Objective: To clarify the barriers pharmacists face in handling patients with adverse drug events at community pharmacies and to propose solutions.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Methods: One hundred-twenty-one pharmacists, who worked and experienced to work at community pharmacies (76.0%), hospitals (22.3%), or elsewhere, participated in this study.  All of them were divided into 12 groups and asked to note the barriers, and abstract and structure them through discussion in each group according to the KJ-method.  On the other hand, workers at community pharmacies including people with experience were also asked to fill out a prepared questionnaire on barriers.
Results: Six groups structured the barriers from the perspective of professional flow as pharmacists and the other groups structured them from the perspective of a medical care team.  The barriers emerging from both structures were (a) difficulty in identifying adverse drug reaction and assessing its grade at community pharmacies, (b) lack of standardized protocols for informing physicians from community pharmacies, (c) not being informed about a physician’s assessment of suspicious adverse drug reactions, and (d) difficulty in explaining adverse events to patients and their families.  Those barriers were reported by a high percentage of respondents to the questionnaire.
Conclusion: The barriers are all crucial in order to avoid health damage caused by medication at community pharmacies and should be urgently solved.

Recently, with the increase of laparoscopic surgery, there has also been an increase in the number of surgeries that require the head-down position for a long duration and left-right rotation. We have encountered 3 cases of brachial plexus neuropathy that was thought to be caused by such surgical positions in our institute. Currently, we have improved the fixation method and fixtures and created a neuropathy checklist, and we are conducting standardized observation and decompression programs within the team. We examined whether our current programs are effective using a body pressure measuring device for 20 patients undergoing headdown lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia. The correlation between the mean body pressure on the right shoulder after 30 min and body tilt angle was studied. We also observed changes in body pressure before and after manual decompression every 30 min while the patient was in the head-down position. Before that study, we conducted an experience questionnaire survey of 10 operating room nurses. The results indicated that there was no increase in body pressure in proportion to the body tilt angle (15-20 deg). The body pressure after decompression decreased significantly at 30, 60, and 120 min after placing the patient in the head-down lithotripsy position. There was no significant correlation between body pressure and the headdown positioning time. There was a significant correlation between body mass index (BMI) and body pressure at 30 min (r=0.474, p=0.035). Complaints of trunk displacement, shoulder pain and pressure, and head and neck traction were often noted in the nurse questionnaire. These complaints were more frequently seen in cases with a larger right-down rotation angle and higher BMI. From these results, it was concluded that decompression of the body with the current fixtures and our regular observation and decompression program using the neuropathy checklist is effective for preventing brachial plexus injury in patients undergoing lithotripsy laparoscopic surgery in the head-down position and with left-right rotation.