No abstract available.
Cephalometry ; Prognathism* ; Retrognathia*

In 1986, Altemir published the first article on submental intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy for managing difficult airways. This review provides an overview of submental/submandibular intubation, covering its development, techniques, and clinical outcomes. Initially devised to address difficult airways in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the technique has since evolved. Recent advancements include focused surgical incisions, ultrasound-guided imaging, and the use of improved procedural tools like the Seldinger technique. Clinical trials have demonstrated that submental/submandibular intubation is generally more efficient and quicker than tracheostomy in trauma patients. One of its key advantages is the absence of visible scarring, along with a less invasive recovery process. However, the technique has some limitations, including risks of infection, bleeding, and scarring, which require further investigation to optimize its application. While submental/submandibular intubation remains a valuable method for managing difficult airways, ongoing refinement and evaluation are necessary to maximize its clinical utility. This technique presents an excellent alternative in specific surgical scenarios and offers a simplified solution where other intubation methods may be unfeasible.

In 1986, Altemir published the first article on submental intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy for managing difficult airways. This review provides an overview of submental/submandibular intubation, covering its development, techniques, and clinical outcomes. Initially devised to address difficult airways in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the technique has since evolved. Recent advancements include focused surgical incisions, ultrasound-guided imaging, and the use of improved procedural tools like the Seldinger technique. Clinical trials have demonstrated that submental/submandibular intubation is generally more efficient and quicker than tracheostomy in trauma patients. One of its key advantages is the absence of visible scarring, along with a less invasive recovery process. However, the technique has some limitations, including risks of infection, bleeding, and scarring, which require further investigation to optimize its application. While submental/submandibular intubation remains a valuable method for managing difficult airways, ongoing refinement and evaluation are necessary to maximize its clinical utility. This technique presents an excellent alternative in specific surgical scenarios and offers a simplified solution where other intubation methods may be unfeasible.

In 1986, Altemir published the first article on submental intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy for managing difficult airways. This review provides an overview of submental/submandibular intubation, covering its development, techniques, and clinical outcomes. Initially devised to address difficult airways in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the technique has since evolved. Recent advancements include focused surgical incisions, ultrasound-guided imaging, and the use of improved procedural tools like the Seldinger technique. Clinical trials have demonstrated that submental/submandibular intubation is generally more efficient and quicker than tracheostomy in trauma patients. One of its key advantages is the absence of visible scarring, along with a less invasive recovery process. However, the technique has some limitations, including risks of infection, bleeding, and scarring, which require further investigation to optimize its application. While submental/submandibular intubation remains a valuable method for managing difficult airways, ongoing refinement and evaluation are necessary to maximize its clinical utility. This technique presents an excellent alternative in specific surgical scenarios and offers a simplified solution where other intubation methods may be unfeasible.

In 1986, Altemir published the first article on submental intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy for managing difficult airways. This review provides an overview of submental/submandibular intubation, covering its development, techniques, and clinical outcomes. Initially devised to address difficult airways in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the technique has since evolved. Recent advancements include focused surgical incisions, ultrasound-guided imaging, and the use of improved procedural tools like the Seldinger technique. Clinical trials have demonstrated that submental/submandibular intubation is generally more efficient and quicker than tracheostomy in trauma patients. One of its key advantages is the absence of visible scarring, along with a less invasive recovery process. However, the technique has some limitations, including risks of infection, bleeding, and scarring, which require further investigation to optimize its application. While submental/submandibular intubation remains a valuable method for managing difficult airways, ongoing refinement and evaluation are necessary to maximize its clinical utility. This technique presents an excellent alternative in specific surgical scenarios and offers a simplified solution where other intubation methods may be unfeasible.

In 1986, Altemir published the first article on submental intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy for managing difficult airways. This review provides an overview of submental/submandibular intubation, covering its development, techniques, and clinical outcomes. Initially devised to address difficult airways in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the technique has since evolved. Recent advancements include focused surgical incisions, ultrasound-guided imaging, and the use of improved procedural tools like the Seldinger technique. Clinical trials have demonstrated that submental/submandibular intubation is generally more efficient and quicker than tracheostomy in trauma patients. One of its key advantages is the absence of visible scarring, along with a less invasive recovery process. However, the technique has some limitations, including risks of infection, bleeding, and scarring, which require further investigation to optimize its application. While submental/submandibular intubation remains a valuable method for managing difficult airways, ongoing refinement and evaluation are necessary to maximize its clinical utility. This technique presents an excellent alternative in specific surgical scenarios and offers a simplified solution where other intubation methods may be unfeasible.

