1. Antimicrobial resistance and underlying mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Ebru Şebnem YILMAZ ; Özkan ASLANTAŞ
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 2017;10(11):1059-1064
Objective To investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of 97 clinical Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains against 14 antimicrobials and corresponding resistance mechanisms. Methods The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates was determined using a disk diffusion method and antimicrobial resistance genes were screened by polymerase chain reaction. Mutations responsible for ciprofloxacin and rifampicin resistance were investigated by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. Results All isolates were found to be susceptible to vancomycin. Various rates of resistance to penicillin (83.5%), ampicillin (77.3%), erythromycin (63.9%), tetracycline (16.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (16.5%), ciprofloxacin (15.5%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (15.5%), oxacillin (13.4%), fusidic acid (12.4%), rifampin (6.2%), clindamycin (6.2%), gentamicin (6.2%) and mupirocin (5.2%) were determined. In addition, different combinations of resistance genes were identified among resistant isolates. Ciprofloxacin resistant isolates had mutations in codon 84 (Ser84Leu) and 106 (Gly106Asp) in the gyrA gene. Mutations in grlA were mostly related to Ser80Phe substitution. Leu466Ser mutation in the rpoB gene was detected in all rifampin resistant isolates. All methicillin resistant S. aureus isolates were SCCmec type V. Conclusions In conclusion, it was determined that the isolates were resistant to different classes of antimicrobials at varying rates and resistance was mediated by different genetic mechanisms. Therefore, continuous monitoring of resistance in S. aureus strains is necessary to control their resistance for clinically important antimicrobials.
2.Scapular spine base fracture with long outside-in superior or posterior screws with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Osman Nuri EROĞLU ; Buğra HÜSEMOĞLU ; Onur BAŞÇI ; Mustafa ÖZKAN ; Hasan HAVITÇIOĞLU ; Onur HAPA
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2021;24(3):141-146
Background:
The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model.
Methods:
Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws).
Results:
The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine.
Conclusions
The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.
3.Scapular spine base fracture with long outside-in superior or posterior screws with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Osman Nuri EROĞLU ; Buğra HÜSEMOĞLU ; Onur BAŞÇI ; Mustafa ÖZKAN ; Hasan HAVITÇIOĞLU ; Onur HAPA
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2021;24(3):141-146
Background:
The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of thescapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model.
Methods:
Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulars to thestudy group (spine base fixation with a four long screws, three with both long superior and long posterior screws).
Results:
The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw, 869 N vs. short screw, 1,123 N); however, this difference did notreach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine.
Conclusions
The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superioror posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.