PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of foot reflexology on fatigue, sleep and pain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Electronic database and manual searches were conducted on all published studies reporting the effects of foot reflexology on fatigue, sleep, and pain. Forty four studies were eligible including 15 studies associated with fatigue, 18 with sleep, and 11 with pain. The effects of foot reflexology were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.0. The homogeneity and the fail-safe N were calculated. Moreover, a funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: The effects on fatigue, sleep, and pain were not homogeneous and ranged from 0.63 to 5.29, 0.01 to 3.22, and 0.43 to 2.67, respectively. The weighted averages for fatigue, sleep, and pain were 1.43, 1.19, and 1.35, respectively. No publication bias was detected as evaluated by fail-safe N. Foot reflexology had a larger effect on fatigue and sleep and a smaller effect on pain. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that foot reflexology is a useful nursing intervention to relieve fatigue and to promote sleep. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of foot reflexology on outcome variables other than fatigue, sleep and pain.
Databases, Factual ; Fatigue/*therapy ; Female ; *Foot ; Humans ; Male ; *Massage ; Pain Management/*nursing ; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/*therapy

The survival rate after lung transplantation has increased in recent years, leading to an increase in non-pulmonary conditions that require surgical intervention. These post-transplant surgical procedures, however, are associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Intra-abdominal conditions are the most common reasons for surgical intervention. We describe here two patients who underwent abdominal surgery under general anesthesia following lung transplantation. One patient underwent cholecystectomy due to cholecystitis after heart-lung transplantation, and the other patient had an exploratory laparotomy for duodenal ulcer perforation after double lung transplantation. Depending on the type of transplant intervention, the physiology of the transplanted lung must be considered for general anesthesia. Knowledge of underlying conditions and immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation are important for safe and effective general anesthesia.
Anesthesia* ; Anesthesia, General ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystitis ; Duodenal Ulcer ; Heart-Lung Transplantation ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Lung ; Lung Transplantation* ; Mortality ; Physiology ; Survival Rate

Malnutrition is one of the most important factors for the development of nosocomial infection (NI). We performed a study of the correlation between abnormal nutritional factors and NI risk by investigating the patients who stayed longer than 3 days in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our university hospital. The patients were classified into three groups based on serum albumin levels and total lymphocyte counts (TLC). The criteria of Group I (well nourished group) were serum albumin level of 3.5 g/dl or higher and TLC of 1, 400/mm3 or higher. The criteria of Group III (severely malnourished group) were serum albumin of less than 2.8 g/dl and TLC of less than 1, 000/mm3. The other patients were classified as Group II (moderately malnourished group). The occurrences of NI were monitored during the study period and the APACHE III Score was calculated. The probability of first NI infection in Group III was 2.4 times higher than that in Groups I and II. The mortality rate of 20.5% was more significantly correlated with APACHE III Score than nutritional status. Nineteen (53%) of the total 36 NI patients were infected within 10 days after ICU admission and they all belonged to Group III. When we compared the gap period between infections, the time to first infection was significant.
Cross Infection/*epidemiology ; Female ; Human ; Incidence ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Nutrition Disorders/*complications/immunology ; Serum Albumin/analysis

BACKGROUND: Rapid fluid warming has been a cardinal measure to maintain normothermia during fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. A previous laboratory simulation study with different fluid infusion rates showed that a fluid warmer using magnetic induction is superior to a warmer using countercurrent heat exchange. We tested whether the simulation-based result is translated into the clinical liver transplantation. METHODS: Two hundred twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between April 2009 and October 2011 were initially screened. Seventeen recipients given a magnetic induction warmer (FMS2000) were matched 1 : 1 with those given a countercurrent heat exchange warmer (Level-1 H-1000) based on propensity score. Matched variables included age, gender, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, graft size and time under anesthesia. Core temperatures were taken at predetermined time points. RESULTS: Level-1 and FMS groups had comparable core temperature throughout the surgery from skin incision, the beginning/end of the anhepatic phase to skin closure. (P = 0.165, repeated measures ANOVA). The degree of core temperature changes within the dissection, anhepatic and postreperfusion phase were also comparable between the two groups. The minimum intraoperative core temperature was also comparable (Level 1, 35.6degrees C vs. FMS, 35.4degrees C, P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: A countercurrent heat exchange warmer and magnetic induction warmer displayed comparable function regarding the maintenance of core temperature and prevention of hypothermia during living donor liver transplantation. The applicability of the two devices in liver transplantation needs to be evaluated in various populations and clinical settings.
Anesthesia ; Body Mass Index ; Body Temperature Changes ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Hypothermia ; Hypovolemia ; Liver Diseases ; Liver Transplantation* ; Living Donors* ; Propensity Score ; Resuscitation ; Rewarming ; Skin ; Transplants

BACKGROUND: Rapid fluid warming has been a cardinal measure to maintain normothermia during fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. A previous laboratory simulation study with different fluid infusion rates showed that a fluid warmer using magnetic induction is superior to a warmer using countercurrent heat exchange. We tested whether the simulation-based result is translated into the clinical liver transplantation. METHODS: Two hundred twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between April 2009 and October 2011 were initially screened. Seventeen recipients given a magnetic induction warmer (FMS2000) were matched 1 : 1 with those given a countercurrent heat exchange warmer (Level-1 H-1000) based on propensity score. Matched variables included age, gender, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, graft size and time under anesthesia. Core temperatures were taken at predetermined time points. RESULTS: Level-1 and FMS groups had comparable core temperature throughout the surgery from skin incision, the beginning/end of the anhepatic phase to skin closure. (P = 0.165, repeated measures ANOVA). The degree of core temperature changes within the dissection, anhepatic and postreperfusion phase were also comparable between the two groups. The minimum intraoperative core temperature was also comparable (Level 1, 35.6degrees C vs. FMS, 35.4degrees C, P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: A countercurrent heat exchange warmer and magnetic induction warmer displayed comparable function regarding the maintenance of core temperature and prevention of hypothermia during living donor liver transplantation. The applicability of the two devices in liver transplantation needs to be evaluated in various populations and clinical settings.
Anesthesia ; Body Mass Index ; Body Temperature Changes ; Hot Temperature ; Humans ; Hypothermia ; Hypovolemia ; Liver Diseases ; Liver Transplantation* ; Living Donors* ; Propensity Score ; Resuscitation ; Rewarming ; Skin ; Transplants