1.A giant choledochal cyst in infancy: a case report.
Nursel YURTTUTAN ; Suleyman Cuneyt KARAKUS ; Naim KOKU ; Mustafa DEMIRCI ; Ramazan UCAK
Korean Journal of Pediatrics 2016;59(5):239-241
Choledochal cyst is a dilation that encloses the intrahepatic or both extra- and intrahepatic portions of the biliary ducts. Postnatally, ultrasonography is the initial diagnostic modality of choice, allowing for precise measurements of intra- or extrahepatic duct dilatation and identification of stones and sludge. Symptoms depend on the age at presentation. Common bile duct malformations should be considered as a differential diagnosis of a cystic mass regardless of the cyst's size or patient's age, especially in children presenting with abdominal pain, jaundice, and palpable mass. To the best of our knowledge, we report the largest choledochal cyst in infancy.
Abdominal Pain
;
Child
;
Choledochal Cyst*
;
Common Bile Duct
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Dilatation
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Jaundice
;
Sewage
;
Ultrasonography
2.Is single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery feasible in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis?.
Suleyman Cuneyt KARAKUS ; Huseyin KILINCASLAN ; Naim KOKU ; Idris ERTASKIN
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2013;85(2):80-83
PURPOSE: Since laparoscopic appendectomy was first described, various modifications, such as single port incisionless-intracorporeal conventional equipment-endoscopic surgery (SPICES), have been described for reducing pain and improving cosmetic results. In the retrocecal and retrocolic positions, attachments to the lateral peritoneum and cecum may lead to difficulties during SPICES, which is performed with only one port. Here, we present the effects of variations in the position of the vermiform appendix in treating acute appendicitis with SPICES. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 52 children who underwent SPICES for acute appendicitis between March 2010 and November 2011 in our institution. One group (group A) consisted of 30 patients (mean age, 10.5 +/- 2.5 years) with retrocecal appendix, while the other group (group B) included 22 patients (mean age, 10.9 +/- 2.3 years) with the appendix lying free in the peritoneal cavity. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in terms of patient age, gender, success rate of SPICES, mean operating time, mean follow-up period, overall complication rates or mean postoperative hospitalization period. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SPICES is a safe and feasible approach even in patients with retrocecal acute appendicitis.
Appendectomy
;
Appendicitis
;
Appendix
;
Cecum
;
Child
;
Cosmetics
;
Deception
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Hospitalization
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
Peritoneum
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Spices