In Korea, every worker should undergo a preemployment medical examination according to Law for Occupational Safety and Health. But evaluation of it has not been previously carried out. Thus a telephone survey of 213 establishments of Inchon area for evaluation of preemployment medical examination in Korea was conducted. One hundred and fourteen companies(46.5% of all the subjects) were examined medically on preemployment, 47 establishments(41.2% of this study subjects) reevaluated workers by each establishment's medical criteria, and only less than half of diseased workers(DM 38.6% ; hypertension 42.1%, HBV carrier 28.0 % ; active pulmonary tuberculosis 7.9 %; back pain 12.3 %, and noise induced hearing loss 18.4 %) were employed. Employee's fees for preemployment medical examination were covered by 53.5 % of all the subjects. From our survey, it is clear that preemployment medical examination plays discriminating role on the employment of workers based on health status. We thus proposed to change over from preemployment medical examination to preplacement examination based on the evaluation of essential job functions and reasonable accommodation.
Back Pain ; Employment ; Fees and Charges ; Hearing Loss ; Hypertension ; Incheon ; Jurisprudence ; Korea* ; Noise ; Occupational Health ; Telephone ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Inflammatory fibrosarcoma is an uncommon disease that results from accumulation of inflammatory cells and relatively high recurrences rate in childhood. It has been reported that it most often occurs in lungs and sometimes in gastrointestinal tract, and head and neck. Head and neck lesion is from nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Early symptoms are nonspecific and early diagnosis is difficult. Most cases are therefore diagnosed at the late stage. Invasion of inflammatory fibrosarcoma to orbital wall, cribriform plate and skull base is also common. We present a 75-year-old woman with inflammatory fibrosarcoma, which occurred in the right maxillary sinus and nasal cavity.
Aged ; Early Diagnosis ; Ethmoid Bone ; Female ; Fibrosarcoma* ; Gastrointestinal Tract ; Head ; Humans ; Lung ; Maxillary Sinus* ; Nasal Cavity ; Neck ; Orbit ; Recurrence ; Skull Base

Cumulative trauma disorders were surveyed in a cross-sectional study of 100 male ship yard workers and 43 male office workers. And baseline checklist for risk assessment of cumulative trauma disorders was applicated in a ship making process. Cases of cumulative trauma disorders were defined using physical examinations and electronic diagnostic methods. Data on demographics, individual factors (medical condition), work organization and psychosocial aspects of work were obtained by questionnaire. Association between the above factors and cumulative trauma disorders were assessed by multiple logistic regression models. 29(29 %) participants of male shipyard workers and 4(9.2 %) study subjects of male office workers met our case definitions for cumulative trauma disorders. The myofascial pain syndrome of neck muscles(12 % of participants) and carpal tunnel syndrome(5 % of participants) were the major two medical conditions in shipyard workers. The odds of male shipyard workers for cumulative trauma disorders to male office workers was 3.15 after adjustment of age(95 % C.I. :2.25-5.44). And the variables such as duration of present job, HIVD condition, and surges in workload were associated at least one of the cumulative trauma disorders in the final models (p<0.05) . This study indicates that work related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders are relatively common among shipyard workers, and shows that the psychosocial factors is not likely to be related to the occur rences of these disorders in heavy workers. Also we developed baseline checklist for risk assessment of cumulative trauma disorders. The checklist was unique in that its expected users were industrial hygienists and occupational healthing nurses who did not have much ergonomic background and in that it was targeted to Korean workers in various types. As the first application of the checklist, shipyard workers were evaluated.
Checklist* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cumulative Trauma Disorders* ; Demography ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Myofascial Pain Syndromes ; Neck ; Occupational Health ; Physical Examination ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Risk Assessment* ; Ships ; Upper Extremity

Cumulative trauma disorders were surveyed in a cross-sectional study of 100 male ship yard workers and 43 male office workers. And baseline checklist for risk assessment of cumulative trauma disorders was applicated in a ship making process. Cases of cumulative trauma disorders were defined using physical examinations and electronic diagnostic methods. Data on demographics, individual factors (medical condition), work organization and psychosocial aspects of work were obtained by questionnaire. Association between the above factors and cumulative trauma disorders were assessed by multiple logistic regression models. 29(29 %) participants of male shipyard workers and 4(9.2 %) study subjects of male office workers met our case definitions for cumulative trauma disorders. The myofascial pain syndrome of neck muscles(12 % of participants) and carpal tunnel syndrome(5 % of participants) were the major two medical conditions in shipyard workers. The odds of male shipyard workers for cumulative trauma disorders to male office workers was 3.15 after adjustment of age(95 % C.I. :2.25-5.44). And the variables such as duration of present job, HIVD condition, and surges in workload were associated at least one of the cumulative trauma disorders in the final models (p<0.05) . This study indicates that work related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders are relatively common among shipyard workers, and shows that the psychosocial factors is not likely to be related to the occur rences of these disorders in heavy workers. Also we developed baseline checklist for risk assessment of cumulative trauma disorders. The checklist was unique in that its expected users were industrial hygienists and occupational healthing nurses who did not have much ergonomic background and in that it was targeted to Korean workers in various types. As the first application of the checklist, shipyard workers were evaluated.
Checklist* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cumulative Trauma Disorders* ; Demography ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Myofascial Pain Syndromes ; Neck ; Occupational Health ; Physical Examination ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Risk Assessment* ; Ships ; Upper Extremity