The video laryngoscope is a novel instrument for intubation that enables indirect visualization of the upper airway. It is recognized for its ability to enhance Cormack-Lehane grades in the management of difficult airways.Notably, video laryngoscopy is associated with equal or higher rates of intubation success within a shorter time frame than direct laryngoscopy.Video laryngoscopy facilitates faster and easier visualization of the glottis and reduces the need for Magill forceps, thereby shortening the intubation time. Despite the advanced glottic visualization afforded by video laryngoscopy, nasotracheal tube insertion and advancement occasionally fail. This is particularly evident during nasotracheal intubation, where oropharyngeal blood or secretions may obstruct the visual field on the monitor, thereby complicating video laryngoscopy. Moreover, the use of Magill forceps is markedly challenging or nearly unfeasible in this context, especially in pediatric cases. Furthermore, the substantial blade size of video laryngoscopes may restrict their applicability in individuals with limited oral apertures.This study aimed to review the literature on video laryngoscopy, discuss its clinical role in nasotracheal intubation, and address the challenges that anesthesiologists may encounter during the intubation process.

BACKGROUND: Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (FNI) is performed if it is difficult to open the mouth or if intubation using laryngoscope is expected to be difficult. However, training is necessary because intubation performed by inexperienced operators leads to complications. METHODS: Every resident performed intubation in 40 patients. Success of FNI was evaluated as the time of FNI. First intubation time was restricted to 2 min 30 s. If the second attempt was unsuccessful, it was considered a failed case, and a specialist performed nasotracheal intubation. If the general method of intubation was expected to be difficult, awake intubation was performed. The degree of nasal bleeding during intubation was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the operators (11 men, 7 women) was 27.8 years. FNI was performed in a total of 716 patients. The success rate was 88.3% for the first attempt and 94.6% for the second attempt. The failure rate of intubation in anesthetized patients was 4.9%, and 13.6% in awake patients. When intubation was performed in anesthetized patients, the failure rate from the first to fifth trial was 9.6%, which decreased to 0.7% when the number of trials increased to > 30 times. In terms of awake intubation, there was no failed attempt when the resident had performed the FNI > 30 times. The number of FNIs performed and nasal bleeding were important factors influencing the failure rate. CONCLUSION: The success rate of FNI increased as the number of FNI performed by residents increased despite the nasal bleeding.
Epistaxis ; Humans ; Intubation* ; Laryngoscopes ; Learning Curve ; Learning* ; Male ; Methods ; Mouth ; Specialization

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with Alzheimer's disease is growing worldwide, and the proportion of patients requiring dental treatment under general anesthesia increases with increasing severity of the disease. However, outpatient anesthesia management for these patients involves great risks, as most patients with Alzheimer's disease are old and may show reduced cardiopulmonary functions and have cognitive disorders. METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated 43 patients with Alzheimer's disease who received outpatient anesthesia for dental treatment between 2012–2017. Pre-anesthesia patient evaluation, dental treatment details, anesthetics dose, blood pressure, duration and procedure of anesthesia, and post-recovery management were analyzed and compared between patients who underwent general anesthesia or intravenous sedation. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was about 70 years; mean duration of Alzheimer's disease since diagnosis was 6.3 years. Severity was assessed using the global deterioration scale; 62.8% of patients were in level ≥ 6. Mean duration of anesthesia was 178 minutes for general anesthesia and 85 minutes for intravenous sedation. Mean recovery time was 65 minutes. Eleven patients underwent intravenous sedation using propofol, and 22/32 cases involved total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesia was maintained with desflurane for other patients. While maintaining anesthesia, inotropic and atropine were used for eight and four patients, respectively. No patient developed postoperative delirium. All patients were discharged without complications. CONCLUSION: With appropriate anesthetic management, outpatient anesthesia was successfully performed without complications for dental treatment for patients with severe Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimer Disease* ; Anesthesia* ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Intravenous ; Anesthetics ; Atropine ; Blood Pressure ; Delirium ; Dementia ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Outpatients* ; Propofol ; Retrospective Studies*