1.Prevalence of Neck Pain among Athletes: A Systematic Review
Pardis NOORMOHAMMADPOUR ; Farbod FARAHBAKHSH ; Farzin FARAHBAKHSH ; Mohsen ROSTAMI ; Ramin KORDI
Asian Spine Journal 2018;12(6):1146-1153
Many studies have investigated the prevalence of neck pain (NP) and its risk factors in the general population. However, the prevalence of NP among athletes has not yet been systematically investigated. We aimed to systematically review the prevalence of NP in athletes. A comprehensive search was conducted in September 2015 using PubMed, Ovid SP Medline, ISI, and Google Scholar. We included studies in English that reported the prevalence of NP in an athletic population during a defined period of time. We assessed the risk of bias in studies due to various definitions of NP, response rates, and reliability of the study instruments. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies' quality and performed data extraction. Of 1,675 titles identified, eight articles were assessed for risk of bias, and six with low or moderate risk were included. NP was shown to be prevalent in athletes, with a 1-week prevalence ranging from 8% to 45%, a 1-year prevalence ranging from 38% to 73%, and a lifetime prevalence of about 48%. The prevalence of NP in athletes is high. More studies regarding the prevalence and risk factors of NP may be useful for planning educational programs and developing appropriate rehabilitation protocols and preventive guidelines. Researchers are encouraged to perform epidemiologic studies in athletes with a low risk of bias.
Athletes
;
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Epidemiologic Studies
;
Humans
;
Neck Pain
;
Neck
;
Prevalence
;
Rehabilitation
;
Risk Factors
;
Sports
2.Brainstem Correlates of Comodulation Masking Release for Speech in Normal Hearing Adults
Soheila ROSTAMI ; Abdollah MOOSSAVI ; Mohsen AHADI ; Shohreh JALAEI
Journal of Audiology & Otology 2018;22(3):128-133
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Weak signals embedded in fluctuating masker can be perceived more efficiently than similar signals embedded in unmodulated masker. This release from masking is known as comodulation masking release (CMR). In this paper, we investigate, neural correlates of CMR in the human auditory brainstem. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 26 normal hearing subjects aged 18-30 years participated in this study. First, the impact of CMR was quantified by a behavioral experiment. After that, the brainstem correlates of CMR was investigated by the auditory brainstem response to complex sounds (cABR) in comodulated (CM) and unmodulated (UM) masking conditions. RESULTS: The auditory brainstem responses are less susceptible to degradation in response to the speech syllable /da/ in the CM noise masker in comparison with the UM noise masker. In the CM noise masker, frequency-following response (FFR) and fundamental frequency (F0) were correlated with better behavioral CMR. Furthermore, the subcortical response timing of subjects with higher CMR was less affected by the CM noise masker, having higher stimulus-to-noise response correlations over the FFR range. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study revealed a significant link between brainstem auditory processes and CMR. The findings of the present study show that cABR provides objective information about the neural correlates of CMR for speech stimulus.
Adult
;
Brain Stem
;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
;
Hearing
;
Humans
;
Masks
;
Noise
3.Syphacia obvelata: A New Hope to Induction of Intestinal Immunological Tolerance in C57BL/6 Mice.
Niloofar TAGHIPOUR ; Nariman MOSAFFA ; Mohammad ROSTAMI-NEJAD ; Mohamad Mohsen HOMAYONI ; Esmaeil MORTAZ ; Hamid Asadzadeh AGHDAEI ; Mohammad Reza ZALI
The Korean Journal of Parasitology 2017;55(4):439-444
The ability of nematodes to manipulate the immune system of their host towards a Th2 and T regulatory responses has been proposed to suppress the inflammatory response. Clinical trials have proposed a useful effect of helminth infections on improvement of inflammatory disorders. In this study, we investigated the immunomodulatory effect of Syphacia obvelata infection to induce intestinal tolerance in C57BL/6 mice. Mice were infected through the cagemates with self-infected BALB/c mice. Four weeks post-infection, expression levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-10 were assessed in the supernatant of mesenteric lymph node (MLN) culture. Foxp3⁺Treg were measured in MLN cells by flow cytometry. In the S. obvelata-infected group, the percentage of Tregs (5.2±0.4) was significantly higher than the control (3.6±0.5) (P<0.05). The levels of IL-10 (55.3±2.2 vs 35.2±3.2), IL-17 (52.9±3.8 vs 41±1.8), IFN-γ (44.8±4.8 vs 22.3±2.3) and TNF-α (71.1±5.8 vs 60.1±3.3) were significantly increased in infected mice compared to the control group (P<0.05). The above results showed the potential effects of S. obvelata to induce intestinal tolerance. Therefore, it seems that S. obvelata may increase the immunological suppressive function in the intestinal tract.
