1.Characteristics of Psychiatric Consultation between Presenile and Senile Inpatients.
Ji Woong LEE ; Jin Sook CHEON ; Kang Ryul KIM ; Hyun Seuk KIM ; Byoung Hoon OH
Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine 2013;21(2):114-121
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to know differences of characteristics between presenile and senile patients who were consulted to the department of psychiatry during medical-surgical admission. METHODS: The demographic and clinical data obtained from the medical records of psychiatric consultation in the presenile inpatients with age 50 to 64 years(N=162) and those of the senile inpatients with age over 65 years(N=171) were reviewed and compared. RESULTS: 1) The most common chief complaints for psychiatric consultation in presenile patients were somatic symptoms, anxiety and sleep disturbance in order, while cognitive decline, clouded consciousness and depressed mood were most common in senile patients with statistical significance. 2) The most frequent psychiatric diagnoses after consultation in presenile patients were delirium, mood disorder and substance use disorder in order, while delirium, mood disorder and major neurocognitive disorder were most frequent in senile patients with statistical significance. 3) There were no significant difference in numbers of physical illnesses, while numbers of therapeutic drugs for them were more in senile patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found significant differences between presenile and senile patients on psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses in geropsychiatric consultation. Therefore, more subdivided age-specific approach seems to be needed for the geropsychiatric consultation activities.
Anxiety
;
Consciousness
;
Delirium
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Inpatients*
;
Medical Records
;
Mood Disorders
;
Substance-Related Disorders
2.A Case of CADASIL (Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy) Diagnosed by Skin Biopsy.
Nark Kyoung RHO ; Suk Jin CHOI ; Eil Soo LEE
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2002;40(9):1136-1138
CADASIL(cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy) is a rare genetic disease inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, which is characterized by migraine, strokes, mood disorders, and progressive cognitive disorders. With the aid of skin biopsy and electron microscopic examination, recently we have confirmed a diagnosis of CADASIL in a patient from neurology department. Although CADASIL does not present any cutaneous manifestations, dermatologists need to be aware of this rare neurologic disorder because characteristic electron microscopic findings on a skin biopsy specimen are diagnostic.
Biopsy*
;
CADASIL*
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Microscopy, Electron
;
Migraine Disorders
;
Mood Disorders
;
Nervous System Diseases
;
Neurology
;
Skin*
;
Stroke
3.How Can We Differentiate Schizoaffective Disorder from Mood Disorder with Psychotic Feature?.
Chul Hyun PARK ; Tae Won PARK ; Jong Chul YANG ; Keun Young OH ; Hyeong Tai KIM ; Hong Bae EUN ; Guang Biao HUANG ; Young Chul CHUNG
Korean Journal of Schizophrenia Research 2012;15(1):13-19
Difficulties surrounding the classification of mixed psychotic and mood symptoms continue to plague psychiatric nosology. Since schizoaffective disorder was first defined in the literature, it has raised a considerable controversy regarding its clinical distinction from schizophrenia and mood disorder, especially mood disorder with psychotic feature. Recently, it seems that more people are diagnosed as mood disorder with psychotic feature rather than schizoaffective disorder when they are showing concurrent psychotic and mood symptoms. This may be due to unwillingness to make severe diagnosis at first and aggressive trend to expand the diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder. Over-diagnosis of mood disorder with psychotic feature would expose the patients to unnecessary mood stabilizer. Therefore, it is critical to make exact diagnosis based on current diagnostic criteria and other relevant study findings. We conducted in-depth review into diagnostic criteria of DSM and ICD-10 for schizoaffective disorder and mood disorder with psychotic feature and other related studies comparing clinical features between the two disorders. As a result, important points helpful in differentiating the two disorders are highlighted and future suggestions are described.
Bipolar Disorder
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
International Classification of Diseases
;
Mood Disorders
;
Plague
;
Psychotic Disorders
;
Schizophrenia
4.How Can We Differentiate Schizoaffective Disorder from Mood Disorder with Psychotic Feature?.
Chul Hyun PARK ; Tae Won PARK ; Jong Chul YANG ; Keun Young OH ; Hyeong Tai KIM ; Hong Bae EUN ; Guang Biao HUANG ; Young Chul CHUNG
Korean Journal of Schizophrenia Research 2012;15(1):13-19
Difficulties surrounding the classification of mixed psychotic and mood symptoms continue to plague psychiatric nosology. Since schizoaffective disorder was first defined in the literature, it has raised a considerable controversy regarding its clinical distinction from schizophrenia and mood disorder, especially mood disorder with psychotic feature. Recently, it seems that more people are diagnosed as mood disorder with psychotic feature rather than schizoaffective disorder when they are showing concurrent psychotic and mood symptoms. This may be due to unwillingness to make severe diagnosis at first and aggressive trend to expand the diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder. Over-diagnosis of mood disorder with psychotic feature would expose the patients to unnecessary mood stabilizer. Therefore, it is critical to make exact diagnosis based on current diagnostic criteria and other relevant study findings. We conducted in-depth review into diagnostic criteria of DSM and ICD-10 for schizoaffective disorder and mood disorder with psychotic feature and other related studies comparing clinical features between the two disorders. As a result, important points helpful in differentiating the two disorders are highlighted and future suggestions are described.
Bipolar Disorder
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
International Classification of Diseases
;
Mood Disorders
;
Plague
;
Psychotic Disorders
;
Schizophrenia
5.Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale for DSM-5
Won Hyoung KIM ; Young Eun JUNG ; Daeyoung ROH ; Daeho KIM ; Suk Hoon KANG ; Jeong Ho CHAE ; Joo Eon PARK
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2019;34(32):e219-
BACKGROUND: For diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is one of the most widely used structured diagnostic interviews. METHODS: In this study, we aimed to develop and validate the Korean version of CAPS for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition ([DSM-5] K-CAPS-5). Seventy-one subjects with PTSD, 74 with mood disorder or anxiety disorder, and 99 as healthy controls were enrolled. The Korean version of the structured clinical interview for DSM-5-research version was used to assess the convergent validity of K-CAPS-5. BDI-II, BAI, IES-R, and STAI was used to evaluate the concurrent validity. RESULTS: All subjects completed various psychometric assessments including K-CAPS-5. K-CAPS-5 presented good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.91). K-CAPS-5 showed strong correlations with the structured clinical interview for DSM-5 PTSD (k = 0.893). Among the three subject groups listed above there were significant differences in the K-CAPS-5 total score. The data were best explained by a six-factor model. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated the good reliability and validity of K-CAPS-5 and its suitability for use as a simple but structured instrument for PTSD assessment.
Anxiety Disorders
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
;
Mood Disorders
;
Psychometrics
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
6.Psychiatric Symptoms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Diagnosis and Treatment
Seoyoung YOON ; Dae Hun KANG ; Tae Young CHOI
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2019;26(2):93-103
According to the American College of Rheumatology classification, lupus erythematosus has five psychiatric manifestations, including cognitive dysfunction, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, psychosis, and acute confusional state, which are frequently accompanied by other symptoms. Cognitive dysfunction is the most common psychiatric manifestation in lupus patients with a prevalence rate ranging from 20% to 80%. The expression of psychiatric manifestations has been considered to be associated with disease activity, side effects of medications, and/or psychosocial stresses from the chronicity of lupus, but this has not been fully understood. Appropriate management of psychiatric symptoms is essential as it affects treatment adherence and quality of life. This review aimed to facilitate understanding of psychiatric manifestations of lupus through literature review on the prevalence, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatments of each psychiatric symptom.
Anxiety Disorders
;
Classification
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
;
Mental Disorders
;
Mood Disorders
;
Prevalence
;
Psychotic Disorders
;
Quality of Life
;
Rheumatology
7.Clinical Application of the Korean Personality Rating Scale for Children in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Woon YOON ; Kee Jeong PARK ; Kukju KWEON ; Hyo Won KIM
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2015;26(3):217-225
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the Korean Personality Rating Scale for Children (K-PRC) profile between children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and typically developing children. We also aimed to investigate the association of K-PRC and ADHD symptoms. METHODS: Ninety-nine youth (age 8.3+/-2.4 years, 72 boys) with ADHD and 84 controls (age 9.2+/-2.5 years, 43 boys) were recruited from the Department of Pediatric Psychiatry of the Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital. Diagnoses of ADHD and comorbid psychiatric disorders were confirmed with the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). The parents of the subjects completed the ADHD rating scale, and K-PRC. Independent t-tests, analysis of covariance, partial correlation analyses, and Mc Nemar test were used for analysis. RESULTS: Children and adolescents with ADHD showed higher K-PRC scores in verbal development, physical development, depression, delinquency, hyperactivity, family dysfunction and psychoticism. Delinquency and hyperactivity were significantly correlated with parent-rated ADHD rating scales and ADHD scores on K-SADS-PL. The hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes showed higher scores on hyperactivity and delinquency than the inattentive subtype, and the inattentive subtype showed higher scores on depression and social dysfunction of the K-PRC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that K-PRC could be used to comprehensively evaluate symptoms, combined psychopathologies, developmental delay and family dysfunction of children with ADHD.
