Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a significant global health issue, affecting over 30% of the population worldwide due to the rising prevalence of metabolic risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. This spectrum of liver disease ranges from isolated steatosis to more severe forms such as steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Recent studies highlight the role of gut microbiota in MASLD pathogenesis, showing that dysbiosis significantly impacts metabolic health and the progression of liver disease. This review critically evaluates current microbiome-centered therapies in MASLD management, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and emerging therapies such as engineered bacteria and bacteriophage therapy. We explore the scientific rationale, clinical evidence, and potential mechanisms by which these interventions influence MASLD. The gut-liver axis is crucial in MASLD, with notable changes in microbiome composition linked to disease progression. For instance, specific microbial profiles and reduced alpha diversity are associated with MASLD severity. Therapeutic strategies targeting the microbiome could modulate disease progression by improving gut permeability, reducing endotoxin-producing bacteria, and altering bile acid metabolism. Although promising, these therapies require further research to fully understand their mechanisms and optimize their efficacy. This review integrates findings from clinical trials and experimental studies, providing a comprehensive overview of microbiome-centered therapies’ potential in managing MASLD. Future research should focus on personalized strategies, utilizing microbiome features, blood metabolites, and customized dietary interventions to enhance the effectiveness of these therapies.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a significant global health issue, affecting over 30% of the population worldwide due to the rising prevalence of metabolic risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. This spectrum of liver disease ranges from isolated steatosis to more severe forms such as steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Recent studies highlight the role of gut microbiota in MASLD pathogenesis, showing that dysbiosis significantly impacts metabolic health and the progression of liver disease. This review critically evaluates current microbiome-centered therapies in MASLD management, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and emerging therapies such as engineered bacteria and bacteriophage therapy. We explore the scientific rationale, clinical evidence, and potential mechanisms by which these interventions influence MASLD. The gut-liver axis is crucial in MASLD, with notable changes in microbiome composition linked to disease progression. For instance, specific microbial profiles and reduced alpha diversity are associated with MASLD severity. Therapeutic strategies targeting the microbiome could modulate disease progression by improving gut permeability, reducing endotoxin-producing bacteria, and altering bile acid metabolism. Although promising, these therapies require further research to fully understand their mechanisms and optimize their efficacy. This review integrates findings from clinical trials and experimental studies, providing a comprehensive overview of microbiome-centered therapies’ potential in managing MASLD. Future research should focus on personalized strategies, utilizing microbiome features, blood metabolites, and customized dietary interventions to enhance the effectiveness of these therapies.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a significant global health issue, affecting over 30% of the population worldwide due to the rising prevalence of metabolic risk factors such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. This spectrum of liver disease ranges from isolated steatosis to more severe forms such as steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Recent studies highlight the role of gut microbiota in MASLD pathogenesis, showing that dysbiosis significantly impacts metabolic health and the progression of liver disease. This review critically evaluates current microbiome-centered therapies in MASLD management, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and emerging therapies such as engineered bacteria and bacteriophage therapy. We explore the scientific rationale, clinical evidence, and potential mechanisms by which these interventions influence MASLD. The gut-liver axis is crucial in MASLD, with notable changes in microbiome composition linked to disease progression. For instance, specific microbial profiles and reduced alpha diversity are associated with MASLD severity. Therapeutic strategies targeting the microbiome could modulate disease progression by improving gut permeability, reducing endotoxin-producing bacteria, and altering bile acid metabolism. Although promising, these therapies require further research to fully understand their mechanisms and optimize their efficacy. This review integrates findings from clinical trials and experimental studies, providing a comprehensive overview of microbiome-centered therapies’ potential in managing MASLD. Future research should focus on personalized strategies, utilizing microbiome features, blood metabolites, and customized dietary interventions to enhance the effectiveness of these therapies.

