1.Treatment of fresh Monteggia fractures of Bado type I and II in children by closed reduction and ulna intramedullary nail fixation.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016;29(1):64-67
OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of closed reduction and ulna intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of fresh Monteggia fractures of Bado type I and II in children.
METHODSTwenty-three children patients with Monteggia fracture during July 2010 to September 2013 were treated by closed reduction and ulna intramedullary nail fixaion including 18 boys and 5 girls with an average age of 9.3 years old ranging from 6 to 13 years old. Among them,15 cases were Bado type I and 8 cases were Bado type II. There were 9 cases with radial nerve injury. The operation time,the recovery of nerve injury, the fracture healing and the function of elbow were observed and recorded.
RESULTSAll patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months (12 months on average). All patients were obtained bone healing. According to Anderson standard, at the final follow-up, 20 cases got excellent result, 2 cases got good result, and one case got fair result.
CONCLUSIONTreatment of the fresh Monteggia fractures in children by closed reduction and ulna intramedullary nail fixation has advantages of simple operation, less trauma and good results.
Adolescent ; Child ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; methods ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Male ; Monteggia's Fracture ; surgery ; Ulna ; surgery
2.An unusual Monteggia equivalent type 1 lesion: Diaphyseal ulna and radius fractures with a posterior elbow dislocation in a child.
Lassaad HASSINI ; Aymen SAIDI ; Boujemaa TOUATI ; Aymen Ben FRADJ ; Issam ALOUI ; Abderrazek ABID
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2018;21(2):122-124
In this report, we describe an extremely unusual Monteggia equivalent type 1 lesion in a 10-year-old boy following a fall from a height of 1 m. On the plain radiographs, our patient had a particular Monteggia equivalent type 1 injury associating a posterior elbow dislocation with diaphyseal radius and ulna fractures. The patient was treated by closed reduction technique. At six months of follow-up, the fractures were consolidated and the elbow was stable. To our knowledge, only 8 adult cases and one paediatric observation with similar lesions had been reported through medical literature. Therefore, the aim of our case report is to remind this rare entity and also to provide a comprehensive review of the literature related to this uncommon lesion.
Child
;
Closed Fracture Reduction
;
methods
;
Elbow Joint
;
injuries
;
Humans
;
Joint Dislocations
;
surgery
;
Male
;
Monteggia's Fracture
;
surgery
;
Radius Fractures
;
surgery
3.A rare combination injury of type III Monteggia fracture dislocation and ipsilateral epiphyseal fracture of distal radius in children. Is there a probability of missing the Monteggia component?
K-C Kapil MANI ; Arun SIGDEL ; Anuj-Jung RAYAMAJHI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2015;18(1):51-53
Combined type III Monteggia fracture dislocation and ipsilateral distal radial epiphyseal fracture is a very rare injury. Because of difficulty in performing the proper clinical evaluation of a child in an acute injury state, one of the components of this combined injury may be missed. We report a ten-year-old male child with this kind of injury where the Monteggia lesion was initially missed at the emergency department. Later we found the combined epiphyseal fracture of distal radius and Monteggia lesion in the ipsilateral side of the same limb which was managed by closed reduction and K-wire fixation. Bony union as well as wrist and elbow motion was complete 3 months after surgical intervention.
Child
;
Epiphyses
;
diagnostic imaging
;
injuries
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Monteggia's Fracture
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
;
Probability
;
Radius Fractures
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
4.Manual reduction of children's Monteggia fractures associated with anterior interosseous nerve injury.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2014;27(10):862-865
OBJECTIVETo study clinical results of the manual reduction in treatment.
METHODSFrom October 2010 to April 2013,39 children with Monteggia fracture associated with anterior interosseous nerve injury were treated by manual reduction and fixation on buckling rotation backward,including 17 females and 22 males with an average age of 6.3 years old ranging from 3.2 to 11 years old. Among them, 15 cases were on the right side and 24 cases on the left. The course of disease was 40 minutes to 8 days (averaged 1.5 days). There were 7 cases with skateboard injured, 13 cases with stumble injured, 11 cases with falling injured,8 cases with air bed injured. According to Bado classification, 13 cases were type II, 22 cases were type III, 4 cases were type IV.
RESULTSThe distal forefinger showed exercise normally in 34 cases at 3 weeks after treatment, and the patients restored normal activities at 6 weeks after treatment. All patients were follow-up from 54 days to 6 months (averaged 67 days. According to Mayo elbow functional evaluation standard,the scoring result was 19.62±1.35 in activity, 45.00 ± 0.00 in pain, 9.87 ± 0.80 in stability, 25.00±0.00 in strength, 99.49 ±1.92 in total. The outcome of all patients was excellent and good evaluation results.
CONCLUSIONIf the anterior interosseous nerve injury could be identified early and treated timely, patients could gradually restore reasonable function and recover with satisfactory results. Raising understanding of anterior interosseous nerve injury can effectively reduce misdiagnosis.
Arm Bones ; injuries ; innervation ; surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Forearm Injuries ; surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Male ; Median Nerve ; injuries ; Monteggia's Fracture ; surgery
5.Closed manipulative reduction and external fixation with cardboard splint for the treatment of Monteggia fracture.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2021;34(9):870-875
OBJECTIVE:
To explore clinical efficicacy of closed manipulative reduction and external fixation with cardboard splint in treating Monteggia fracture.
METHODS:
Fifty-eight children with Monteggia fracture were underwent closed manipulative reduction and external fixation with cardboard splint from January 2010 to Junuary 2018. Among them, including 37 males and 21 females, aged from 3.5 to 12 years old with an average of (8.48±2.29) years old;the courses of disease ranged from 0.5 hours to 9 days with an average of (4.21±1.46) days. Broberg and Morrey scores before treatment, 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment were used to evaluate clinical effects.
RESULTS:
All children were followed up from 1 to 6 months with an average of (3.35±2.12) months. Broberg and Morrey score (7.24±2.81) before treatment, (32.06 ±8.33) at 1 month after treatment, (73.18±5.56) at 3 months after treatment and (95.87±6.75) at 6 months after treatment; there were statistical differences at each time points after treatment with before treatment (
CONCLUSION
Treatment of Monteggia fractures with closed manipulative reduction and external fixation with cardboard splint could reach integration of motion and quietness, also could remove external fixation at early stage, and get obvious short-term and medium-term therapeutic results.
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
External Fixators
;
Female
;
Fracture Fixation
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Monteggia's Fracture/surgery*
;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
Splints
;
Treatment Outcome
6.Posterior interosseous nerve entrapment after Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children.
Hai LI ; Qi-Xun CAI ; Pin-Quan SHEN ; Ting CHEN ; Zi-Ming ZHANG ; Li ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2013;16(3):131-135
OBJECTIVEAlthough most of nerve injuries associated with Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children are neurapraxias and will recover spontaneously after conservative treatment, surgical exploration of the involved nerve is always required in the cases with the entrapment of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN). However, the necessity and time frame for surgical intervention for specific patterns of nerve dysfunction remains controversial. The aim of the report is to observe and understand the pathology of PIN injury associated with Monteggia fracture-dislocation in children, and to propose the possible indication for the exploration of nerve.
METHODSEight cases, six boys and two girls, with Monteggia fracture-dislocation complicated by PIN injury, managed operatively at the authors?Hospital from 2007 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent the attempted closed reduction before they received exploration of PIN, with open reduction and internal fixation or successful closed reduction.
RESULTSThe PIN was found to be trapped acutely posterior to the radiocapitellar joint in 4 out of 5 Type III Bado's Monteggia fractures. In the remaining cases, since there were longer time intervals from injury to operation, chronic compressive changes and epineural fibrosis of radial nerve were visualized. After a microsurgical neurolysis performed, the complete recovery in the nerve function was obtained in all the cases during the follow-up.
