Objective:To investigate and analyze the differences of PhD student scientific research ability, employment and development among types of postgraduate students that admitted by various of doctoral admissions under the perspective of medical students to assess and optimize the existing applications-audit system (AAS).Methods:A self-compiled questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of medical students at different grades and types on the AAS related issues. Excel and SPSS were used to perform frequency statistics, chi-square test and independent sample t-test. Results:The PhD enrolled from AAS tended to complete the paper-publication at first and second year (38.71%, 12/31; 35.48%, 11/31), while unified enrollment (UE) tended to complete in the second year (33.33%, 10/30) and seven-year degree (SYD) in the third year (40.54%, 15/37) ( P=0.021). In terms of the value of the materials required in the application stage to the doctoral research, 74.19%(23/31) of AAS students and 48.65%(18/37) of SYD students believed that scientific research results were the most helpful to the doctoral research process, while UE believed that English helped the most (26.67%, 8/30), with significant differences among groups ( P=0.002). In terms of fair recognition of enrollment in the application system, 71.53% (304/425) of graduate students believed that AAS for doctoral enrollment was fair. The institution ( P=0.001) and type of master's degree ( P=0.001) significantly affected graduate students' recognition of the fairness of AAS. Conclusion:The degree and speed of dissertation completion of the AAS PhD are prior, reflecting the advantages of AAS in the cultivation of medical doctors' scientific academic ability and achievements. The AAS plays a significant role in enhancing the reserve of high-level scientific researchers in China, and has a high recognition and influence in medical students. In the future, the application examination system will be optimized to create the most suitable way for doctoral enrollment in China.

Purpose: We aimed to identify effectiveness-associated indicators and evaluate the optimal tumor reduction rate (TRR) after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with invasive breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent at least four cycles of NAC at the Department of Breast Surgery between February 2013 and February 2020. A regression nomogram model for predicting pathological responses was constructed based on potential indicators. Results: A total of 784 patients were included, of whom 170 (21.68%) reported pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC and 614 (78.32%) had residual invasive tumors. The clinical T stage, clinical N stage, molecular subtype, and TRR were identified as independent predictors of pCR. Patients with a TRR > 35% were more likely to achieve pCR (odds ratio, 5.396; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.299–8.825). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted using the probability value, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.892 (95% CI, 0.863–0.922). Conclusion TRR > 35% is predictive of pCR after two cycles of NAC, and an early evaluation model using a nomogram based on five indicators, age, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, molecular subtype, and TRR, is applicable in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Immunotherapy modulates immune response and corrects cancer-immune cycle, controlling the tumors persistently. With the development of clinical and pre-clinical research, immunotherapy is reshaping the landscape of systematic treatment on breast cancer. However, numerous unknowns and challenges persist. This review aims to comprehensively overview the latest research progress in immunotherapy of breast cancer from mechanistic and clinical efficacy perspectives, as well as to summarize unresolved issues, offering new avenues for precision treatment of breast cancer.

Purpose: Combining targeted agents with adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients, but also increases the risk of adverse effects. The updated results of 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported in 2019. Given the lack of adequate head-to-head pairwise assessment for anti-HER2 agents, network meta-analysis facilitates obtaining more precise inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: RCTs comparing at least 2 anti-HER2 regimens in an adjuvant setting for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) were included. Hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS), with respective 95% confidence intervals were pooled for assessment of efficacy. A Bayesian statistical model was used, and odds ratios (ORs) for adverse events (AEs) were used to pool effect sizes. Results: We demonstrated that 1-year trastuzumab plus chemotherapy had increased efficacy compared to shorter or longer treatment duration. The OR of cardiac events gradually increased from 6 months to 1 and 2-year trastuzumab arms, relative to chemotherapy only.Compared to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, dual HER2-targeting therapies increased DFS, especially for hormone receptor negative patients. Dual anti-HER2 blockade regimens revealed an increased probability of gastrointestinal reactions. As a second agent, pertuzumab showed significantly higher DFS and OS. Conclusion We conclude that 1-year adjuvant trastuzumab should remain as the standard treatment for HER2-positive EBC patients, as it has greater efficacy and a manageable proportion of AEs. Clinical efficacy can be increased for hormone receptor-negative tumors by including a second HER2-targeted agent to the treatment regimen. For hormone receptorpositive cases with basal disease, it is acceptable to reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity by shortening the duration of trastuzumab.

Biomarkers ; Breast Neoplasms ; Breast ; Drug Therapy ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual ; Pathology ; Prognosis ; United States Food and Drug Administration