Background: According to previous research, 20% of infants experience prolonged postsurgical pain 6–12 months after major surgery, which is linked to functional impairment and a lower quality of life. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether the analgesic effect of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is superior to that of caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) in pediatric patients undergoing hip or proximal femoral surgeries. Methods: Seventy-six children ranging in age from 1 to 7 years scheduled for hip or proximal femur surgery were randomly assigned to receive either a unilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB or CEA with bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg. The primary outcome was the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale 2 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were pain scores every 15 min for the first hour and then at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; the block failure rate; time to perform a successful block; and time to first rescue analgesia. Results: The FLACC score 2 h post¬operatively was not superior in the ESPB group compared to the CEA group; indeed, it was significantly higher in the ESPB group at 15 and 30 min post-operation (P = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). Additionally, the time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged in the CEA group (P < 0.001). The time to perform a successful block was comparable between the groups. Conclusions The analgesic effect of the ESPB was not superior to that of CEA in pediatric patients undergoing hip and proximal femur surgery.

PURPOSE: Revolutions have occurred over the last 3 decades in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. Most advances were in rectal cancer surgery, especially after the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald. However, no parallel advances regarding colon cancer surgeries have occurred. In 2009, Hohenberger introduced a new concept trying to translate the survival advantages of TME to patients with colon cancer. This relatively new concept of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in the management of patients with colon cancer represents an evolution in operative technique. We performed a comparative study between CME with CVL and conventional surgery for patients with colon cancer at Italian and Egyptian cancer centers, considering surgical quality and clinical outcome. METHODS: Seventy-nine Egyptian patients underwent conventional surgery (non-CME group) while 52 Italian patients underwent CME with sharp dissection between the embryological planes and CVL of the supplying vessels (CME group). RESULTS: Significantly better results were observed in terms of lymph node yield (CME group: 22.5 vs. non-CME group: 12; P < 0.0001) and lymph node ratio (CME group: 0.03 vs. non-CME group: 0.22; P < 0.0001). Regarding surgical morbidity, no significant difference was noted (CME group: 2 vs. non-CME group: 5; P < 0.702). CONCLUSION: CME appears to be a safe procedure when performed by experienced hands through proper embryological planes. It also provides a superior specimen, with a higher lymph node yield, which consequently affects the lymph node ratio. Eventually, CME with CVL should be increasingly adopted and studied more deeply.
Colon* ; Colonic Neoplasms* ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Hand ; Humans ; Ligation* ; Lymph Nodes ; Mesocolon ; Rectal Neoplasms