Adolescent
;
Child*
;
Chungcheongnam-do
;
Comorbidity
;
Depression
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Mood Disorders
;
Parents
;
Weights and Measures
8.Clinical and Neuropsychological Factors Associated with Treatment Response and Adverse Events of Atomoxetine in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2019;30(2):74-82
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate clinical and neuropsychological factors associated with treatment response and adverse events of atomoxetine in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Korea. METHODS: Children with ADHD were recruited at the Department of Psychiatry of Asan Medical Center from April 2015 to April 2018. Diagnoses of ADHD and comorbid psychiatric disorders were confirmed with the Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. The subjects were subsequently treated with atomoxetine for 12 weeks and illness severity was scored using the ADHD Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale (CGI-S) and/or Improvement scale (CGI-I), at pre- and post-treatment. They also completed the Advanced Test of Attention (ATA), while their caregivers completed the Korean Personality Rating Scale for Children (KPRC) at pre- and post-treatment. Independent t-test, Fisher's exact test, χ2 test, mixed between-within analysis of variance and correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-five children with ADHD (mean age: 7.9±1.4 years, 57 boys) were enrolled, of which, 33 (50.8%) were treatment responders. Scores on the social dysfunction subscale of the KPRC (p=0.021) and commission errors on the visual ATA (p=0.036) at baseline were higher in treatment non-responders than in responders; however, the statistical significances disappeared after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Mood changes were also observed in 13 subjects (20.0%), and three of them discontinued atomoxetine due to this. Additionally, atomoxetine-emergent mood change was observed more frequently in girls (p=0.006), while the intelligence quotient (p=0.040) was higher in those subjects with mood changes than in those without. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that clinical and neuropsychological factors could be associated with treatment response or adverse events of atomoxetine in children with ADHD. Further long-term studies with larger samples are needed.
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
;
Caregivers
;
Child
;
Chungcheongnam-do
;
Diagnosis
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Intelligence
;
Korea
;
Mood Disorders
9.Differences in Psychopathology between Offspring of Parents with Bipolar I Disorder and Those with Bipolar II Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Hyeon Ah LEE ; Ji Sun KIM ; Yeon Jung LEE ; Nam Hun HEO ; Se Hoon SHIM ; Young Joon KWON
Psychiatry Investigation 2018;15(12):1135-1143
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in psychopathology between offspring of parents with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and those with bipolar II disorder (BP-II). METHODS: The sample included 201 offspring between 6 and 17 years of age who had at least one parent with BP-I or BP-II. The offspring were diagnostically evaluated using the Korean Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version. Psychopathology and Clinical characteristics were evaluated, including lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, depression, and childhood trauma. Lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses were also compared between schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 years and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. RESULTS: In lifetime DSM-5 diagnoses, offspring of parents with BP-I had significantly increased risk of developing MDD and BP-I than those with BP-II. Regarding clinical characteristics, ADHD rating scale and childhood trauma scale were significantly higher in offspring of parents with BP-I than that in those with BP-II. CONCLUSION: The present study supports that BP-I may be etiologically distinct from BP-II by a possible genetic liability. Our findings indicate that additional research related to bipolar offspring is needed to enhance understanding of differences between BP-I and BP-II.
Adolescent
;
Cross-Sectional Studies*
;
Depression
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Mood Disorders
;
Parents*
;
Psychopathology*
10.Screening with the Korean Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorders in Adolescents: Korean Validity and Reliability Study.
Se Hoon SHIM ; Jonghun LEE ; Jye Heon SONG ; Beomwoo NAM ; Bo Hyun YOON ; Ha young JIN ; Hyung Mo SUNG ; Jong Hyun JEONG ; Sae Heon JANG ; Duk In JON ; Young Sup WOO ; Won Myong BAHK
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2018;16(3):316-323
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire-Adolescent version (K-MDQ-A) as a screening instrument for bipolar disorders in adolescents. METHODS: One hundred two adolescents with bipolar disorders and their parents were recruited from November 2014 to November 2016 at 7 training hospitals. One hundred six controls were recruited from each middle school in two cities of South Korea. The parent version of the original MDQ-A was translated into Korean. The parents of all participants completed the K-MDQ-A. The diagnoses of bipolar disorders were determined based on the Korean version of K-SADS-PL. The test-retest reliability with a 10-month interval was investigated in 33 bipolar adolescents. RESULTS: K-MDQ-A yielded a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.92 when using a cut-off score of endorsement of 5 items, indicating that symptoms occurred in the same time period and caused moderate or serious problems. The internal consistency of the K-MDQ-A was good. The correlations between each item and the total score ranged from 0.40 to 0.76 and were all statistically significant. Factor analysis revealed 3 factors that explained 61.25% of the total variance. The mean total score was significantly higher in bipolar adolescents (7.29) than in controls (1.32). The Pearson correlation coefficient for the total test-retest score was 0.59 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The K-MDQ-A completed by parents showed the excellent validity and reliability and may be a useful screening tool for adolescents with bipolar disorders attending in- and outpatient psychiatric clinics.
Adolescent*
;
Bipolar Disorder*
;
Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Korea
;
Mass Screening*
;
Mood Disorders*
;
Outpatients
;
Parents
;
Reproducibility of Results*
;
Sensitivity and Specificity