Individuals with disabilities have different needs and concerns at different stages of life. The arrival of puberty brings about new challenges especially for females with issues related to menstrual care involving both the patient and their caregivers. This case report is about a 13-year-old girl with Down syndrome who was cared for by her widowed father since the age of six. She was suffering from severe mental disability. Her father was concerned, because she was unable to maintain personal hygiene during menses such as changing sanitary napkins and managing stains, hence requested for menstrual manipulation. Options for menstrual manipulation for individuals with disabilities include both medical and surgical interventions. Hormonal therapy options include oral contraceptive pills, depoprovera, progestin implants and progesterone release intra-uterine contraceptive devices. Surgical options such as hysterectomy or endometrial ablation may be considered as a last resort as it is more invasive and irreversible, involving ethical and legal implications. Selection of the suitable therapy involves shared decision making between health care provider and caregiver taking into consideration the patient’s best interest. This case report also highlights the role of family physicians in managing and coordinating care on delicate issues related to menstrual care for people with disabilities. This case report may serve as a guide to physicians and families with special needs children, while approaching issues on menstrual care.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) epidemic remains a significant burden in Malaysia. Stigma related to HIV and its effect on the quality of life (QOL) of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) remains under-reported. The aim of the present study was to assess self-perceived stigma amongst PLHIV attending an urban community clinic and its influence on their QOL. Data was collected using HIV Stigma Scale and WHO-QOL HIV BREF Scale. The overall stigma experienced by PLHIV in this community was higher than previous studies (mean ± SD; 103.37 ±18.14). Majority participants had fear disclosing their disease status, while personalized stigma or the experience of prejudice and rejection was the least experienced. The overall QOL was low and was significantly impaired in social relationship domain (mean ± SD; 12.72 ± 3.59). However, their ability to perform daily activities was not affected by the illness (mean ± SD; 14.48 ± 2.91). PLHIV with higher spiritual values demonstrate lower perception of negative self-image and inferiority (r= -0.54). This finding was unique to PLHIV in this study and suggested the importance of spirituality and personal beliefs on their self-esteem. In conclusion, stigma remains as a significant problem among PLHIV in this community. Primary care offers the best platform to promote a holistic management of PLHIV, where the integration between counselors, religious experts, family and non-governmental associations could come together. The management of PLHIV is unique in every community, hence individualized approach based on cultural norms and beliefs could assist in the overall management of