To determine the recovery time from noise-induced temporary threshold shift (TTS), a prospective field study was conducted at three worksites where workers are known to be exposed high level of noise. Subjects were selected according to answers on a questionnaire which inquired about otological history and previous noise exposure, including avocational, military and occupational exposures. After excluding employees with past otologic problems, recent exposure to high level noise, and under medications, total 92 employees participated in the study. Among 92 participants, complete consecutive audiometric examinations were carried out at 0~2 hours, 5~7 hours, 14~16 hours after worktime noise exposure on 26 participants wearing hearing protectors and 22 participants wearing no protective devices. The difference between the hearing level 0~2 hours after noise exposure and 5~7 hours is statistically significant by paired t-test(p<0.01). The median recovery times calculated from the data of 22 participants wearing no protective hearing devices are 15.6 hours at 4000 Hz, and 7.7 hours, 10.3 hours, 8.4 hours at 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 8000 Hz respectively. These data suggest that when measuring the pure tone audiometry for noise exposed workers, at least 16 hours noise-free interval is required.
Audiometry ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ; Humans ; Military Personnel ; Noise ; Occupational Exposure ; Prospective Studies ; Protective Devices ; Questionnaires ; Workplace

To determine the recovery time from noise-induced temporary threshold shift (TTS), a prospective field study was conducted at three worksites where workers are known to be exposed high level of noise. Subjects were selected according to answers on a questionnaire which inquired about otological history and previous noise exposure, including avocational, military and occupational exposures. After excluding employees with past otologic problems, recent exposure to high level noise, and under medications, total 92 employees participated in the study. Among 92 participants, complete consecutive audiometric examinations were carried out at 0~2 hours, 5~7 hours, 14~16 hours after worktime noise exposure on 26 participants wearing hearing protectors and 22 participants wearing no protective devices. The difference between the hearing level 0~2 hours after noise exposure and 5~7 hours is statistically significant by paired t-test(p<0.01). The median recovery times calculated from the data of 22 participants wearing no protective hearing devices are 15.6 hours at 4000 Hz, and 7.7 hours, 10.3 hours, 8.4 hours at 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz and 8000 Hz respectively. These data suggest that when measuring the pure tone audiometry for noise exposed workers, at least 16 hours noise-free interval is required.
Audiometry ; Hearing ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced ; Humans ; Military Personnel ; Noise ; Occupational Exposure ; Prospective Studies ; Protective Devices ; Questionnaires ; Workplace

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement in the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven cases, who underwent the ulnar shortening osteotomy with or without arthroscopic debridement for treatment of the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance, were included. The mean age was 40.3 years (range, 21 to 63 years) and the mean follow-up period was 20.6 months (range, 12 to 60 months). The ulnar shortening osteotomy alone and the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement were performed in 14 and 13 cases respectively. Pre- and postoperative functional results of the wrist were evaluated by the modified Mayo wrist score. RESULTS: The ulnar variance was corrected from 4.61 mm (range, 1.8~10 mm) to -0.06 mm (range, -3.3~3.1 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and from 3.01 mm (range, 1.2~7.6 mm) to -0.74 mm (range, -1.8~0 mm) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group. The final results of the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, and fair in 5 cases. Those of the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debridement group were excellent in 6 cases, good in 2 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 2 cases. The modified Mayo wrist score at the last follow-up were 83.57(range, 75~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy alone group and 83.35(range, 40~100) in the ulnar shortening osteotomy with arthroscopic debirdement group. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between two groups (p=0.43). CONCLUSION: The ulnar shortening osteotomy is valuable treatment for the idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome with positive ulnar variance. The combined arthroscopic debridment does not appear to have positive influence to the final results.
Debridement ; Follow-Up Studies ; Osteotomy ; Wrist