Animals
;
Flow Cytometry
;
Helminths
;
Hope*
;
Immune System
;
Interleukin-10
;
Interleukin-17
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Mice*
;
Oxyuroidea*
4.Causes of Visual Impairment among Patients Referred to a Visual Rehabilitation Clinic in Iran.
Alireza RAMEZANI ; Maasome PARDIS ; Nasrin RAFATI ; Mohsen KAZEMI-MOGHADDAM ; Marzieh KATIBEH ; Pooya ROSTAMI ; Mohammad Hossein DEHGHAN ; Mohammad Ali JAVADI ; Zahra RABBANIKHAH
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2012;26(2):80-83
PURPOSE: Epidemiologic evaluation and investigating the causes of visual impairment in any society is a matter of concern and has a direct effect on the country's health care planning. In this study we describe causes of low vision and blindness in Iranian patients referred to rehabilitation clinics for taking vision aids. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, visual acuity was classified based on best-corrected visual acuity in the better eye according to the World Health Organization definition (blindness, visual acuity [VA] < 20 / 400; severe visual impairment, VA < 20 / 200-20 / 400; mild to moderate visual impairment, VA < 20 / 60-20 / 200). The causes of blindness and low vision were determined using the 10th version of International Classification of Diseases based on the main cause in both eyes. To describe data, we used mean +/- SD and frequency. RESULTS: The study included 432 patients, 65% male, with a mean age of 43.6 +/- 25.5 years (range, 3 to 92 years). Mild to moderate visual impairment, severe visual impairment and blindness were present in 122 (28.8%), 196 (46.4%) and 105 (24.8%) of the patients, respectively. The main causes of visual impairment were retinal and choroidal diseases (74.5%), optic nerve and optic tract diseases (9.8%), vitreous and globe disorders (5.3%), congenital cataract (3.1%), and glaucoma (2.6%). The distribution pattern of the causes was similar in all age subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Diseases of the retina and choroid are the main cause of visual impairment among patients referred to an academic visual rehabilitation clinic in Iran.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Audiovisual Aids
;
Blindness/*epidemiology/rehabilitation
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Choroid Diseases/*epidemiology/rehabilitation
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Iran/epidemiology
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Optic Nerve Diseases/epidemiology/rehabilitation
;
Referral and Consultation/*statistics & numerical data
;
Rehabilitation Centers/*statistics & numerical data
;
Retinal Diseases/*epidemiology/rehabilitation
;
Vision, Low/*epidemiology/rehabilitation
;
Young Adult
5.The Impact of Rigid Cervical Collars on Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Masoud KHADIVI ; Navid MOGHADAM ; Sajjad SAGHEBDOUST ; Furqan Mohammed Yaseen KHAN ; Mohammad ESLAMIAN ; Morteza Faghih JOUIBARI ; Milad SHAFIZADEH ; Mersad MOOSAVI ; Mohammad ZAREI ; Ramin KORDI ; Mohsen ROSTAMI
Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(2):322-329
Methods:
Patients who underwent PCLF and received postoperative cervical collars from 2018 to 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Their data were compared with an age- and sex-matched group of subjects who did not receive collars after PCLF during the same period. Pain intensity (using the Visual Analog Scale), Neck Disability Index, and quality of life (using 36-item Short Form Health Survey) of the patients were compared at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
Results:
A total of 36 patients who received cervical collars after surgery and 40 controls were included. At baseline and 1-month follow-up, there were no differences in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life between the groups. However, at 3 months postoperatively, the quality of life of the subjects with no orthosis was higher than those who received cervical collars (p =0.01). At 6- and 12-month follow-up, there were no differences between the groups in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life.
Conclusions
No difference in the pain intensity and functional status of patients who used cervical collars and controls was shown in our study. Patients who did not wear cervical collars had a higher quality of life during the 3-month postoperative evaluation. Future prospective, well-controlled studies with longer follow-ups are needed to further investigate the effects of cervical orthosis on the clinical outcome of patients after PCLF.