We report a case of refractory cancer pain that was successfully treated with opioid switching by adding methadone to the preceding opioid. A 38-year-old man had severe epigastric pain and back pain because of paraaortic lymph node metastasis of a gastroesophageal junctional carcinoma. His pain was treated with continuous intravenous morphine administration and the frequent use of a rescue dose. When the morphine dose was increased, respiratory depression developed; thus, his pain was considered refractory to the morphine, and methadone was added on. The pain was relieved after initiating methadone, and the frequency of the rescue dose was markedly decreased. The methadone dose was gradually increased in parallel, and the morphine dose was reduced and finally discontinued. No methadone-induced side effects were noted, and the patient was discharged with good analgesia. In our case, adding methadone without decreasing the preceding opioid dose under strict monitoring made it possible to stably switch the opioid without increasing pain.

Aims: This study aimed at investigating the status of polypharmacy and the experience and perception of bereaved family members of patients with advanced cancer regarding the burden of oral medication. Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to 303 bereaved family members of patients with advanced cancer, and 102 valid responses were analyzed (response rate, 33.7%). Results: The number of patients in the polypharmacy group (patients taking six or more tablets at a time) was 65 and that in the non-polypharmacy group (patients taking less than six tablets at a time) was 37. The percentage of bereaved family members who felt that the oral administration burden of patients was significantly higher in the polypharmacy group (43.1% vs. 10.8%, p<0.01). The results of the analysis indicated that the bereaved families wanted to reduce the number of tablets taken at a time for alleviating the burden of polypharmacy. The bereaved families of patients in the polypharmacy group were greatly concerned that the number of oral medications was too large. They also expressed the need for medical staff from whom they could seek explanation and counseling regarding the oral medication of patients. Conclusion: It is suggested that medical staff need to be fully aware of the concerns of patients’ families regarding drugs besides checking the compliance status.