1.Effect of revascularization strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and renal insufficiency with multivessel disease.
Hyukjin PARK ; Young Joon HONG ; Si Hyun RHEW ; Sung Soo KIM ; Young Wook JEONG ; Hae Chang JEONG ; Jae Yeong CHO ; Soo Young JANG ; Ki Hong LEE ; Keun Ho PARK ; Doo Sun SIM ; Nam Sik YOON ; Hyun Ju YOON ; Kye Hun KIM ; Hyung Wook PARK ; Ju Han KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Jeong Gwan CHO ; Jong Chun PARK
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2015;30(2):177-190
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of complications and outcome between infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularization and multivessel (MV) revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with renal insufficiency and MV disease. METHODS: A total of 1,031 acute MI patients with renal insufficiency and MV disease who were registered in the Korea Working Group on Myocardial Infarction were enrolled. They were divided into two groups (IRA-only revascularization group, n = 404; MV revascularization group, n = 627), and investigated the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the incidence of complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). RESULTS: Complications after PCI occurred in 19.9% of all patients (206/1,031). Complications after PCI occurred more frequently in the MV revascularization group compared with the IRA-only revascularization group (20.1% [126/627] vs. 15.3% [62/404], respectively; p = 0.029]. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 6.3%, and there was no significant difference between the groups (5.2% in the IRA-only revascularization group vs. 7.0% in the MV revascularization group; p = 0.241). The total incidence of MACE was 11.1%, and there was no significant difference between the groups (11.6% in the IRA-only revascularization group vs. 10.7% in the MV revascularization group; p = 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of complications after PCI was significantly lower in the IRA-only revascularization group compared with the MV revascularization group. However, there were no significant difference in the 12-month outcomes between groups in patients with acute MI and renal insufficiency with MV disease.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Coronary Artery Disease/complications/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Female
;
Glomerular Filtration Rate
;
Hospital Mortality
;
Humans
;
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
;
Kidney/physiopathology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Myocardial Infarction/complications/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/*methods/mortality
;
Prospective Studies
;
Recurrence
;
Registries
;
Renal Insufficiency/diagnosis/*etiology/mortality/physiopathology
;
Republic of Korea
;
Risk Factors
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Amlodipine and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients: meta-analysis comparing amlodipine-based versus other antihypertensive therapy.
Seung Ah LEE ; Hong Mi CHOI ; Hye Jin PARK ; Su Kyoung KO ; Hae Young LEE
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2014;29(3):315-324
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This meta-analysis compared the effects of amlodipine besylate, a charged dihydropyridine-type calcium channel blocker (CCB), with other non-CCB antihypertensive therapies regarding the cardiovascular outcome. METHODS: Data from seven long-term outcome trials comparing the cardiovascular outcomes of an amlodipine-based regimen with other active regimens were pooled and analyzed. RESULTS: The risk of myocardial infarction was significantly decreased with an amlodipine-based regimen compared with a non-CCB-based regimen (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.99; p = 0.03). The risk of stroke was also significantly decreased (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.90; p < 0.00001). The risk of heart failure increased slightly with marginal significance for an amlodipine-based regimen compared with a non-CCB-based regimen (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.31; p = 0.08). However, when compared overall with beta-blockers and diuretics, amlodipine showed a comparable risk. Amlodipine-based regimens demonstrated a 10% risk reduction in overall cardiovascular events (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.99; p = 0.02) and total mortality (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.99; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Amlodipine reduced the risk of total cardiovascular events as well as all-cause mortality compared with non-CCB-based regimens, indicating its benefit for high-risk cardiac patients.
Amlodipine/*therapeutic use
;
Antihypertensive Agents/*therapeutic use
;
Blood Pressure/*drug effects
;
Calcium Channel Blockers/*therapeutic use
;
Chi-Square Distribution
;
Clinical Trials as Topic
;
Heart Failure/etiology/mortality/*prevention & control
;
Humans
;
Hypertension/complications/diagnosis/*drug therapy/mortality/physiopathology
;
Myocardial Infarction/etiology/mortality/*prevention & control
;
Odds Ratio
;
Risk Factors
;
Stroke/etiology/mortality/*prevention & control
;
Treatment Outcome
3.Six Kawasaki disease patients with acute coronary artery thrombosis.
Shu-lai ZHOU ; Jian-ping LUO ; Yan-qi QI ; Yu-guang LIANG ; Wei WANG ; Fang-qi GONG
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2013;51(12):925-929
OBJECTIVETo improve the awareness of acute coronary artery thrombosis in Kawasaki disease (KD).
METHODSix KD patients with acute coronary artery thrombosis (Jan. 2004 to Jan. 2013) were studied retrospectively. The basic information, clinical manifestations, laboratory data, echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG), method and consequence of thrombolytic therapy were analyzed.
RESULTThe mean age of patients with coronary artery thrombosis (5 males and 1 female) was (17.2 ± 11.3) months.Five cases had thrombosis in left coronary artery (LCA), and four cases had thrombosis in aneurysm of left anterior descending artery (LAD). One case had thrombosis in both left and right coronary artery (RCA).One case died. Maximum thrombus was about 1.60 cm × 0.80 cm, locating in LAD. The diameter of LCA and RCA was (0.44 ± 0.07) cm and (0.45 ± 0.07) cm. Two patients showed abnormal ECG. Case 3 showed ST segment depression in lead V5. Case 6 showed myocardial infarction.In acute phase of KD, three patients received treatment with intravenous immunoglobin (IVIG), five patients were treated with aspirin.In sub-acute and convalescent phase of KD, all patients were treated with low-dose aspirin.Warfarin and dipyridamole were applied in 5 patients. All cases were treated with thrombolytic therapy using urokinase and/or heparin. After thrombolytic therapy, echocardiography showed thrombolysis in four cases and no change in one.One patient died of myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONMost of acute coronary thrombosis in KD occurred in LAD. KD patients with coronary artery thrombosis are at risk of sudden death due to myocardial infarction.
Acute Disease ; Anticoagulants ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Aspirin ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Child, Preschool ; Coronary Aneurysm ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Coronary Thrombosis ; diagnosis ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Fibrinolytic Agents ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome ; complications ; drug therapy ; Myocardial Infarction ; diagnosis ; etiology ; mortality ; Retrospective Studies
4.Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Hydrophilic and Lipophilic Statins in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Min Chul KIM ; Youngkeun AHN ; Su Young JANG ; Kyung Hoon CHO ; Seung Hwan HWANG ; Min Goo LEE ; Jum Suk KO ; Keun Ho PARK ; Doo Sun SIM ; Nam Sik YOON ; Hyun Ju YOON ; Kye Hun KIM ; Young Joon HONG ; Hyung Wook PARK ; Ju Han KIM ; Myung Ho JEONG ; Jeong Gwan CHO ; Jong Chun PARK ; Jung Chaee KANG
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2011;26(3):294-303
BACKGROUND/AIMS: A controversy exists about which statin is preferable for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and clinical impacts of different statins according to lipophilicity have not been established. METHODS: The 1,124 patients with AMI included in the present study were divided into hydrophilic- and lipophilic-statin groups. In-hospital complications (defined as death, cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmia, infection, bleeding, and renal insufficiency, and other fatal arrhythmias), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause death, re-myocardial infarction, re-percutaneous coronary intervention (re-PCI), and surgical revascularization were analyzed during a 1-year clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, and in-hospital complication rates showed no between-group differences (11.7% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.688). Although MACE at the 1- and 6-month clinical follow-ups occurred more in hydrophilic statin group I (1 month: 10.0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.001; 6 month: 19.9% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.022), no significant difference in MACE was observed at the 1-year follow-up (21.5% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.172). Both statin groups showed similar efficacy for reducing serum lipid concentrations. A Cox-regression analysis showed that the use of a hydrophilic statin did not predict 1-year MACE, all-cause death, AMI, or re-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Although short-term cardiovascular outcomes were better in the lipophilic-statin group, 1-year outcomes were similar in patients with AMI who were administered hydrophilic and lipophilic statins. In other words, the type of statin did not influence 1-year outcomes in patients with AMI.
Aged
;
Biological Markers/blood
;
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology/prevention & control
;
Chi-Square Distribution
;
Female
;
Hospital Mortality
;
Humans
;
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects/chemistry/*therapeutic use
;
Korea
;
Lipids/blood
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Myocardial Infarction/blood/complications/diagnosis/mortality/*therapy
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Assessment
;
Risk Factors
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome