Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were approved for the prevention of cardiogenic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in recent years. However, the dosage of DOAC has to be reduced in patients with bleeding tendencies where the risk of hemorrhage is high, and dose reduction strategies differ depending on the type of DOAC. Therefore, we examined the dosage regimens of 4 DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban). Among 129 patients treated with DOACs, 85 received the standard dosage and 44 received non-standard dosage regimens. Among the non-standard dosage patients, 6 were taking a high dose (dose reduction was desirable) and 38 patients were taking a low dose (low dose is usually desirable). The low dosage group were significantly older and had a significantly lower CHADS2 score than that of the high dosage group. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 2 patients in the standard dosage group and in 3 patients in the low dosage group. Also, a thrombotic event occurred in only 1 patient in the standard dosage group. About 30% of the patients were on low dosage versus standard dosage. In practice, attending physicians tend to reduce the dose to avoid a hemorrhagic event particularly in elderly persons. However, a hemorrhagic event also occurred with low dosage in this survey. The validity and safety of dosages outside the limits of standard dosage have not been reported even though this dosage method is commonly used in clinical practice. Thus, more data should be accumulated from a large-scale cohort study to clarify this.

BACKGROUND: In health examinations for local inhabitants in cadmium-polluted areas, only healthy people are investigated, suggesting that patients with severe cadmium nephropathy or itai-itai disease may be overlooked. Therefore, we performed hospital-based screening to detect patients with cadmium nephropathy in two core medical institutes in cadmium-polluted areas in Akita prefecture, Japan. METHODS: Subjects for this screening were selected from patients aged 60 years or older with elevated serum creatinine levels and no definite renal diseases. We enrolled 35 subjects from a hospital in Odate city and 22 from a clinic in Kosaka town. Urinary ß-microglobulin and blood and urinary cadmium levels were measured. RESULTS: The criteria for renal tubular dysfunction and the over-accumulation of cadmium were set as a urinary ß-microglobulin level higher than 10,000 μg/g cr. and a blood cadmium level higher than 6 μg/L or urinary cadmium level higher than 10 μg/g cr., respectively. Subjects who fulfilled both criteria were diagnosed with cadmium nephropathy. Six out of 57 patients (10.5% of all subjects) had cadmium nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: This hospital-based screening is a very effective strategy for detecting patients with cadmium nephropathy in cadmium-polluted areas, playing a complementary role in health examinations for local inhabitants. REGISTRATION NUMBER No. 6, date of registration: 6 June, 2010 (Akita Rosai Hospital), and No. 1117, date of registration: 26 December, 2013 (Akita University).
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cadmium ; adverse effects ; urine ; Cadmium Poisoning ; blood ; complications ; urine ; Creatinine ; urine ; Environmental Exposure ; adverse effects ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental Pollutants ; adverse effects ; urine ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Japan ; Kidney Diseases ; chemically induced ; urine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sex Distribution