1.Use of percussion as a screening tool in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures.
Mohan TIRU ; S H GOH ; B Y LOW
Singapore medical journal 2002;43(9):467-469
Traumatic hip pain is a common clinical problem in the emergency department. There is significant morbidity in discharging a patient with an undiagnosed undisplaced hip fracture. The auscultatory percussion technique is a useful method to risk stratify patients who present with traumatic hip pain and with normal radiographs. We sought to study the sensitivity and specificity of the auscultatory percussion technique in a prospective study.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Auscultation
;
methods
;
Confidence Intervals
;
Female
;
Hip Fractures
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Humans
;
Injury Severity Score
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Percussion
;
methods
;
Physical Examination
;
methods
;
Predictive Value of Tests
;
Prospective Studies
;
Reference Values
;
Sampling Studies
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Singapore
;
Single-Blind Method
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
methods
2.An armed assailant in our hospital: Are we prepared?
Sohil POTHIAWALA ; Rabind CHARLES ; Wai Kein CHOW ; Kheng Wee ANG ; Karen Hsien Ling TAN ; Mohan TIRU
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2021;50(9):712-716
While armed assailant attacks are rare in the hospital setting, they pose a potential risk to healthcare staff, patients, visitors and the infrastructure. Singapore hospitals have well-developed disaster plans to respond to a mass casualty incident occurring outside the hospital. However, lack of an armed assailant incident response plan can significantly reduce the hospital's ability to appropriately respond to such an incident. The authors describe various strategies that can be adopted in the development of an armed assailant incident response plan. Regular staff training will increase staff resilience and capability to respond to a potential threat in the future. The aim of this article is to highlight the need for the emergency preparedness units of all hospitals to work together with various stakeholders to develop an armed assailant incident response plan. This will be of great benefit for keeping healthcare facilities safe, both for staff as well as for the community.
Delivery of Health Care
;
Disaster Planning
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Hospitals
;
Humans
;
Singapore
3.Role of peak current in conversion of patients with ventricular fibrillation.
Venkataraman ANANTHARAMAN ; Paul Weng WAN ; Seow Yian TAY ; Peter George MANNING ; Swee Han LIM ; Siang Jin Terrance CHUA ; Tiru MOHAN ; Antony Charles RABIND ; Sudarshan VIDYA ; Ying HAO
Singapore medical journal 2017;58(7):432-437
INTRODUCTIONPeak currents are the final arbiter of defibrillation in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, biphasic defibrillators continue to use energy in joules for electrical conversion in hopes that their impedance compensation properties will address transthoracic impedance (TTI), which must be overcome when a fixed amount of energy is delivered. However, optimal peak currents for conversion of VF remain unclear. We aimed to determine the role of peak current and optimal peak levels for conversion in collapsed VF patients.
METHODSAdult, non-pregnant patients presenting with non-traumatic VF were included in the study. All defibrillations that occurred were included. Impedance values during defibrillation were used to calculate peak current values. The endpoint was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
RESULTSOf the 197 patients analysed, 105 had ROSC. Characteristics of patients with and without ROSC were comparable. Short duration of collapse < 10 minutes correlated positively with ROSC. Generally, patients with average or high TTI converted at lower peak currents. 25% of patients with high TTI converted at 13.3 ± 2.3 A, 22.7% with average TTI at 18.2 ± 2.5 A and 18.6% with low TTI at 27.0 ± 4.7 A (p = 0.729). Highest peak current conversions were at < 15 A and 15-20 A. Of the 44 patients who achieved first-shock ROSC, 33 (75.0%) received < 20 A peak current vs. > 20 A for the remaining 11 (25%) patients (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONFor best effect, priming biphasic defibrillators to deliver specific peak currents should be considered.