PURPOSE: This study was conducted to describe the trends and age-period-cohort effects on the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer among ≥ 20-year-old women from 1993 to 2012 were obtained from the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the Korean Statistical Information Service. Age-standardized rates were calculated and Joinpoint regression was used to evaluate the trends in the incidence and mortality rate. Age-period-cohort analysis was performed to investigate the independent effects of age, period and cohort. RESULTS: The incidence of cervical cancer decreased from 32.8 per 100,000 in 1993 to 15.9 per 100,000 in 2012 (annual percent change [APC], –3.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –4.2% to –3.6%). The mortality rate decreased from 5.2 per 100,000 in 1993 to 2.1 per 100,000 in 2012 (APC, –4.8%; 95% CI, –5.1% to –4.4%); however, the incidence and mortality rates among young women (< 30 years old) increased. An age-period-cohort model of the incidence and mortality rate showed decreasing period effects between 1993 and 2008 and decreasing cohort effects between 1928 and 1973, while birth cohorts after 1973 exhibited slight increases in the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer. CONCLUSION: Recent decreases in the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer were due to decreases in the period and cohort effects, which reflect the implementation of a cancer screening program and changes in lifestyle. However, our findings also highlighted an increase in cohort effects on the incidence and mortality rate among young women born after 1973.
Cohort Effect ; Cohort Studies ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence* ; Information Services ; Korea* ; Life Style ; Mortality* ; Parturition ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVES: As a baseline study to aid in the development of proper policy, we investigated the current condition of unpreparedness of documents required when issuing copies of medical records and related factors. METHODS: The study was comprised of 7,203 cases in which copies of medical records were issued from July 1st, 2007 through June 30th, 2008 to 5 tertiary referral hospitals. Data from these hospitals was collected using their established electronic databases and included study variables such as unpreparedness of the required documents as a dependent variable and putative covariates. RESULTS: The rate of unpreparedness of required documents was 14.9%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the following factors as being related to the high rate of unpreparedness: patient age (older patients had a higher rate), issuance channels (on admission > via out-patient clinic), type of applicant (others such as family members > for oneself > insurers), type of original medical record (utilization records on admission > other records), issuance purpose (for providing insurer > medical use), residential area of applicant (Seoul > Honam province and Jeju), and number of copied documents (more documents gave a lower rate). The rate of unpreparedness differed significantly among the hospitals; suggesting that they may have followed their own conventional protocols rather than legal procedures in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that the level of compliance to the required legal procedure was high, but that problems occurred in assuring the safety of the medical information. A proper legislative approach is therefore required to balance the security of and access to medical information.
Coat Protein Complex I ; Compliance ; Electronics ; Electrons ; Humans ; Insurance Carriers ; Logistic Models ; Medical Records ; Outpatients ; Tertiary Care Centers

Objectives: This study revised the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2018 for rapid cycling. Methods: Questionnaires to survey the expert opinion of medication for rapid cycling were completed by a review committee consisting of 87 Korean expert psychiatrists. The experts’ opinions were classified into three categories based on the lowest category in which the confidence interval fell (6.5≤ for first-line, 3.5≤ for second-line, and 3.5> for third-line treatment). Results: The first-line treatments were a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, or mood stabilizer monotherapy. Furthermore, a mood stabilizer with lamotrigine therapy and an atypical antipsychotic with lamotrigine combinations was the first-line treatment for a depressive episode. The first-line medications in all episodes were valproate, lithium, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. Risperidone was the first-line medication in manic episodes and mixed states, and lamotrigine was the first-line medication for treating depressive episodes. Conclusion Compared to the surveys in 2018, the preference for atypical antipsychotics and lamotrigine has increased, and the modalities as a second-line treatment are more diversified.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to revise the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) 2022: children and adolescents. Methods: We performed a survey, using a questionnaire comprising 23 questions according to various situations facing children and adolescents with bipolar disorders. A total of 40 of the 60 experts in child and adolescent psychiatry responded to the survey. Results: The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic and depressive episodes in children with bipolar disorders were a combination of mood stabilizer (MS) and atypical antipsychotics (AAP). The first-line medications selected for these children were aripiprazole (treatment of choice, TOC) and risperidone. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP (TOC), monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole, risperidone, and quetiapine were selected as first-line medications for these adolescents. First-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for depressive episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP, monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the depressive episodes in adolescents at high risk for bipolar disorder were a combination of MS and AAP and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole (TOC), quetiapine, and risperidone were selected as first-line medications for the treatment of depressive episodes in adolescents with bipolar disorder. Conclusion It is expected that the present KMAP-BP 2022: children and adolescents will give the direction and be usefully applied by clinicians to treat children and adolescents with bipolar disorders.

