Anomalous origin of the coronary artery is rare. Various complications have been reported in patients with this anomaly undergoing heart valve surgery. We describe a case of aortic valve stenosis combined with an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery. An 84-year-old man with exertional dyspnea was referred for surgical treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis. Coronary angiography and computed tomography of the coronary artery revealed a coronary arterial anomaly : the left anterior descending coronary artery originated as a branch of the right coronary artery, and the left circumflex artery separately originated from the right coronary sinus and extended behind the aortic annulus. To prevent injury to the anomalous circumflex artery during surgery, the artery was separated from the fatty tissue around the aortic annulus and dissected free from the aortic wall before the performance of transverse aortotomy. The coronary artery exhibited a single orifice that was significantly enlarged. Whether antegrade infusion of the cardioplegic solution could be achieved was difficult to determine. To perform the retrograde infusion, the catheter tip was inserted directly into the coronary sinus from the epicardium because the orifice in the right atrium was lattice-like. Aortic valve replacement was successfully performed with supra-annular prosthesis insertion using a 19-mm Mosaic porcine valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The postoperative course was uneventful. When aortic valve replacement is performed for patients with an anomalous coronary artery, careful performance of operative procedures and postoperative observation are considered important for the prevention of specific perioperative complications, such as intraoperative coronary injury or postoperative myocardial ischemic events in patients with an anomalous left circumflex artery.

We report a 25-year-old man with ventricular septal perforation due to blunt chest trauma. He was transferred by ambulance to our hospital following a traffic accident. On admission, he had no cardiac murmur. Two days later, a pansystolic murmur appeared over the left lower sternal border. Doppler echocardiogram revealed a large left-to-right shunt through a ventricular septal perforation. We postponed surgical treatment as long as possible because he also exhibited bronchial bleeding due to a lung contusion. Surgical repair of the ruptured ventricular septum was performed 8 days after the chest trauma, because the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio was elevated to 4.6 and cardiac function had deteriorated. During the operation, the site of the septal perforation was easily detected by epicardial echocardiography. A 4-cm tear in the muscular septum was closed through a right ventriculotomy using a pericardial patch reinforced with a Dacron patch. Postoperative recovery was uneventful with the exception of transient right ventricular failure. There was no residual shunt.

Objective: This study investigated the association between use of sedatives in terminal cancer patients near death who were receiving home care and the home care period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records for 1032 cancer patients who received home palliative care from 17 specialized home care clinics between June and November 2013. We checked the use of sedatives within 48 hours before death at home, and we compared the home care period between patients with and without sedation. Results: The sedatives used were diazepam (n, %: 100, 52%), flunitrazepam (29, 15%), bromazepam (27, 14%), midazolam (26, 13%), and phenobarbital (20, 10%). The median home care period (median [quartiles]) was 26 [13, 63] days and 25 [10, 64] days (Adj p=0.79) for the patients with and without sedatives, respectively. Conclusion: Among terminal cancer patients near death receiving home care, 24% were administered sedatives, with more than half of those patients receiving diazepam. There was no association between use of sedatives and the home care period.