We report an extremely severe case of dysphagia in an elderly patient. Tracheostomy alone was found to be the cause of severe upper esophageal opening dysfunction. An 84-year-old woman was admitted with dyspnea. During hospitalization, she had respiratory failure and underwent a tracheostomy. On day 41 in the hospital, she complained of dysphagia and was a swallowing evaluation was done at the rehabilitation department. We ruled out other etiologies of upper esophageal dysfunction through a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic evaluation. Through follow-up tests, it was found retrospectively that extreme dysphagia could have occurred through the following mechanism: the airway was not protected at the time of the tracheostomy because the movement of the epiglottis did not appear to be normal. This was due to the reduction in laryngeal function affecting the upper esophageal opening after the tracheostomy, and at the same time, the power to push the bolus was weak. After 6 months, at the third test, she had improved enough to ingest a soft diet and fluid with thickeners, so she was able to start an oral diet without decannulation. It is thus important to recognize that tracheostomy alone can cause extremely severe aspiration. If these findings are observed in patients undergoing tracheostomy, it is necessary to check the movements of the epiglottis properly and evaluate whether the condition can be improved by rehabilitation treatment.

Objective: To systematically review the efficacy of e-Health interventions on physical performance, activity and quality of life in older adults with sarcopenia or frailty. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, Web of Science, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database for experimental studies published in English from 1990 to 2021. E-Health studies investigating physical activity, physical performance, quality of life, and activity of daily living assessment in adults aged ≥65 years with sarcopenia or frailty were selected. Results: Among the 3,164 identified articles screened, a total of 4 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by participant characteristics, type of e-Health intervention, and outcome measurement. Age criteria for participant selection and sex distribution were different between studies. Each study used different criteria for frailty, and no study used sarcopenia as a selection criteria. E-Health interventions were various across studies. Two studies used frailty status as an outcome measure and showed conflicting results. Muscle strength was assessed in 2 studies, and meta-analysis showed statistically significant improvement after intervention (standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.94; p=0.80, I2=0%). Conclusion This systematic review found insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Nevertheless, the studies included in this review showed positive effects of e-Health interventions on improving muscle strength, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults with frailty.