Objectives: In this study, we investigated and organized the maintenance-treatment strategies for Bipolar I and II disorders outlined in The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022). Methods: The questionnaire sought to survey expert opinion on medication for bipolar disorders and was completed by a review committee consisting of 87 experienced Korean psychiatrists. It comprised 56 questions, and each question included various sub-items. The questionnaire for the maintenance treatments covered overall treatment strategies after acute mood episodes in bipolar I and II disorders, the choice of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, duration of medication, and treatment strategies for breakthrough symptoms. Results: In the case of bipolar I disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics were selected as the first-line treatments. In maintenance management of bipolar II disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and combinations of mood stabilizers were selected as the preferred first-line treatments. Conclusion There has been a growing body of evidence that atypical antipsychotics have a greater preference than observed in the previous KMAP-BP of 2018. Also, monotherapy of mood stabilizers or atypical antipsychotics was more frequently selected in KMAP-BP 2022 than in the KMAP-BP 2018.

Objectives: The safety and tolerability of drugs are very important to ensure compliance and efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorders. An expert opinion survey was conducted on treatment strategies in various special clinical situations, such as patients with significant weight gain, reporting characteristic drug side effects, low drug adherence, pregnant and reproductive women, and genetic counseling. Methods: A written survey that addressed treatment strategies related to safety and tolerability was prepared. The survey focused on significant weight gain, characteristic drug side effects, low drug adherence, treatment of pregnant and reproductive women, and genetic counseling. Eighty-seven experts in the review committee completed the survey. Results: In the case of weight gain occurring during drug treatment, it was considered preferable to replace the treatment drug with a drug that caused less weight gain, such as lamotrigine, aripiprazole, or ziprasidone. If there was a significant weight gain due to the treatment drug, it was considered preferable to intervene as soon as possible. In the case of hyperprolactinemia, it was considered preferable to change the drug. It was recommended that the drug beto discontinued in case of a benign rash as seen in patients treated with lamotrigine. For improving drug adherence, there was an increased preference for long-acting injections. It was also opined that antipsychotics should be used with great caution in pregnant or reproductive women. Conclusion Treatment strategies in various clinical situations related to the safety and tolerability of drugs for bipolar disorder have been described. It is hoped that this information would be useful in practical clinical situations.

Objectives: The present study was carried out to revise the guidelines for the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) 2018. The revision was carried out based on expert opinions to facilitate clinical decisions related to the treatment of bipolar disorders in patients with comorbid physical illnesses. Methods: A 56-item questionnaire was developed; a consensus was arrived at by 87 out of 93 experts (93.5%), on the pharmacological treatment strategies to be used in cases of comorbid physical illnesses accompanying bipolar disorders. Results: For patients with bipolar disorder exhibiting comorbid conditions, by consensus, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, and ziprasidone were recommended as the first-line strategies for metabolic syndrome; lamotrigine and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for cardiovascular problems; lithium and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for haptic problems; valproate, lamotrigine, aripiprazole, and quetiapine were the recommended first-line strategies for renal problems; and valproate and aripiprazole were the recommended first-line strategies for cerebrovascular problems or cerebral damage. Conclusion The present study is the most recent consensus among experts on recommendations for the treatment of bipolar disorders in patients with comorbid physical illnesses. Aripiprazole was recommended as the first-line pharmacotherapeutic agent in five comorbid physical conditions. This recommendation is similar to KMAP-BP 2018. Additionally, lamotrigine has been added as a first -line pharmacotherapeutic agent in patients with the metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular problems, and renal problems in the current algorithm.

