OBJECTIVETo find out how GATA-1 and GATA-2 behave in the bone marrow of patients with Monge's disease.

METHODSThe levels of mRNA in mononuclear cells (MNC) and proteins of GATA-1 and GATA-2 in the bone marrow of patients with Monge's disease and controls were determined by RT-PCR and immune cytolysis chemical method.

RESULTS(1) All patients and controls expressed GATA-1 mRNA (Monge's disease 1.033 +/- 0.146, Control 0.458 +/- 0.076) and GATA-2 mRNA (Monge's disease 0.451 +/- 0.073, Control 0.185 +/- 0.074). All patients expressed both GATA-1 (positive cell counts 77.3 +/- 33.3, positive score 135.4 +/- 75.4) and GATA-2 ( positive cell counts 29.4 +/- 11.4, positive score 48.4 +/- 19.7). All the controls expressed GATA-1 (positive cell counts 18.1 +/- 11.3, positive score 24.2 +/- 13.4) while 12 of 20 controls expressed GATA-2 ( positive cell counts 5.4 +/- 3.0, positive score 7.3 +/- 4.2). The expression of mRNA and proteins of GATA-1 and GATA-2 in Monge's disease were higher than in controls (P < 0.01). (2) There was a positive correlation between GATA-1 and Hb (P < 0.01), as did between mRNA and proteins of GATA-1 and GATA-2. (3) Both the proteins of GATA-1 and GATA-2 located only in the cytoplasm but not the nucleus.

CONCLUSIONSTwo of inherent genes, GATA-1 and GATA-2 which were expressed at higher levels in patients with Monge's disease than in controls might play significant roles in the pathogenesis of Monge's disease.

Adult ; Altitude Sickness ; metabolism ; GATA1 Transcription Factor ; metabolism ; GATA2 Transcription Factor ; metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Polycythemia ; metabolism ; RNA, Messenger ; metabolism

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the survival and toxicities in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) treated by concurrent chemoradiothrapy with either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. Materials and Methods: A total of 112 consecutive CESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. 3D-CRT and IMRT groups had been analyzed by propensity score matching method, with sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, induction chemotherapy, and tumor stage well matched. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicities were compared between two groups by Fisher exact test. Results: With a median follow-up time of 34.9 months, the 3-year OS (p=0.927) and PFS (p=0.859) rate was 49.6% and 45.8% in 3D-CRT group, compared with 54.4% and 42.8% in IMRT group. The rates of grade ≥ 3 esophagitis, grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, esophageal stricture, and hemorrhage were comparable between two groups, while the rate of tracheostomy dependence was much higher in IMRT group than 3D-CRT group (14.3% vs.1.8%, p=0.032). Radiotherapy technique (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.79) and pretreatment hoarseness (HR, 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.70) were independently prognostic of tracheostomy dependence. Conclusion No survival benefits had been observed while comparing IMRT versus 3D-CRT in CESCC patients. IMRT with fraction dose escalation and pretreatment hoarseness were considered to be associated with a higher risk for tracheostomy dependence. Radiation dose escalation beyond 60 Gy should be taken into account carefully when using IMRT with hypofractionated regimen.