CONCLUSIONThe findings from this study suggest that every case of type III Monteggia fracture-dislocation with decreased or absent function of muscles innervated by PIN and an irreducible radial head in children should be viewed as an indication for immediate surgical exploration of the involved nerve to exclude a potential PIN entrapment.
Female ; Fingers ; innervation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Male ; Monteggia's Fracture ; complications ; Muscle, Skeletal ; innervation ; Nerve Compression Syndromes ; etiology ; surgery ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Thumb ; innervation ; Wrist ; innervation
7.Clinical effect of manual reduction of humeroradial joint in the treatment of type Ⅰ-Ⅲ fresh Monteggia fracture in children.
Yin-Qiang CAO ; Jia-Zhong DENG ; Yuan ZHANG ; Xiao-Wei YUAN ; Tao LIU ; Jun LI ; Xiang LI ; Pan GOU ; Ming LI ; Xing LIU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2020;23(4):233-237
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the efficacy of closed reduction on the humeroradial joint in the treatment of Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ fresh Monteggia fractures in children and investigate the effect of clinical factors, including Bado classification, age and time of treatment on the success rate of closed reduction.
METHODS:
We retrospectively studied the data of children ≤10 years old with fresh Monteggia fractures (injury within two weeks) treated by manual reduction with plaster immobilization from January 2014 to April 2019. All patients were followed up in the outpatient department every two weeks for 4-6 weeks until plaster removal and then 3, 6 and 12 months. Online or telephone interview was provided for some inconvenient patients after 6 months. Mackay criteria were used to evaluate the clinical effect. Radiographic data were collected and reviewed to assess the reduction of the humeroradial joint. Function of the elbow joint and forearm was evaluated and risk factors related to the failure of reduction were assessed. The successful manual reduction was analyzed from three aspects, respectively Bado fracture type (Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ), patient age (<3 year, 3-6 years, >6 years) and time interval from injury to treatment (group A, <1 day; group B, 1-3 days; group C, >3 days).
RESULTS:
Altogether 88 patients were employed in this study, including 58 males (65.9%) and 30 females (34.1%) aged from 1 to 10 years. There were 29 cases (33.0%) of Bado type Ⅰ Monteggia fractures, 16 (18.2%) type Ⅱ and 43 (48.7%) type Ⅲ. Successful manual reduction was achieved in 79 children (89.8%) at the last follow-up. The failed 9 patients received open surgery. Mackay criteria showed 100% good-excellent rate for all the patients. The success rate of manual reduction was 89.7%, 87.5% and 90.7% in Bado type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ cases, respectively, revealing no significant differences among different Bado types (χ = 0.131, p = 0.937). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 13 toddlers (13/13, 100%), 38 preschool children (28/42, 90.5%) and 28 school-age children (28/33, 84.8%), suggesting no significant difference either (χ = 2.375, p = 0.305). However time interval from injury to treatment showed that patients treated within 3 days had a much higher rate of successful manual reduction: 67 cases (67/71, 94.4%) in group A, 10 cases (10/11, 90.9%) in group B, and 2 cases (2/6, 33.3%) in group C (χ = 22.464, p < 0.001). Fisher's test further showed significant differences between groups A and C (p = 0.001) and groups B and C (p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION
Closed reduction is a safe and effective method for treating fresh Monteggia fractures in children. The reduction should be conducted as soon as possible once the diagnosis has been made.
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Closed Fracture Reduction
;
methods
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Male
;
Monteggia's Fracture
;
classification
;
surgery
;
therapy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
8.Hinged external fixator in elbow trauma management.
Xie-Yuan JIANG ; Li-Dan ZHANG ; Xing-Hua LIU ; Lei HUANG ; Jie WEI ; Man-Yi WANG ; Guo-Wei RONG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2004;42(12):737-740
OBJECTIVETo introduce a new way of treatment for elbow stiffness and instability.
METHODS30 cases of elbow trauma were treated with mobile hinged Orthofix elbow fixator, 26 of them were followed up. There are 15 male patients and 11 female patients. The average age is 32.6 years old. The 26 injured elbows involved 12 cases on left side and 14 cases on right side; Sixteen cases on the dominant side and 10 cases on the non-dominant side. Sixteen cases had elbow stiffness, 5 cases had acute radial head fracture and posterior dislocation of the elbow, 3 of cases had Monteggia's fracture dislocation, and 2 cases had neglected posterior dislocation of the elbow.
RESULTSThe average follow up time was 6 months (3 - 12 month). The mean time of fixation with fixator was 8.5 weeks (6 - 11 weeks). The mean ROM of the 16 cases of elbow stiffness was (37.5 +/- 0.8) degrees before operation, and (96.5 +/- 0.6) degrees operation, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). The mean Mayo elbow score was (69.5 +/- 1.7) before operation, compared with (82.8 +/- 1.6) after operation, with a significant difference (< 0.05). For the other 10 cases (5 cases with acute radial head fracture and posterior dislocation of the elbow, 3 cases with Monteggia's fracture dislocation, 2 cases with neglected posterior dislocation of the elbow), the average ROM of the elbow flexion-extension was 95 degrees (65 degrees - 150 degrees ); The average range of flexion was 117 degrees; the average loss of extension was 22 degrees; the average pronation was 76 degrees (20 degrees - 90 degrees ), the average supination was 75 degrees (15 degrees - 90 degrees ). Nine of the cases achieved anatomic reduction and proved by X-ray. The mean Mayo elbow score was 84 (49 - 96). Three cases were rated excellent, 4 good, 2 fair and 1 poor. The rate of excellent and good was 70% (7/10). Nine cases had no pain or mild pain, and did not need analgesic. Eight cases returned to their former work, 5 of the cases had complications.
CONCLUSIONSThe mobile hinged elbow external fixator have following advantages: (1) distraction of the articular space and enhance fracture healing; (2) allow early movement of the elbow during healing; (3) provide stable environment for the healing after arthrolysis and reconstruction. Mobile hinged elbow external fixator can achieve successful result in the treatment of elbow stiffness or unstable fracture dislocation of elbow.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Elbow Joint ; injuries ; surgery ; External Fixators ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation ; methods ; Humans ; Joint Dislocations ; complications ; surgery ; Joint Instability ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monteggia's Fracture ; complications ; surgery ; Radius Fractures ; complications ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome
10.Posterior monteggia fracture-dislocations of proximal ulna.
Ting LI ; Xie-Yuan JIANG ; Jian ZHANG ; Qi-Yong CAO ; Li-Dan ZHANG ; Xing-Hua LIU ; Mao-Qi GONG ; Xing TENG ; Man-Yi WANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2009;47(12):899-902
OBJECTIVESTo discuss the diagnosis and differential diagnosis, and to establish an effective protocol to treat the posterior Monteggia fracture-dislocations of proximal ulna in adult according to our experience.
METHODSBetween April 2004 and December 2007, 16 patients with posterior Monteggia fracture-dislocations were treated surgically, 13 were followed up at a mean of 28 months (range, 12 - 58 months). All the operations were through the posterior midline approach. The fractures of radial head and coronoid process were reduced and fixed, if possible. The proximal ulna fractures were fixed with a single plate in 7 cases, plate combined with K-wires in 2, plate combined with K-wires tension band in 3, and K-wires tension band combined with screws in 1.
RESULTSNo elbow was painful or unstable at the last follow up examination. They had an average of 100 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 145 degrees ) of flexion-extension of elbow. The average motion of forearm rotation was 119 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 170 degrees ). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 93.1 points (67 - 100 points), excellent and good results were achieved in 92.3%. The mean system of Broberg and Morrey score was 88.8 points (53 - 100 points), excellent and good results were achieved in 76.9%.
CONCLUSIONSAttention should be paid to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the posterior Monteggia fracture-dislocation of proximal ulna. Anatomically reduction and stable fixation of proximal ulna is the keystone for the surgical treatment.
Adult ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Bone Wires ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Elbow Joint ; surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Monteggia's Fracture ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome