1.Antiangiogenic Activity of Acer tegmentosum Maxim Water Extract in Vitro and in Vivo.
Eok Cheon KIM ; So Hun KIM ; Shan Ji PIAO ; Tack Joong KIM ; Kiho BAE ; Han Sung KIM ; Soon Sun HONG ; Byoung Ick LEE ; Moonsuk NAM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(7):979-987
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is critical for tumor growth and metastasis. Notably, tumors themselves can lead to angiogenesis by inducing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is one of the most potent angiogenic factors. Inhibition of angiogenesis is currently perceived as one of the most promising strategies for the blockage of tumor growth. In this study, we investigated the effects of Acer tegmentosum maxim water extract (ATME) on angiogenesis and its underlying signal mechanism. We studied the antiangiogenic activity of ATME by using human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). ATME strongly inhibited VEGF-induced endothelial cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and tube formation, as well as vessel sprouting in a rat aortic ring sprouting assay. Moreover, we found that the p44/42 mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway is involved in the inhibition of angiogenesis by ATME. Moreover, when we performed the in vivo matrigel plug assay, VEGF-induced angiogenesis was potently reduced when compared to that for the control group. Taken together, these results suggest that ATME exhibits potent antiangiogenic activity in vivo and in vitro and that these effects are regulated by the extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) pathway.
Acer/*metabolism
;
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/*pharmacology
;
Animals
;
Cell Line, Tumor
;
Cell Movement/drug effects
;
Cell Proliferation/drug effects
;
Cell Survival
;
Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/*metabolism
;
Hep G2 Cells
;
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells/*drug effects
;
Humans
;
MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred C57BL
;
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1/metabolism
;
Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology
;
Neovascularization, Pathologic/*drug therapy/prevention & control
;
Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III/metabolism
;
Phosphorylation/drug effects
;
Plant Extracts/pharmacology
;
Rats
;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
;
Transcription Factors/metabolism
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors/metabolism
2.Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients during and after Prophylaxis
Moonsuk BAE ; Sang-Oh LEE ; Kyung-Wook JO ; Sehoon CHOI ; Jina LEE ; Eun Jin CHAE ; Kyung-Hyun DO ; Dae-Kee CHOI ; In-Cheol CHOI ; Sang-Bum HONG ; Tae Sun SHIM ; Hyeong Ryul KIM ; Dong Kwan KIM ; Seung-Il PARK
Infection and Chemotherapy 2020;52(4):600-610
Background:
The timeline of infections after lung transplantation has been changed with the introduction of new immunosuppressants and prophylaxis strategies. The study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of infectious diseases after lung transplantation in the current era.
Materials and Methods:
All patients who underwent lung or heart–lung transplantation at our institution between October 29, 2008 and April 3, 2019 were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical records till April 2, 2020.
Results:
In total, 100 consecutive lung transplant recipients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 28 months after lung transplantation. A total of 127 post–lung transplantation bacterial infections occurred. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (25/84, 29.8%) was the most common within 6 months and pneumonia (23/43, 53.5%) was the most common after 6 months. Most episodes (35/40, 87.5%) of respiratory viral infections occurred after 6 months, mainly as upper respiratory infections. The remaining episodes (5/40, 12.5%) mostly manifested as lower respiratory tract infections. Seventy cytomegalovirus infections observed in 43 patients were divided into 23 episodes occurring before and 47 episodes occurring after discontinuing prophylaxis. Of 10 episodes of cytomegalovirus disease, four occurred during prophylaxis and six occurred after prophylaxis.Of 23 episodes of post–lung transplantation fungal infection, 7 were aspergillosis and all occurred after the discontinuation of prophylaxis.
Conclusion
Lung transplant recipients experienced a high burden of infection even after 6 months, especially after the end of the prophylaxis period. Therefore, these patients should be continued to be monitored long-term for infectious disease.
3.Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients during and after Prophylaxis
Moonsuk BAE ; Sang-Oh LEE ; Kyung-Wook JO ; Sehoon CHOI ; Jina LEE ; Eun Jin CHAE ; Kyung-Hyun DO ; Dae-Kee CHOI ; In-Cheol CHOI ; Sang-Bum HONG ; Tae Sun SHIM ; Hyeong Ryul KIM ; Dong Kwan KIM ; Seung-Il PARK
Infection and Chemotherapy 2020;52(4):600-610
Background:
The timeline of infections after lung transplantation has been changed with the introduction of new immunosuppressants and prophylaxis strategies. The study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of infectious diseases after lung transplantation in the current era.
Materials and Methods:
All patients who underwent lung or heart–lung transplantation at our institution between October 29, 2008 and April 3, 2019 were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical records till April 2, 2020.
Results:
In total, 100 consecutive lung transplant recipients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 28 months after lung transplantation. A total of 127 post–lung transplantation bacterial infections occurred. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (25/84, 29.8%) was the most common within 6 months and pneumonia (23/43, 53.5%) was the most common after 6 months. Most episodes (35/40, 87.5%) of respiratory viral infections occurred after 6 months, mainly as upper respiratory infections. The remaining episodes (5/40, 12.5%) mostly manifested as lower respiratory tract infections. Seventy cytomegalovirus infections observed in 43 patients were divided into 23 episodes occurring before and 47 episodes occurring after discontinuing prophylaxis. Of 10 episodes of cytomegalovirus disease, four occurred during prophylaxis and six occurred after prophylaxis.Of 23 episodes of post–lung transplantation fungal infection, 7 were aspergillosis and all occurred after the discontinuation of prophylaxis.
Conclusion
Lung transplant recipients experienced a high burden of infection even after 6 months, especially after the end of the prophylaxis period. Therefore, these patients should be continued to be monitored long-term for infectious disease.