Amidst the tangled web of neurons, antioxidants stand as silent sentinels, shielding the delicate threads from the raging storm of oxidative stress in the realm of neurological affliction. Herein, we showcased an innovative design strategy to develop a novel powerful antioxidant small molecule (AOX), designed with the synergistic integration of EGCG (epigallocatechin gallate), gallic acid, and coupled with the metal-chelating capabilities of 8-hydroxy quinoline functional moieties that exhibit multifunctional activity in combating oxidative stress via activating the anti-oxidative, anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory activity, showcasing the potential for a transformative impact in neuroprotection from oxidative insults. Our work addresses oxidative stress in neuronal systems by providing a thorough examination of oxidative stress caused by hydrogen peroxide in PC12 cell line-derived neurons by shedding light on the antioxidative mechanisms orchestrated by our novel small molecule. Particularly our designed molecule (AOX) provides neuroprotection by mitigating mitochondrial impairment and activating the Nrf2/ARE (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element) pathway and it also demonstrates remarkable resilience against neuroinflammation, as evidenced by minimal alterations in neuroinflammatory markers such as GFAP, IBA1, and S100β in a transient bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (tBCCAO) ischemic stroke model.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present unique challenges. The aim of this study was to compare both systemic and joint-related postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary TSA with RA versus those with primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Using the TriNetX database, Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: RA and OA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative systemic complications within 90 days following primary TSA and joint-related complications within 5 years following anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were compared. Results: After propensity score matching, the RA and OA cohorts each consisted of 8,523 patients. Within 90 days postoperation, RA patients had a significantly higher risk of total complications, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, mortality, and readmission compared to the OA cohort. RA patients had a significantly greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection and prosthetic dislocation within 5 years following aTSA and RSA, and a greater risk of scapular fractures following RSA. Among RA patients, RSA had a significantly higher risk of prosthetic dislocation, scapular fractures, and revision compared to aTSA. Conclusions Following TSA, RA patients should be considered at higher risk of systemic and joint-related complications compared to patients with primary OA. Knowledge of the risk profile of RA patients undergoing TSA is essential for appropriate patient counseling and education.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present unique challenges. The aim of this study was to compare both systemic and joint-related postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary TSA with RA versus those with primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Using the TriNetX database, Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: RA and OA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative systemic complications within 90 days following primary TSA and joint-related complications within 5 years following anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were compared. Results: After propensity score matching, the RA and OA cohorts each consisted of 8,523 patients. Within 90 days postoperation, RA patients had a significantly higher risk of total complications, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, mortality, and readmission compared to the OA cohort. RA patients had a significantly greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection and prosthetic dislocation within 5 years following aTSA and RSA, and a greater risk of scapular fractures following RSA. Among RA patients, RSA had a significantly higher risk of prosthetic dislocation, scapular fractures, and revision compared to aTSA. Conclusions Following TSA, RA patients should be considered at higher risk of systemic and joint-related complications compared to patients with primary OA. Knowledge of the risk profile of RA patients undergoing TSA is essential for appropriate patient counseling and education.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present unique challenges. The aim of this study was to compare both systemic and joint-related postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary TSA with RA versus those with primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Using the TriNetX database, Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: RA and OA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative systemic complications within 90 days following primary TSA and joint-related complications within 5 years following anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were compared. Results: After propensity score matching, the RA and OA cohorts each consisted of 8,523 patients. Within 90 days postoperation, RA patients had a significantly higher risk of total complications, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, mortality, and readmission compared to the OA cohort. RA patients had a significantly greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection and prosthetic dislocation within 5 years following aTSA and RSA, and a greater risk of scapular fractures following RSA. Among RA patients, RSA had a significantly higher risk of prosthetic dislocation, scapular fractures, and revision compared to aTSA. Conclusions Following TSA, RA patients should be considered at higher risk of systemic and joint-related complications compared to patients with primary OA. Knowledge of the risk profile of RA patients undergoing TSA is essential for appropriate patient counseling and education.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can present unique challenges. The aim of this study was to compare both systemic and joint-related postoperative complications in patients undergoing primary TSA with RA versus those with primary osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Using the TriNetX database, Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify patients who underwent primary TSA. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: RA and OA. After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative systemic complications within 90 days following primary TSA and joint-related complications within 5 years following anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were compared. Results: After propensity score matching, the RA and OA cohorts each consisted of 8,523 patients. Within 90 days postoperation, RA patients had a significantly higher risk of total complications, deep surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, urinary tract infection, mortality, and readmission compared to the OA cohort. RA patients had a significantly greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection and prosthetic dislocation within 5 years following aTSA and RSA, and a greater risk of scapular fractures following RSA. Among RA patients, RSA had a significantly higher risk of prosthetic dislocation, scapular fractures, and revision compared to aTSA. Conclusions Following TSA, RA patients should be considered at higher risk of systemic and joint-related complications compared to patients with primary OA. Knowledge of the risk profile of RA patients undergoing TSA is essential for appropriate patient counseling and education.Level of evidence: III.

