1.Body composition: A predictive factor of cycle fecundity.
Semra KAYATAS ; Aysen BOZA ; Murat API ; Didar KURT ; Mustafa EROGLU ; Sevcan Arzu ARINKAN
Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine 2014;41(2):75-79
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of body composition on reproduction in women with unexplained infertility treated with a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination programme. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted on 308 unexplained infertile women who were scheduled for a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination programme and were grouped as pregnant and non-pregnant. Anthropometric measurements were performed using TANITA-420MA before the treatment cycle. Body composition was determined using a bioelectrical impedance analysis system. RESULTS: Body fat mass was significantly lower in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women (15.61+/-3.65 vs.18.78+/-5.97, respectively) (p=0.01). In a multiple regression analysis, body fat mass proved to have a stronger association with fecundity than the percentage of body fat, body mass index, or the waist/hip ratio (standardized regression coefficient> or =0.277, t-value> or =2.537; p<0.05). The cut-off value of fat mass, which was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, was 16.65 with a sensitivity of 61.8% and a specificity of 70.2%. Below this cut-off value, the odds of the pregnancy occurrence was found to be 2.5 times more likely. CONCLUSION: Body fat mass can be predictive for pregnancy in patients with unexplained infertility scheduled for a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination programme.
Adipose Tissue
;
Body Composition*
;
Body Mass Index
;
Electric Impedance
;
Female
;
Fertility*
;
Humans
;
Infertility
;
Insemination
;
Observational Study
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnant Women
;
Prospective Studies
;
Reproduction
;
ROC Curve
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
2.Cytotoxic effects of different self-adhesive resin cements: Cell viability and induction of apoptosis
Soner ŞIŞMANOĞLU ; Mustafa DEMIRCI ; Helmut SCHWEIKL ; Gunes OZEN-EROGLU ; Esin CETIN-AKTAS ; Serap KURUCA ; Safa TUNCER ; Neslihan TEKCE
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2020;12(2):89-99
PURPOSE:
. The effects of four different self-adhesive resin cement materials on cell viability and apoptosis after direct and indirect exposure were evaluated using different cell culture techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
. Self-adhesive cements were applied to NIH/3T3 mouse fibroblasts by the extract test method, cell culture inserts, and dentin barrier test method. After exposure periods of 24 h and 72 h, the cytotoxicity of these self-adhesive materials was evaluated using the MTT assay (viability) and the Annexin-V-FITC/PI staining (apoptosis).
RESULTS:
.The lowest cell viability was found in cells exposed to BeautiCem SA for 24 h in the extract test method. Cell viability was reduced to 70.6% compared to negative controls. After the 72 h exposure period, viability rate of cell cultures exposed to BeautiCem SA decreased more than 2- fold (29.5%) while cells exposed to RelyX U200 showed the highest viability rate of 71.4%. In the dentin barrier test method, BeautiCem SA induced the highest number of cells in apoptosis after a 24 h exposure (4.1%). Panavia SA Cement Plus was the material that caused the lowest number of cells in apoptosis (1.5%).
CONCLUSION
. The used self-adhesive cements have showed different cytotoxic effects based on the evaluation method. As exposure time increased, the materials showed more cytotoxic and apoptotic effects. BeautiCem SA caused significantly more severe cytotoxic and apoptotic effects than other cements tested. Moreover, cements other than BeautiCem SA have caused necrotic cell death rather than apoptotic cell death.
3.Coincidence of three solid tumors in a patient with multiple myeloma.
Muzaffer KEKLIK ; Serdar SIVGIN ; Kemal DENIZ ; Halit KARACA ; Olgun KONTAS ; Suleyman BALKANLI ; Celalettin EROGLU ; Ummuhan ABDULREZZAK ; Gulfugan KUZU ; Leylagul KAYNAR ; Mustafa CETIN ; Ali UNAL ; Bulent ESER
Chinese Medical Journal 2013;126(6):1186-1187