients (72.2%) experienced distant relapse at a median of 21 months after EBS. The estimated median survival period after distant relapse was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 0.71–39.29 months). No association was found between resection margin status and distant relapse. Overall, the 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates after EBS were 72.2%, 48.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. Importantly, the era in which EBS was performed did not impact the oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that EBS by itself, even if margin-free, cannot prevent further dissemination, which occurred in >70% of patients at a median of 21 months after EBS. These results should be considered and conveyed to patients for clinical decision-making.
Clinical Decision-Making ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney ; Liver ; Methods ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Operative Time ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Spine ; Survival Rate ; Thyroid Gland

Purpose: General surgeons at regional hospitals should have the primary trauma care skills necessary to treat critically ill trauma patients to withstand transfer. This study was conducted to identify a consensus on primary trauma care skills for general surgeons. Methods: An initial list of acute care surgical skills was compiled, and revised by six trauma experts (acute care surgeons); 33 skills were nominated for inclusion in the Delphi consensus survey. Participants (councilors of the Japanese Society for Acute Care Surgery) were presented with the list of 33 trauma care skills and were asked (using web-based software) to rate how strongly they agreed or disagreed (using a 5-point Likert scale) with the necessity of each skill for a general surgeon. The reliability of consensus was predefined as Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.8, and trauma care skills were considered as primarily required when rated 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) by ≥ 80% participants. Results: There were 117 trauma care specialists contacted to participate in the Delphi consensus survey panel. In the 1st round, 85 specialists participated (response rate: 72.6%). In the 2nd round, 66 specialists participated (response rate: 77.6%). Consensus was achieved after two rounds, reliability using Cronbach’s α was 0.94, and 34 items were identified as primary trauma care skills needed by general surgeons. Conclusion A consensus-based list of trauma care skills required by general surgeons was developed. This list can facilitate the development of a new trauma training course which has been optimized for general surgeons.