Objectives: The fifth revision of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) was undertaken to provide more precise guidelines for clinicians. In this study, we evaluated treatment strategies recommended by the KMAP-BP 2022 for theelderly patients with bipolar disorder. Methods: The review committee comprised eighty-seven psychiatrists with vast clinical experience in treating bipolar disorders, who completed a survey. An expert consensus was obtained on pharmacological treatment strategies for elderly patients with bipolar disorders. The executive committee analyzed the data and discussed the results to produce the final algorithm. Results: In elderly patients with bipolar disorders, the first-line treatment option for manic episodes is monotherapy, with atypical antipsychotics or mood stabilizers, and a combination of a mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotics. The first-line treatment option for depressive episodes was a combination of a mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotics, monotherapy with atypical antipsychotics or a mood stabilizer or lamotrigine, and a combination of atypical antipsychotics or a mood stabilizer with lamotrigine. Conclusion In the KMAP-BP 2022, the recommendation for treatment options for elderly patients with bipolar disorder, has been newly introduced. We expect that this algorithm would provide valuable information for the treatment of elderly patients with bipolar disorder.

Objectives: Treatment guidelines or an algorithm can help clinicians implement better practices and clinical decisions. Therefore, the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022) was revised again through a consensus of expert opinion. The diagnosis and treatment of mixed features are not simple, and there are many things to discuss. We describe the preferences and recommendations from KMAP-BP 2022 for the treatment of mood episodes with mixed features. Methods: We revised the KMAP-BP 2018 questionnaire and conducted the survey with expert clinicians. Out of ninety-three members of the review committee, eighty-seven completed the survey. We analyzed the answers, discussed the data, and held a clinician hearing. Results: In first-step strategies for mixed features with more manic symptoms, a combination of a mood stabilizer and an atypical antipsychotic is the treatment of choice. Mood stabilizer monotherapy and atypical antipsychotic monotherapy are preferred strategies. For mixed features with more depressive symptoms, a combination of mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotic, a combination of atypical antipsychotic and lamotrigine (LMT), atypical antipsychotic monotherapy, a combination of mood stabilizer and LMT, and mood stabilizer monotherapy are preferred. For mixed features with similar manic symptoms and depressive symptoms, a combination of mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotic, atypical antipsychotic monotherapy, and mood stabilizer monotherapy are preferred. Conclusion For mixed features, a combination of mood stabilizer and atypical antipsychotic is generally preferred, and LMT is preferred for depressive symptoms. Compared with KMAP-BP 2018, more diverse strategies and drugs are being attempted for the treatment of mixed features.

Objectives: After the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) was developed in 2002, its fifth revision was completed in 2022 to reflect the recent rapid developments and research into bipolar disorder and its psychopharmacology. Methods: According to the methodology for previous versions, the depressive episode section of KMAP-BP 2022 was revised based on a survey consisting of 11 questions. Among ninetythree experts, eighty-seven members of the review committee (93.5%) completed the survey.The executive committee analyzed the results and discussed the final production of an algorithm by considering the scientific evidence. Results: Overall, the results from this study showed little change in comparison with previous versions of KMAP-BP. However, there have been significant changes in recommendations over the span of about 20 years. The preferences for lamotrigine and atypical antipsychotics, especially aripiprazole, quetiapine, and olanzapine, have shown a tendency to continuously increase, but the preferences for risperidone and ziprasidone have not increased, but have decreased. Moreover, the preference for typical antipsychotics has significantly decreased. Additionally, concerns over the use of antidepressants in bipolar depression have been raised, and their use is not recommended in KMAP-BP 2022 as a first-line treatment. Conclusion Pharmacotherapy for acute depressive episodes with various clinical progressions and various subtypes still shows diversity, compared to pharmacotherapy for mania. We look forward to the development of bipolar depressive, episode-specific therapeutic drugs in the future, and hope the fifth update of KMAP-BP will be a complementary option for clinicians and their patients with bipolar disorder.