Objective: Human exposure to multiple xenobiotics, over various developmental windows, results in adverse health effects arising from these concomitant exposures. Humans are widely exposed to bisphenol A, and acetaminophen is the most commonly used over-the-counter drug worldwide. Bisphenol A is a well-recognized male reproductive toxicant, and increasing evidence suggests that acetaminophen is also detrimental to the male reproductive system. The recent recognition of male reproductive system dysfunction in conditions of suboptimal reproductive outcomes makes it crucial to investigate the contributions of toxicant exposures to infertility and sub-fertility. We aimed to identify toxicity in the male reproductive system at the mitochondrial level in response to co-exposure to bisphenol A and acetaminophen, and we investigated whether melatonin ameliorated this toxicity. Methods: Male Wistar rats were divided into six groups (n=10 each): a control group and groups that received melatonin, bisphenol A, acetaminophen, bisphenol A and acetaminophen, and bisphenol A and acetaminophen with melatonin treatment. Results: Significantly higher lipid peroxidation was observed in the testicular mitochondria and sperm in the treatment groups than in the control group. Levels of glutathione and the activities of catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and manganese superoxide dismutase decreased significantly in response to the toxicant treatments. Likewise, the toxicant treatments significantly decreased the sperm count and motility, while significantly increasing sperm mortality. Melatonin mitigated the adverse effects of bisphenol A and acetaminophen. Conclusion Co-exposure to bisphenol A and acetaminophen elevated oxidative stress in the testicular mitochondria, and this effect was alleviated by melatonin.

Over the past few decades, complementary and alternative treatments have become increasingly popular worldwide. The purported therapeutic characteristics of natural products have come under increased scrutiny both in vitro and in vivo as part of efforts to legitimize their usage. One such product is tea tree oil (TTO), a volatile essential oil primarily obtained from the native Australian plant, Melaleuca alternifolia, which has diverse traditional and industrial applications such as topical preparations for the treatment of skin infections. Its anti-inflammatory-linked immunomodulatory actions have also been reported. This systematic review focuses on the anti-inflammatory effects of TTO and its main components that have shown strong immunomodulatory potential. An extensive literature search was performed electronically for data curation on worldwide accepted scientific databases, such as Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and esteemed publishers such as Elsevier, Springer, Frontiers, and Taylor & Francis. Considering that the majority of pharmacological studies were conducted on crude oils only, the extracted data were critically analyzed to gain further insight into the prospects of TTO being used as a neuroprotective agent by drug formulation or dietary supplement. In addition, the active constituents contributing to the activity of TTO have not been well justified, and the core mechanisms need to be unveiled especially for anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects leading to neuroprotection. Therefore, this review attempts to correlate the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity of TTO with its neuroprotective mechanisms.
Tea Tree Oil/therapeutic use* ; Melaleuca ; Neuroprotection ; Drug Repositioning ; Neuroinflammatory Diseases ; Australia ; Oils, Volatile ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology*